dark light

MFowler

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 301 through 306 (of 306 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Critique Of TIGHAR By Ex-member/Donor #770061
    MFowler
    Participant

    Gillespie has a rather interesting approach for fundraising with regards to TIGHAR – if it doesn’t have a big and immediate payoff, it seems he’s not that interested.

    Case in point, the Amazon Smile program, where people who shop on Amazon can designate a charity to receive a small portion of their receipts. Obviously, the more people who shop on Amazon who select your charity, the more money the charity receives – but it is NEVER going to be a huge amount. Amazon does it strictly as a PR move, it seems to me. Gillespie got quite excited several years ago when a person on the TIGHAR forums suggested people start doing Amazon Smile for TIGHAR (this was before Gillespie implemented pay-to-post and banned all non-members from the forums).

    There the matter rested for awhile, until a member queried how things were going with Smile (Gillespie hadn’t done anything to promote or encourage it, beyond the initial enthusiasm, if I recall correctly). Gillespie flatly dismissed it as a waste, as TIGHAR got a check for a few dollars, once in awhile.

    Which prompted me, at least, to switch my Smile charity to one that was at least publicly appreciative of ANY support it could get.

    in reply to: Critique Of TIGHAR By Ex-member/Donor #770301
    MFowler
    Participant

    J Boyle said, “I’m beginning to think the main scientific discovery to be made here has little to do with history and more to do with mental health. The case has become a public Rorschach test for the advocates of the various theories.”

    After having been involved in and exposed to the various Earhart theories for almost two decades, I’m inclined to agree with that. There tends to be an extraordinarily high degree of animosity (I’m being charitable here) among the various theories. TIGHER is not the most strident among them but Gillespie does do a thorough job of denigrating anyone who doesn’t believe TIGHAR (and by extension him) wholeheartedly.

    I’m currently reading a fascinating book, When Prophecy Fails, by Leon Festinger et. al., a fascinating study of a 1954 incident in which a Chicago housewife predicted the end of the world and a great flood to “cleanse” the planet, with the chosen few being evacuated beforehand by flying saucers. The authors coined the term “cognitive dissonance” for what happens to people when a firmly-held belief is proven to be demonstrably untrue, and how people can become even more fervent believers after their belief is shown to be untrue. It requires five basic conditions:

    • A belief must be held with deep conviction and it must have some relevance to action, that is, to what the believer does or how he or she behaves.
    • The person holding the belief must have committed himself to it; that is, for the sake of his belief, he must have taken some important action that is difficult to undo. In general, the more important such actions are, and the more difficult they are to undo, the greater is the individual’s commitment to the belief.
    • The belief must be sufficiently specific and sufficiently concerned with the real world so that events may unequivocally refute the belief.
    • Such undeniable disconfirmatory evidence must occur and must be recognized by the individual holding the belief.
    • The individual believer must have social support. It is unlikely that one isolated believer could withstand the kind of disconfirming evidence that has been specified. If, however, the believer is a member of a group of convinced persons who can support one another, the belief may be maintained and the believers may attempt to proselytize or persuade nonmembers that the belief is correct.

    I wonder how many of those conditions apply to TIGHAR, and the other Earhart theory groups?

    in reply to: Critique Of TIGHAR By Ex-member/Donor #771227
    MFowler
    Participant

    I agree that TIGHAR’s method for publishing books is odd, but it is not unheard of. At least in the case of Finding Amelia, a book was published in part with member’s assistance.

    Not so the case with the promised Niku VIII video. That was to be a first for TIGHAR, an in-house video of the expedition so the organization wouldn’t have to give up most of the profits to media rights. To help make it happen, they offered the Your Name Up In Lights campaign, where everyone who contributed at least $49 would get a copy of the video and their name listed in the credits. No one knows how many people pledged to help, or how much money was eventually raised – Gillespie hasn’t released specifics.

    The video has never happened. Other than saying in January 2016 it is “indefinitely delayed,” Gillespie refuses to discuss it. It has now been, what, two-and-a-half years since Niku VIII? TIGHAR made a promise, hasn’t kept it, has no schedule to keep it, and is keeping the money in the meantime.

    in reply to: Critique Of TIGHAR By Ex-member/Donor #771747
    MFowler
    Participant

    Mahone – the chart I made shows the percentage of “compensation” every year from the total income for that year, which indicates, to me at least, that there is no control over how much compensation Gillespie and Thrasher receive. It’s normal, and to be expected in a non-profit of this type, for income to vary from year to year, especially in expedition years.

    What is not normal is the huge swings in executive compensation – which indicates that with that item, at the very least, no one is paying any attention to it. There are any number of “best practices” for US non-profits with regards to executive compensation, how it is calculated, how it is awarded and managed, etc. Suffice it to say that having the chief executive tell the board how much to pay him isn’t on any of those lists.

    in reply to: Critique Of TIGHAR By Ex-member/Donor #774781
    MFowler
    Participant

    Getting back to TIGHAR …

    One of the things that stuck me, after I really started seeing things, is how much executive compensation changes from year-to-year at TIGHAR. In many US non-profits, salaries are a relatively stable item, except for the raises for cost of living or if someone takes on new duties. Those are things you would expect and which wouldn’t raise an eyebrow anywhere, including with the IRS.

    It doesn’t work that way at TIGHAR. Executive compensation bounces up and down like a brand new tennis ball, although there is a rough correlation between higher compensation and years when expeditions take place. That is expected, there is a lot more work and planning involved. If you look at the percentage of executive compensation compared to total revenues for a specific year, it is all over the map – ranging from a low of about 9 percent to a high of 78 percent of revenues for a given year. Since these numbers are from the IRS 990 forms TIGHAR has to file every year, which are available to the public and which Gillespie or Thrasher have to sign off on, there’s not much to argue about as far as the numbers themselves go. If anyone has different information or wants to dispute these numbers, I’m open to updating them.

    Executive compensation as a percentage of revenue has averaged 41 percent a year at TIGHAR over the last 15 years, and is about 29 percent of overall revenues for the same time period. In other words, for the past 15 years, not quite one-third of the money TIGHAR has raised has gone to pay Gillespie, Thrasher and the handful of part-time/temporary employees they use. The chart below might be useful:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]258419[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Critique Of TIGHAR By Ex-member/Donor #775382
    MFowler
    Participant

    Mr. Maxwell –

    I’m flattered that you seem to think I have influence all out of proportion to what actually exists (i.e., none), but truth be told, I never asked anyone to ban you from anything. Nor can I speak to why you were banned from the other forum. I disagreed with your premise, and still do, but if you come up with some genuinely new information I’m more than willing to look at it, as I’m sure others are.

Viewing 6 posts - 301 through 306 (of 306 total)