I’ve shot my bolt. I’ll need more clues before I can venture any guesses.
They also tended to flip over too eagerly. I do think they were lovely ships, though.
I wonder if an Arethusa with eight 4in guns was at any significant disadvantage in AA firepower.
It’s too bad there wasn’t a suitable platform to feature the 4.5in gun, which I regard as a winner. Scylla and Charydbis were probably too much ship for the weaponry. I think a good super-destroyer was in order.
I was reading not long ago that they have found it after it had been lost by the Soviets over 60 years ago
The Tripartite Naval Commission at the end of the European war rated GZ in Category C–requiring more than six months repair. All ships in Category C were to be disposed of by 1947. The Soviets were allowed to have GZ with the promise that she’d be so disposed of. After raising her, the Soviets towed her eastward and had a good look at what she had to show (which really wasn’t much). They then took her out to open water and started detonating bombs and shells on her deck. Rough weather started pushing her toward the Polish coast, so the weapons trials had to be cut short. The Soviets hit her with ropedoes, and she went down.
Dido class, Bellona sub-class
There were sixteen Dido-type ships commissioned. During the war, they combined to shoot down a total of fifteen aircraft. I keep thinking the RN would have been better off just building more Arethusas, and I dislike Arethusas.
1: Graf Zeppelin, perhaps the worst carrier design ever. Coolest feature, the bow propellers.
I’m gonna need more clues on 2 and 4.
As long as you stick to a WWII time frame. Anything after WWII, I wouldn’t even try to guess.
Haguro Heavy cruiser
Argh! I was off by one class.
The first Japanese heavy cruisers were designed with 200mm guns. The Washington Treaty set the limit for cruiser guns at 203mm. The Japanese eventually switched out all their cruiser 200mm guns and mounted 203mm guns in their place. Was a gain of 3mm really worth it?
One ship–Aoba?–kept her original guns, but they were rebored to 203mm.
What’s interesting about #3 is that you can see the main battery, the secondary battery, and the tertiary battery.
The 90mm heavy AA guns were in a row of single mounts.
The secondary battery consisted of 135mm triples, strangely placed alongside the bridge. You can actually see two mounts, though the super-firing mount is much easier to spot.
The main battery is obvious, but though you can see the twin mount, the three guns of the forward mount are indistinguishable.
I just noticed all the 90mm mounts in Pic 3. It’s Doria class, though I can’t possibly say whether it’s Duilio or Doria.
The lengthened bow in the rebuilt Dorias was a bit more elaborate than in the Cavours. If you look at a longitudinal section of a rebuilt Cavour, you can actually see the old bow inside the new one.
care to go for the bonuses?
The Sevastopols were the only dreadnought class to receive cemented deck protection. ParKom was rebuilt with 3in strakes of leftover belt armor added. I assume it was a rather patchy bit of work, as you can’t efficient attach anything to the face of cemented armor.
The Sevaastopols were the only dreadnought class to receive mineral deck armor…by which I mean the slabs of granite that were piled onto Marat’s deck after her unpleasant encounter with Stuka bombs. It didn’t work too well.
I can’t identify ships even when I can see them in their entirety. What about number 5? It looks Japanese to me. Is it one of the many incarnations of the Furutaka/Aoba class?
It’s a Porter, though I couldn’t tell you which one.
Centurion is fun; she went from one KGV class to the other.
I can’t believe you guys are doing all these WWII ships, and I missed it.
Let’s see if I can attach a pic without blowing anything up.
Update:
The book Raising the Red Banner is scheduled for a January 20th release, much sooner than I expected. If you’re interested, you can pre-order at Amazon.uk or almost any other Amazon except Amazon US, for some reason.
Does anyone have an armor schematic for the Sverdlovs?