dark light

fulcrum-aholic

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 340 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Navy News and Discussions #2023927
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    Looking for MiG-29K Pics…

    are there any other good Indian Navy Mig-29K pics?? search on the net & found one from this post…

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2025409
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5j_5qClWes7iAtH9uKDkJ_Huf3uaw

    By Murray Brewster (CP) – 21 hours ago

    OTTAWA — The air force has sent a surveillance plane to keep tabs on two Russian attack submarines cruising off the East Coast in a patrol that harkens back to the Cold War.

    The nuclear-powered subs were first spotted in international waters off Georgia on Aug. 5, raising eyebrows, but no sharp response from either the U.S. or Canada.

    Defence sources say it’s believed the Akula II Class warships have since moved north, and remain outside of Canadian and American territorial limits, which extends 12 nautical miles into the ocean.

    It’s unclear whether Canada took the initiative to have a CP-140 Aurora patrol plane watch the vessels, or whether there was a request from the U.S. Northern Command which tracks submarines.

    A spokesman for Canada Command, the Ottawa-based military headquarters in charge of continental defence, downplayed the surveillance mission and refused to discuss details, describing it as “routine” for the patrol aircraft which have spent most of their nearly 30 year career as submarine hunters.

    “We don’t talk about ongoing activity, especially if it’s a surveillance flight,” said Lt. Noel Paine. “We don’t discuss any activity of vessel of interest – or any area that (the aircraft) is flying.”

    The Russian patrol comes as the navy prepares to conduct an anti-submarine exercise in the Arctic this month.

    It also comes just a few days after Defence Minister Peter MacKay criticized Moscow over a planned exercise to drop paratroopers on the North Pole this summer.

    On Tuesday, MacKay was quick to point out that the submarines had not done anything threatening, but said it’s all part of a pattern of “Russia flexing its muscle” on the world stage.

    “For a variety of reasons, to demonstrate our commitment to sovereignty, we’re watching to ensure we know what is happening along our coastlines,” he said in a telephone interview from his Nova Scotia riding.

    “Anything that comes near sovereign Canadian territory, we are going to react.”

    MacKay’s hawkish comments have in the past been dismissed by critics as the stale rhetoric from the Cold War, but defence insiders say they point to a mounting frustration within the Conservative government over Russia’s wilful attitude when it comes to testing the boundaries of other countries.

    The Kremlin often doesn’t give any warning.

    American officials say Moscow did not notify them about the submarine excursion – the first of its kind since the end of the Cold War.

    It is another sign of stepped up Russian military activity, which has included several flights by strategic bombers that have brushed up against Canada’s Arctic border – but not crossed over.

    Last February, Canadian fighter jets scrambled to intercept an approaching Russian bomber less than 24 hours before U.S. President Barack Obama’s visit to Ottawa.

    As with other cases, the long-range Bear bomber did not enter Canada’s airspace but the two CF-18 fighters had to order the plane to “back off.”

    The Arctic, with its prospective mineral wealth and ill-defined borders, has become an area of intense competition among Canada, Russia, the United States, Denmark and other countries.

    The Kremlin caused a stir this year by declaring it was creating a special military force to protect its oil and natural gas interests in the Arctic – a plan that Russian Ambassador Georgyi Mamedov claimed was twisted out of context by Western governments.

    Last year, the Russian navy conducted an exercise with Venezuela in the Caribbean, in what was the first deployment of Russian ships to the Western Hemisphere since the Cold War.

    “…It’s unclear whether Canada took the initiative to have a CP-140 Aurora patrol plane watch the vessels…”

    A CP-140 Aurora or two has been passing by to Iqaluit the past few weeks…

    Operation Nanook Exercise wraps up this past weekend concerning the Arctic Sovererignty (protecting Canada’s Northwest Passage, North Pole). 3 CF-18s, HMCS Toronto, HMCS Corner Brook, CP-140 Aurora, & Sea King chopper took part of the exercise…

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper, centre, Defence Minister Peter MacKay, right, and Cmdr. Alex Grant of the HMCS Toronto watch as CF-18 jets fly past with HMCS Corner Brook and Coast Guard ship Pierre Radisson in the background on Frobisher Bay, Wednesday. The prime minister was conducting a tour of the Arctic in support of Canadian sovereignty. Columnist Max Wolfe argues that Canada can protect its territorial waters on the east coast by regulating ship traffic in Head Harbour Passage. (http://telegraphjournal.canadaeast.com/front/article/768444)

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2025984
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    Canada tracking Russian subs off East Coast

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5j_5qClWes7iAtH9uKDkJ_Huf3uaw

    By Murray Brewster (CP) – 21 hours ago

    OTTAWA — The air force has sent a surveillance plane to keep tabs on two Russian attack submarines cruising off the East Coast in a patrol that harkens back to the Cold War.

    The nuclear-powered subs were first spotted in international waters off Georgia on Aug. 5, raising eyebrows, but no sharp response from either the U.S. or Canada.

    Defence sources say it’s believed the Akula II Class warships have since moved north, and remain outside of Canadian and American territorial limits, which extends 12 nautical miles into the ocean.

    It’s unclear whether Canada took the initiative to have a CP-140 Aurora patrol plane watch the vessels, or whether there was a request from the U.S. Northern Command which tracks submarines.

    A spokesman for Canada Command, the Ottawa-based military headquarters in charge of continental defence, downplayed the surveillance mission and refused to discuss details, describing it as “routine” for the patrol aircraft which have spent most of their nearly 30 year career as submarine hunters.

    “We don’t talk about ongoing activity, especially if it’s a surveillance flight,” said Lt. Noel Paine. “We don’t discuss any activity of vessel of interest – or any area that (the aircraft) is flying.”

    The Russian patrol comes as the navy prepares to conduct an anti-submarine exercise in the Arctic this month.

    It also comes just a few days after Defence Minister Peter MacKay criticized Moscow over a planned exercise to drop paratroopers on the North Pole this summer.

    On Tuesday, MacKay was quick to point out that the submarines had not done anything threatening, but said it’s all part of a pattern of “Russia flexing its muscle” on the world stage.

    “For a variety of reasons, to demonstrate our commitment to sovereignty, we’re watching to ensure we know what is happening along our coastlines,” he said in a telephone interview from his Nova Scotia riding.

    “Anything that comes near sovereign Canadian territory, we are going to react.”

    MacKay’s hawkish comments have in the past been dismissed by critics as the stale rhetoric from the Cold War, but defence insiders say they point to a mounting frustration within the Conservative government over Russia’s wilful attitude when it comes to testing the boundaries of other countries.

    The Kremlin often doesn’t give any warning.

    American officials say Moscow did not notify them about the submarine excursion – the first of its kind since the end of the Cold War.

    It is another sign of stepped up Russian military activity, which has included several flights by strategic bombers that have brushed up against Canada’s Arctic border – but not crossed over.

    Last February, Canadian fighter jets scrambled to intercept an approaching Russian bomber less than 24 hours before U.S. President Barack Obama’s visit to Ottawa.

    As with other cases, the long-range Bear bomber did not enter Canada’s airspace but the two CF-18 fighters had to order the plane to “back off.”

    The Arctic, with its prospective mineral wealth and ill-defined borders, has become an area of intense competition among Canada, Russia, the United States, Denmark and other countries.

    The Kremlin caused a stir this year by declaring it was creating a special military force to protect its oil and natural gas interests in the Arctic – a plan that Russian Ambassador Georgyi Mamedov claimed was twisted out of context by Western governments.

    Last year, the Russian navy conducted an exercise with Venezuela in the Caribbean, in what was the first deployment of Russian ships to the Western Hemisphere since the Cold War.

    “…It’s unclear whether Canada took the initiative to have a CP-140 Aurora patrol plane watch the vessels…”

    A CP-140 Aurora or two has been passing by to Iqaluit the past few weeks…

    in reply to: B787 first flight delayed (again) #528215
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    I think they’ve changed the name from Dreamliner to the Spruce Goose Mk 2

    That’s a goodie one…:D:D

    in reply to: UAV, How Long They Go Way Back?! #2439216
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    thanks for the replies, guys. kinda interesting, too. UAVs & Drones, different or not the same?! they’re both pilotless, UAVs for specialized missions while Drones are mostly for target practice?!

    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion -VII #2440154
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    Current LCA has no radar. Many say MMR integration is complete etc. but no offical news on that.

    meanwhile

    http://livefist.blogspot.com/2009/06/field-evaluations-of-six-fighters.html

    I would love to see all the six contenders taking off one by one and fight to the finish or finish with just one winner after taking out one of each contender…

    in reply to: MMRCA news (including the Rafale bid) #2457911
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-zCxDGpuwQ

    Well, if looks was a deciding factor then Gripen would probably win 😎

    L

    After watching the clip, Gripen’s small size and single-engine doesn’t leave much for further upgrades or adding additional stuff for the airframe. Nice clip, though, and somehow I could only picture F-20 Tigershark instead of the Gripen whenever they show the jet from the clip.

    in reply to: General Discussion #338016
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    Last Night’s The Unexpected…

    What made me smiled today?? Hmmm…

    Last night while my girlfriend was talking to one of her “other” boyfriends on the phone, I decided to make a move on her. We actually started doing it in the middle of her conversation and we just continued without stopping. The rest of the story, well, alittle too much for info and I gotta stop there. All I could say is that was one live sex hotline experience to whoever she was talking to on the phone.

    Anyways, afterwards, she had to tell me that was one hell of an experience that she’ll never forget for awhile. Same goes for me and that made me smiled today…

    in reply to: What made you smile today? #1911168
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    Last Night’s The Unexpected…

    What made me smiled today?? Hmmm…

    Last night while my girlfriend was talking to one of her “other” boyfriends on the phone, I decided to make a move on her. We actually started doing it in the middle of her conversation and we just continued without stopping. The rest of the story, well, alittle too much for info and I gotta stop there. All I could say is that was one live sex hotline experience to whoever she was talking to on the phone.

    Anyways, afterwards, she had to tell me that was one hell of an experience that she’ll never forget for awhile. Same goes for me and that made me smiled today…

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – II #2502842
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant
    in reply to: Tragedy at 23,000 Feet… #554430
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    whoops!! sorry i didn’t know it was already posted…

    in reply to: Canada, why not the Super Hornet? #2460748
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant
    in reply to: Canada, why not the Super Hornet? #2476479
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    Interesting (well, sort of). The thought of us Canadians going out to war to protect our soveriegnty?! I was living in a small hamlet across Greenland for awhile and it’s a big open space, and it’s the Northwest Passage.

    We would need more than just jets to protect the area. I don’t think airpower alone would be enough to protect the resources, etc., but we wouldn’t do it alone either. There are other countries who wants a piece not just from the NW Passage, but including from the North Pole, too. The thought of having both the Super Hornets & F-35s would be neat, though…

    in reply to: US1549 Downed (Merged) #585446
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/01/15/america/15crash-FW-408934.php

    unbelievable that all aboard the plane were okay (so far)…

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode VI #2498081
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    Wow, that East German Su-22 is BRUTAL! (Allways kind of liked them, but this one takes the cake) 🙂

    If your looking for uggly Rus./Sov. aircraft (and yes, there are a few) you should have chosen Su-15, Be-12 and Tu-22 (Blinder) instead.

    Sorry for OT.

    something like a stocky, cigar-chomping, no-holds-bar kinda general?!

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 340 total)