dark light

Jackonicko

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 2,006 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Jackonicko
    Participant

    There was one set of engagements with the F-22, TMor. All were WVR. The F-22 won all of them, against all comers. (They didn’t fight the RJAF F-16s or the Typhoons).

    The six Raptors were undefeated, against all opponents. 27th FS CO Lt Col Lansing Pilch was quoted by the Virginian as saying that: β€œIn every test we did, the Raptors just blew the competition out of the water.”

    I believe the Rafales did well, though, and impressed the F-22 pilots.

    in reply to: Typhoon Beating F 15 ? Just PR talk ? #2394964
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    So was it 2002 or 2007?

    in reply to: Typhoon Beating F 15 ? Just PR talk ? #2395311
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    Interesting. I’ve never seen any picture of a Rafale firing its gun, nor of a Rafale having fired its gun, nor have I read any report of EC 1/7 having done any strafe, nor of the gun being available for use.

    Was the gun something that industry were going to clear, or was it being left to the customer – as was the case for Typhoon?

    Nor would I expect the AdlA to have bothered pushing forward with clearance of such a low priority item at this stage. The RAF had a specific reason for doing so.

    in reply to: Typhoon Beating F 15 ? Just PR talk ? #2395854
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    RAF Typhoons have certainly done live strafe with the gun, and it has been cleared for frontline use.

    Has Rafale?

    in reply to: Typhoon Beating F 15 ? Just PR talk ? #2406644
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    “Tiffies were on the blue side.”

    Where’s the link?

    I’m not saying you’re wrong, but I’ve seen nothing to state definitively what the RoE or briefed limits were.

    in reply to: Typhoon Beating F 15 ? Just PR talk ? #2407793
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    Which ‘toys’ do you think an F-15C has that Typhoon doesn’t?

    When it comes to Net Enabled warfare, there’s little in it, but Typhoon is probably better ‘connected’.

    No-one would choose those odds, but Madrat (to whom I was replying) did not say anyone would rather be in one of eight F-15s rather than one of a pair of Typhoons. He seemed to imply that 1 vs 1 the F-15 was superior.

    It ain’t.

    in reply to: Nimrod, destined only for British service? #2407838
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    I expect that the cabin pressure differential was somewhat greater in the Comets, too. They flew higher, and with civilian passengers’ comfort to take account of. Every pressurisation cycle would therefore have had a greater effect on the airframe.

    in reply to: Typhoon Beating F 15 ? Just PR talk ? #2407841
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    “If it’s a shooting war you’re going to want to be in the F-15C.”

    Nonsense. I’d want to be in an F-22, if I wanted to live. And if that were not allowed in a Typhoon. The cockpit of an F-15C would come some way down my wish list.

    Jackonicko
    Participant

    I’d say that the piece illustrated represents Dassault’s official endorsement that ATLC “demonstrated the superiority of our equipment against the Typhoon of the RAF.”

    Unless the magazine contains the detailed (4-0 3-1 score claims) in which case it endorses the detailed claims as well.

    That adds fuel to the fire.

    in reply to: Nimrod, destined only for British service? #2409980
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    The original Nimrod MR1 came close to getting export customers – notably Canada.

    The MRA4 has also attracted interest, though the decision to convert aircraft from existing airframes killed off the biggest opportunity.

    Jackonicko
    Participant

    Are you being deliberately obtuse, are you hard of understanding, or is reading not your thing?

    The ‘eroding edge’ enjoyed by F-15K/F-16E is only that conferred by JHMCS and IRST – in all other areas Typhoon has a much greater edge.

    ‘Catching up’ was in specific reference to PIRATE and the F-15K/F-16E/F’s IRSTs.

    PIRATE is actually older than those pieces of equipment.

    JHMCS will be overtaken by HEA (which represents a generational leap) which will be in full frontline service later in the year.

    Jackonicko
    Participant

    “The ONLY area the Typhoon has an advantage is in manueverability and maybe acceleration………”

    and supercruise, and speed with an A-A loadout, and rate of climb, and MMI, and radar range, radar range at azimuth, and ASRAAM, and, and, and …..

    The only areas where these legacy aircraft enjoy any edge is JHMCS (Typhoon’s HEA will be in squadron service this summer) and IRST (Typhoon has PIRATE, which is improving all the time, and which already exceeds the capability of legacy IRST’s in some areas, and is catching up in others).

    This edge is eroding VERY rapidly.

    Jackonicko
    Participant

    Sferrin.

    Typhoon wipes the floor with F-15K or F-16E/F.

    Sintra.

    Toan was implying that we had whined and moaned when Rafale ‘beat’ Typhoon (he doesn’t seem to get it that we were pointing out that such a claim was wrong), and that now that F-15 had similarly been ‘beaten’ the F-15 supporters would do as we had supposedly done.

    Jackonicko
    Participant

    Am i missing something or is this 35 year old aircraft the same one that the F22 has been stomping all over which then resulted in all the puff about the F22’s abilities…?

    No, it’s the 35 year old aircraft whose abilities are still so formidable that it remains adequate to provide the USAF with air dominance and whose excellence is such that Raptor production can safely be capped at 187 aircraft.

    And it’s the aircraft that remains adequate to deal with today’s threats, as exemplified by the Typhoon….

    Ah, ……. ok. Slight problem.

    Jackonicko
    Participant

    TMor,

    I only correct the untruths. I still manage to make a lot more positive comments about Rafale than you’ve ever made about Typhoon.

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 2,006 total)