dark light

Jackonicko

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,396 through 1,410 (of 2,006 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rafale news #2506192
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    Does anyone know the identities of the Rafale Bs deployed to Dushanbe?

    Was B318 (7-HM) among them?

    (Dassault’s 7,500 th aircraft, don’t you know……)

    in reply to: Rafale news #2506521
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    Does anyone know how many sorties the Rafale Ms flew during Serpentaire, how many sorties the M F2s flew, and how many bombs they dropped?

    Did they ever carry anything other than GBU-12s? (CEMS Bang, for example?)

    How many bombs did they drop?

    When was the last Rafale M F2 sortie over Afghanistan?

    Does anyone know similar stats for the air force Rafales operating from Dushanbe, up to a particular date?

    in reply to: Rafale news #2507229
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    What does it say, exactly?

    Are you suggesting that Rafale Roadmap will have just one bulge above the nose, with no FLIR or IRST except when Damocles is carried? Or just that OSF IT will include the old IRST with a new TV/laser?

    in reply to: Rafale news #2507257
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    I won’t be in Paris until later this week. Could you post a synopsis, or scan the article?

    So the OSF IT will have the same FLIR/IRST and a new TV/laser ranger?

    That’s no bad thing – OSF’s a good sensor, and with better processing (an inevitable by product of the planned obsolescence rectification, surely?) will gain the kind of multiple target tracking capabilities that Pirate has.

    in reply to: Rafale news #2507393
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    I doubt that they’ll bin the FLIR, TMor. Where did you get that from?

    in reply to: Rafale news #2507449
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    F4 may never have been an official designation – but at one time it did seem to be the favoured ‘shorthand’ and I have lost count of the number of times I’ve written it down in notebooks when talking to people about Rafale, M88, AESA, etc.

    in reply to: Rafale news #2507718
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    I should have said, explicitely, that OSF IT will be introduced with the “Roadmap” aircraft (the Dasault folk all seem to use the English term, rather than ‘Carte de Route’ or ‘Carte Routiére’ to the extent that I don’t know the French term) which is what they now seem to be calling the follow on to F3. The F4 designation seems to have been dropped.

    in reply to: Rafale news #2507725
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    OSF is designed to be ‘plug and play’. This is important, as it means that OSF will be able to be fitted to aircraft AS REQUIRED, and that the fact that some aircraft (the 59 F3s) are being delivered without OSF is less significant. The 48 existing OSF kits are to be shared between 110 aircraft – and that’s judged to be OK.

    The FSO-IT/OSF-IT/OSF NG schedule is delayed by the longer timescale of AESA – since both will be evaluated and validated simultaneously. It could easily be available sooner, if funding were available.

    The changes are primarily to address issues of obsolescence, though there will be improvements to capability, performance and wavelength.

    I doubt that they’ll bin the FLIR, TMor. Where did you get that from?

    in reply to: Canberra Operators #2509545
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    Apart from warbirds:

    NASA: Two WB-57F. Further aircraft may return to use.

    HAMM: Two former DERA B6 Mod/B6/8

    Two further TT18s may return to use in the USA

    Two PR9s may return to service in the UK under lease.

    About eight B8/58 are maintained in airworthy condition in Peru.

    in reply to: Why no Typhoon book? #2509922
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    The RAF has just one full squadron, and it isn’t yet fully operational.

    The RAF is about to get its first Block 5 jet.

    We’re really not far along the road towards full service, and things are changing every week. It’s a bit early for a book, I’d have said.

    in reply to: Rafale news #2510697
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    Google translation, eh? That looks useful, and might help me quite a bit. Thanks TMor

    in reply to: Rafale news #2511152
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    All French people speak more quickly than I think….

    But then I think slowly.:confused:

    I think you should all go to Brussels to learn how to speak French properly.:eek:

    Every time I’m in Belgium they speak so slowly and clearly that I can understand what they say, and can kid myself that I understand what’s being said.

    :diablo:

    in reply to: Rafale news #2511239
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    J’orthographierais le mot “étudie” comme ceci: i-n-v-e-s-t-i-g-a-t-e 😉

    (Writing it is easy: If we were face to face, though, I’d have to say: “Vous devez parler TRÈS len-te-ment. Je suis Anglais et je suis désolé, mais je ne peux pas parler français. Parlerez vous trés len – te – ment s’il vous plait.)

    Ou avez-vous voulu dire Monsieur Smartypants (“Slip Intelligent”)?

    in reply to: Rafale news #2511360
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    Not me.:diablo:

    I know how to spell investigate……. 😀

    in reply to: Rafale news #2511375
    Jackonicko
    Participant

    TMor,

    I’m not minimising what Rafale achieved in TLP at all – you can accuse people of that who infer that it flew as a single-role mud mover.

    Exercises are there to get training value from, and if an aircraft gets shot down, the training value for the pilot will be greater – the humiliation of being downed by a Jag, for example, would be embarrassing enough to teach a pilot several lessons about lookout and complacency.

    You might also correctly surmise that everyone on the red side wanted a piece of Rafale – if you were a young fighter pilot, having a kill (especially a guns kill) against the latest and most agile fighter on the opposing team would be worth more than gunning down a lumbering old Tornado.

    There is a suggestion that the same Rafale was shot down in rapid succession by two Jags (a ‘Prescott’) before kill removal could take place. That wouldn’t count, in my book, and I was referring to the report that the F-16s and/or the F-15s got one as well.

    Who cares? Some Rafales were shot down, but they obviously still did well enough to be ranked second in terms of kill:loss ratio.

    It wouldn’t surprise me if someone shot down a Typhoon, too, nor would I view it as being some kind of disaster.

    But I am fascinated to know what did come first.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,396 through 1,410 (of 2,006 total)