Does anyone know the identities of the Rafale Bs deployed to Dushanbe?
Was B318 (7-HM) among them?
(Dassault’s 7,500 th aircraft, don’t you know……)
Does anyone know how many sorties the Rafale Ms flew during Serpentaire, how many sorties the M F2s flew, and how many bombs they dropped?
Did they ever carry anything other than GBU-12s? (CEMS Bang, for example?)
How many bombs did they drop?
When was the last Rafale M F2 sortie over Afghanistan?
Does anyone know similar stats for the air force Rafales operating from Dushanbe, up to a particular date?
What does it say, exactly?
Are you suggesting that Rafale Roadmap will have just one bulge above the nose, with no FLIR or IRST except when Damocles is carried? Or just that OSF IT will include the old IRST with a new TV/laser?
I won’t be in Paris until later this week. Could you post a synopsis, or scan the article?
So the OSF IT will have the same FLIR/IRST and a new TV/laser ranger?
That’s no bad thing – OSF’s a good sensor, and with better processing (an inevitable by product of the planned obsolescence rectification, surely?) will gain the kind of multiple target tracking capabilities that Pirate has.
I doubt that they’ll bin the FLIR, TMor. Where did you get that from?
F4 may never have been an official designation – but at one time it did seem to be the favoured ‘shorthand’ and I have lost count of the number of times I’ve written it down in notebooks when talking to people about Rafale, M88, AESA, etc.
I should have said, explicitely, that OSF IT will be introduced with the “Roadmap” aircraft (the Dasault folk all seem to use the English term, rather than ‘Carte de Route’ or ‘Carte Routiére’ to the extent that I don’t know the French term) which is what they now seem to be calling the follow on to F3. The F4 designation seems to have been dropped.
OSF is designed to be ‘plug and play’. This is important, as it means that OSF will be able to be fitted to aircraft AS REQUIRED, and that the fact that some aircraft (the 59 F3s) are being delivered without OSF is less significant. The 48 existing OSF kits are to be shared between 110 aircraft – and that’s judged to be OK.
The FSO-IT/OSF-IT/OSF NG schedule is delayed by the longer timescale of AESA – since both will be evaluated and validated simultaneously. It could easily be available sooner, if funding were available.
The changes are primarily to address issues of obsolescence, though there will be improvements to capability, performance and wavelength.
I doubt that they’ll bin the FLIR, TMor. Where did you get that from?
Apart from warbirds:
NASA: Two WB-57F. Further aircraft may return to use.
HAMM: Two former DERA B6 Mod/B6/8
Two further TT18s may return to use in the USA
Two PR9s may return to service in the UK under lease.
About eight B8/58 are maintained in airworthy condition in Peru.
The RAF has just one full squadron, and it isn’t yet fully operational.
The RAF is about to get its first Block 5 jet.
We’re really not far along the road towards full service, and things are changing every week. It’s a bit early for a book, I’d have said.
Google translation, eh? That looks useful, and might help me quite a bit. Thanks TMor
All French people speak more quickly than I think….
But then I think slowly.:confused:
I think you should all go to Brussels to learn how to speak French properly.:eek:
Every time I’m in Belgium they speak so slowly and clearly that I can understand what they say, and can kid myself that I understand what’s being said.
:diablo:
J’orthographierais le mot “étudie” comme ceci: i-n-v-e-s-t-i-g-a-t-e 😉
(Writing it is easy: If we were face to face, though, I’d have to say: “Vous devez parler TRÈS len-te-ment. Je suis Anglais et je suis désolé, mais je ne peux pas parler français. Parlerez vous trés len – te – ment s’il vous plait.)
Ou avez-vous voulu dire Monsieur Smartypants (“Slip Intelligent”)?
Not me.:diablo:
I know how to spell investigate……. 😀
TMor,
I’m not minimising what Rafale achieved in TLP at all – you can accuse people of that who infer that it flew as a single-role mud mover.
Exercises are there to get training value from, and if an aircraft gets shot down, the training value for the pilot will be greater – the humiliation of being downed by a Jag, for example, would be embarrassing enough to teach a pilot several lessons about lookout and complacency.
You might also correctly surmise that everyone on the red side wanted a piece of Rafale – if you were a young fighter pilot, having a kill (especially a guns kill) against the latest and most agile fighter on the opposing team would be worth more than gunning down a lumbering old Tornado.
There is a suggestion that the same Rafale was shot down in rapid succession by two Jags (a ‘Prescott’) before kill removal could take place. That wouldn’t count, in my book, and I was referring to the report that the F-16s and/or the F-15s got one as well.
Who cares? Some Rafales were shot down, but they obviously still did well enough to be ranked second in terms of kill:loss ratio.
It wouldn’t surprise me if someone shot down a Typhoon, too, nor would I view it as being some kind of disaster.
But I am fascinated to know what did come first.