I think I saw a shot of the G-STCH rebuild on one of the photo sites recently – Airliners.net, perhaps?
But…. the museum is not part of our operation. We are an separate limited company operating in the hangar next door… although the museum rely on visitors being able to see our flying exhibits being worked on and run.
Sorry for bagging your thread old chap.
You’re welcome to it!
Updated situation and its not good news:
http://www.thisisbournemouth.co.uk/display.var.1874209.0.aviation_museum_may_be_grounded.php
There are no plans to move her to Yeovilton.
The plans I’m aware of focus very much on getting her back onto the airshow circuit.
Let’s hope so.
Closing? No.
Moving, yes.
The two are not the same.
It would be nice if those with the ability to influence this decision could get some action taken towards a reconsideration of this move.
Ironic that Manchester Airport Group also has a fine viewing location at Manchester and yet Bournemouth (owned by the same group) is about to lose its viewing area. Why can’t MAG do something to help the museum so that at least there is still a proper, dedicated viewing area at Bournemouth and somewhere that allows the museum to continue to flourish? Surely that’s got to be good for business?
One can’t help but think that in a few years this car park will probably still not cope with the demand and that more space will be needed so why does it have to be the museum that suffers?
Undoubtedly if the museum does move (not close!), the new site will be much less suited than its current location.
Fingers out time.
Note to Mr eBay seller, your comments are beeing watched on the Flypast Historic Forum.
It’s ex Swiss AF FB.54 G-BLSD/J-1758. Now painted in false RAF markings but not sure if it also carries a serial.
A few comments.
It’s not a Sea Fury – it’s a Fury FB.11 and is registered as such with the CAA. Mr Bradshaw would not like you calling it anything else.
Secondly, it doesn’t fly once a month – it flies every four weeks (and there is a difference).
It was due to fly from Bournemouth last weekend but after John started it up a problem was discovered and so it was hangared again. I’m told it was an oil leak this time.
If John sticks to his 4-weekly cycle then next time should be Saturday 27th October but no doubt such things also have to fit in with his other plans. As is mentioned on the other thread, XR219 on Planetalk seems to be the local in the know … or you could try ringing Bournemouth Aviation Museum a few days before because occasionally they know of his plans.
What are aviation museums for?
– Commemoration.
– Education.
– Inspiration.
– Preservation.
You decide the order. I just placed them alphabetically because to my mind they are all just as important.
Some achieve some of these better than others – perhaps that’s deliberate on the part of the managers or unfortunate as a result of financial constraints.
Given that Yeager might be coming to Legends 2008 that’s no bad thing – many of us will be at RIAT that weekend!!
Congrats to whoever organized two major UK shows on the same weekend!
Personally I think you’ll find it very hard to keep the two threads apart when such things happen. A harder task for the moderators and more people offended when their postings are removed, especially in the circumstances.
I think that those who try to conclude the results of the accident investigation well before the professionals have done their job often get it wrong because they are not fully aware of the circumstances and aren’t seeing things from the professionals’ standpoint. In many cases those who post such conjecture often condemn themselves with their own words long before others wade in to point out the errors. Personally I think such conjecture is best left for the bin. Report what you see if you witnessed the event (even only on video) but leave the guesswork for elsewhere.
As for the condolence messages, well here I think there’s a real value. I think it’s right and proper to grieve with those who grieve and, having witnessed a fatal air crash myself, while my own thoughts might well have been immaterial to most people, having the chance to express them helped me to deal with the aftermath of the horrific event that I had witnessed. Perhaps such thoughts aren’t for an open forum but having an outlet for them is clearly useful for some people and it is not the right of others to deny this.
I would add that I think sometimes people forget how shocking it is for many to watch such crashes aired on TV or the Internet. While it is not as bad as being there, it undoubtedly affects people and again part of the process of dealing with this for some is to talk about it and share thoughts.
In the end my view is that as long as those thoughts aren’t offensive then why should they not be aired here? If they are seen by those more directly affected such as close relatives it only serves to show that people care and are human, so what’s the problem? At times like this such comments can be very supportive and when faced with loss in this way I think people need to realise that they are not alone in their grief.
Where my blood does boil, however, is with those who use such situations simply for their own purposes, namely to try to make themselves look important. How many times have we seen people suddenly make out as if they were best mates with those who have passed away when in fact the deceased probably didn’t know them from Adam? Such stuff is only posted to make the poster look more important and I think it needs to be seen for what it is.
Why is the Sea Vixen grounded?
Because it’s CofA expired on 18/5/07 for starters.
Flying Sea Princes? NONE!
What’s the score with C-GJIE then?
It was reported as airworthy last time I checked.
G-CBEL has not been sold.
She’s staying put in the UK.
Is LZ842 still in the jig at Airframe Assemblies?:confused:
It was yesterday!