dark light

uksceneryman

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 98 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: British Serial question from a Yank #1365009
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    Here’s a quick answer.

    Certain types weren’t allocated specific letters, nor were manufacturers.

    The current system began with just numbers until the number 10000 was reached. From 1916 serials started having letter prefixes, starting with A1. When Z9999 was reached in 1940, the next sequence began, namely two letters and three digits and it began with AA100. This sequence continues today, although in 2004 a decision was taken not to start with 100 each time a new sequence began and so Merlin ZK001 will appear shortly.

    Currently the sequence is running in the ZK… range, although personalised serials can now be allocated (ZZ171-174 being C-17s, for example).

    Until recently ‘black-out’ blocks were issued to confuse matters. These were blocks of serials deliberately not allocated to any airframe. This practice has now been stopped.

    in reply to: FS2004 Century of flight problems. #239810
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    This is a strange phenomenon and not one I’ve heard of before.

    It seems to me that something is slowing your system down but your PC spec suggests that FS should be OK with this (although perhaps 1024MB of RAM would make it run more nicely).

    Do you have any other software running along with FS?

    What sort of joystick have you got?

    Have you got the latest drivers for your video card?

    in reply to: Editing aircraft #239936
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    You’ll need a paint programme of some sort and DXTBMP by Martin Wright. The latter can be found here:
    http://www.mnwright.btinternet.co.uk/

    Using layers (as, for example, in Photoshop or Paintshop Pro) works best because you can edit/delete to your heart’s content without altering the base textures.

    in reply to: AFCAD Palma #239938
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    There’s a lot here:
    http://afcad.projectai.com/

    Not sure if they have that version but do a search under LEPA. You don’t have to register or log in.

    in reply to: Approach #239950
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    Try Beef Island (TUPJ) – if you’ve seen the Caribbean Props Osprey book you’ll know what I mean!

    Others to try:
    Rio Amazonas (SESM)
    Portland NAS (EGDP)
    St Barthelemy (TFFJ)
    Bhojpur (VNBJ)
    Saba (SABA)
    Paro (VQPR)

    I’m certain some of these cannot possibly be true to life. SESM is probably the biggest challenge but as real as it gets? Probably not.

    [Portland isn’t far off how it really is but then very few fixed wing aircraft have ever landed there.]

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1420404
    uksceneryman
    Participant
    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1420408
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    How about this 727 in Brazil?

    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/614005/L/

    By the way, there was another low flying B-17 shot on here a few weeks ago but I can’t find it now. Vould it be posted again?

    in reply to: bmi A321 for FS2002…? #240280
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    fsbmi321.zip on flightsim.com.

    Requires FSP_MDL.ZIP. Model by FSPainter.

    in reply to: Fairford Scenery #240283
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    Not sure of the answer here but there’s a very active forum for this and other titles here:
    http://www.visualflight.co.uk/forums/

    in reply to: FlyPast and JF Spitfire #240422
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    Although I already bought the pack 😮 , I’m very curious to see what they have written. Of to the press shop.

    J.V.

    Is it me or does the FlyPast reviewer base most of what he/she says on press releases?

    Likewise, it seems that the screen shots used often come from publishers as well so just how much time does this person take over these things?

    I’m afraid I go elsewhere if I want to see a proper review; other mags seem to at least have reviewers who are clearly flight sim enthusiasts.

    in reply to: spruce goose #240425
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    I’ve found one for FS2004 – sprgoo04.zip on flightsim.com and also one for FS98 but sadly no joy on FS2002.

    🙁

    in reply to: Round the world in FS2004 #240429
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    I’ve been round the World in every flight sim since FSW95 at least.

    I seem to recall someone posting a set of flight plans for going round the world in FS2002 or FS2004 on flightsim.com a while ago … might be worth a look.

    I’ve done my flights using mainly the Lear, Baron or 737. Anything more and all you’re likely to do is fly high and fairly fast and miss all the fun to be had by looking at the scenery below.

    Last time I went on a Westerly route and tried going via Alaska and then island hopping across to Russia, which I found a bit more interesting than across the Pacific to Hawaii.

    Have fun!

    in reply to: RAF Abingdon airfield for sim #240839
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    British Airports by Just Flight was originally done by Gary Summons of UK2000 scenery and I’ve checked his site (see here:http://www.uk2000scenery.com/) and Abingdon is not included, nor is it in the default sim.

    I’ve checked on flightsim.com and avsim.com and Abingdon isn’t listed there either!

    One final check: I ran AFCAD2 and can’t find Abingdon listed so I’ve now drawn a blank.

    in reply to: Airport editing #240847
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    Adding a terminal is relatively easy; you could use something like the airport software – see here:
    http://www.airportforwindows.com/
    Don’t be fooled by the front page – it is for FS2004 as well.

    As for removing things, well I think you’ll achieve that by creating an exclude file.

    There is a UK scenery Yahoo! list with people on it who could help further. I can give you more details if you like.

    in reply to: JustFlight Spitfire pack #240853
    uksceneryman
    Participant

    I know it’s a bit late for a campaign to put honesty back into advertising, but a promotional push along the lines of – “Here’s a load of Spitfire variants we produced ourselves to a quality standard varying from not bad to indifferent” isn’t going to do much for sales, but at least it would be honest.

    What a nice idea … and how wonderful if we could get all software publishers to go along with a bit of honesty?

    Trouble is that we do need *all* to take this idea on board and the standard across the board seems to be hype it up. In that respect JF are certainly not the worst offender …

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 98 total)