dark light

Devils Advocate

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 338 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2086517
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    Personally, I do not believe that the EU should lift the embargo, and if the French government sells Rafale to china it would only prove that they care more about business than moral values.

    No nation should trade weapons with a country that shoots refugees or commits other henious human rights violations.

    You mean like in Iraq when when little girls are stalked and then followed to their homes and raped and murdered along with their families to eliminate witnesses.

    in reply to: J-10 versus LCA-AESA #2550759
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    If PLAAF does not release much info on the J10’s specs progress of induction etc., how can it’s progress be compared to the LCA in whose case the information is 400% reliable and released to the public. There are several forumites on this board who monitor and verify ADA releases independently.

    LCA reliable information? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    What ever happened to the 100% indigenous LCA? Boy how many times have we heard about everything about the LCA and turns out to be not the case at all? That’s called lying!

    in reply to: Beijing secretly fires lasers to disable US satellites #2557078
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    According to senior American officials: “China not only has the capability, but has exercised it.” American satellites like the giant Keyhole craft have come under attack “several times” in recent years.

    Apparently you should read again. Hmmm, I wonder if you’re trying to make a difference on the type of satellite. Really no difference no matter how you spin it.

    in reply to: Beijing secretly fires lasers to disable US satellites #2557190
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    The US was claiming the USSR was “dazzling” some of their satellites back in the 80’s (with the US likely returning the favor). I imagine in the ensuing 20+ years they’ve come up with policies/countermeasures to deal with the problem.

    Apparently not since US spy satellites are being blinded over China.

    in reply to: Beijing secretly fires lasers to disable US satellites #2557452
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    You have to prove who did it.

    I remember back around the late 80s/early 90s a primary weather satellite over the West Coast of the US used for the TV news stations mysteriously blacked-out permanently. They had to use the satellite over the central US to observe the weather for the West Coast. So they were handicapped looking further out into the Pacific for several years until another satellite replaced it. There was talk that it was knocked out by some anti-satellite system test by either Russia or even the US since those two at the time had anti-satellite systems being developed.

    Remember when the US was testing anti-satellite rockets launched from F-15s?

    in reply to: J-10 versus LCA-AESA #2558316
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    I remember when there were those first spy satellite photos revealing the J-10 there was a story on NBC news where US military officials called it a stealth fighter that was hard to see on radar.

    in reply to: J-10 versus LCA-AESA #2558698
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    Wasn’t there articles posted in this forum at the beginning of the year saying that the LCA was going into production by June?

    Might as well speculate a 2010 J-10 variant versus an LCA.

    in reply to: Viet Nam.. What If? #2559325
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    That was all after the fact. You’re avoiding the question.

    Still was a puppet government. That’s the way to get governments to do what you want by picking who and putting strings on them. Plus it was the Cold War and the “domino theory” that got the US into Southeast Asia, not the South Vietnamese crying for help.

    in reply to: Viet Nam.. What If? #2559346
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    How about the US installed a puppet government in the south? The corrupt Vus, right? Stemming from a US backed assassination? Then there was the lie about the US being attacked that started the whole mess.

    in reply to: Viet Nam.. What If? #2560771
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    Iraq is not going so well even with all that military might. Iraq has shown Vietnam wasn’t unique. Which means not so good for the US.

    What about the geo-political situation or are you just talking military? I don’t really think you can separate the two. Are world politics the same, i.e. Cold War?

    Back then Americans suffered 50k deaths. I don’t think Americans today can accept those numbers. Or are you assuming those numbers will go down? I don’t see that situation being any different. Same jungle, same problems.

    I’m sure there are no holds barred for the US side, but the Vietnamese are another story, right? I’m sure today, realistically, if Vietnam wanted to get a nuke, they would be able to find a way just any other nation can today.

    in reply to: J-XX mockup? #2569420
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    I’m sure you interpreted my post as anger to salvage your illogical conclusions. I only happily inject the truth in here. So if you have a problem with your own illogic being applied, well… I don’t really care, space cadet.

    in reply to: J-XX mockup? #2569580
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    I will. The Red Chinese ain’t so good at something like this. Hell, their antiship missile couldn’t even sink a frakin’ corvette. :dev2:

    It wasn’t their missile. It was a licensed Iranian copy. Let’s go by your illogic and go with what people like you say that the Chinese stole the technology for their anti-ship missiles from the US. Ergo, doesn’t that make American technolgy “ain’t so good?”

    You’re making such conclusions while there is a cover-up over the incident? A dud doesn’t say anything. How many dud Tomahawks lay about the Iraq and Afghanistan landscape?

    The technology did hit an advanced Western stealth design when it wasn’t suppose to. That’s all that really matters. And don’t give me that bull about what mode their defenses were on. The ship was designed for that theater and funny how intelligence sources didn’t know about Hezzbollah having these missiles before the incident, which would be the excuse if they didn’t really know about the enemy’s capabilities, but immediately knew what and where these missiles came from afterwards. So they quite obviously knew they had such advanced weapons before so they should’ve been prepared. Meaning that missile defeated defences meant for that weapon. So you can spin it anyway you want to make yourself feel better.

    in reply to: Aegis and supersonic antiship missiles. . . #1808613
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    If it was seen, why wasn’t the alarm sounded? No one knew until the missile hit.

    The missile hit the capital of country the US launched operations from. There was a failure somewhere.

    in reply to: Aegis and supersonic antiship missiles. . . #1808630
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    Well that Seersucker launched from Iraq that hit Kuwait City wasn’t seen by Patriots, AWACS, or Aegis. That was an obsolete missile versus state of the art sensors.

    in reply to: Those Hezbollah "Ball Bearing" Rocket Warheads #1811656
    Devils Advocate
    Participant

    So why are they complaining about ball bearings? What do they expect? The warheads packed with nerf balls?

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 338 total)