You look like you’ve got a great place to take photos there.
Just a question what equipment are you using, looks a little bit blurry (hope you dont mind the constructive criticism!). If its just the weather, maybe a tripod? (I just got one :D, though not tested it in an airport environment yet!)
*wonders no more*
bet you had a whale of a time with that one
*wonders no more*
bet you had a whale of a time with that one
If you are an air-cadet, try and get a flying scholarship, I did and got my first 30 hours free at age 17, I ended up with my PPL before my driving licence!
Couldn’t agree more. I never did my Flying Scholarship because by time I had the free time to commit to it properly, I was on my way to university.
I did however do my Gliding Scholarship which gave me 10 hours in a motor glider (Grob 109: Vigilant) which has been so so valuable to me when I started my PPL lessons.
I had had lessons in airmanship, aircraft handling, I had stalled an aircraft and successfully recovered, I had done engine failures and been in a circuit with some (basic) radio ops.
A fantastic experience never forgotten, for any young person with even the slightest hint of an interest in flying, the ATC is very much for you!
If my computer could cope with such stunning graphics, I dont think I’d ever leave FS alone.
If my computer could cope with such stunning graphics, I dont think I’d ever leave FS alone.
hmmm, theres something awfully fishy about this story 😀
(wonders who will be first to correct the inaccuracy…)
hmmm, theres something awfully fishy about this story 😀
(wonders who will be first to correct the inaccuracy…)
At a lower altitude, the air is more dense. As altitude increases, the density decreases, and the energy required to heat this air will also reduce.
The less energy required, the lower the fuel to air ratio required and hence, a lower fuel consumption at a higher altitude.
I reckon Deano may be able to go into a bit more detail about this from his groundschool stuff, but thats what I can pick out of after a brief glimpse through my Aerospace Technology 1 Module notes!
Engine type naturally has an effect on the amount of fuel burnt, a 727 for example will typically (over a flight) burn more fuel than the latest efficient turbofans. The SFC (specific fuel consumption) is the amount of fuel burnt in kg per kg of thrust per unit time, my notes sadly are in American units, for example a Tornado’s RB199 engine has an SFC of 1.76 lbs/hr/lbs (courtesy of the afterburner), compared to the RB211 on a 747 which has 0.363!
The lower the better for fuel consumption! 😉
And what, exactly did you learn? :diablo:
I must apologise for my error
(damn typo police :rolleyes: )
As far as I am aware there isn’t an A330 flying for the RAF.
It would certainly be interesting to see whether Airbus would decide to make cargo conversions with announcement of the 747-X and the 777 frieghters, or will they rely purely on the 380F and A300F to do the job for them.
Could be worse, did anyone see Concorde:Airport 79? I never knew Concorde could do at least 2 full rolls without stalling, crashing or over-stressing the airframe!
Ellitas…never apologise for asking questions. Questions are what we use to learn new and exciting things!
Oooo if we are posting photos:

I got to lean out of that side door whilst we flew over scotland, a rather enjoyable thing for a 14 year old (at the time) to do 😀
I think those seats are just lobbed on there to give the test crews something to sit on, as supposed to a customer option?
Heh I actually meant to keep training going etc but yes indeed that as well.
I am very fortunate in that I have secured (though from sad circumstances) the money to fund my PPL and to keep going at least until I can raise the money for the next stage (going modular route to ATPL). it’s the wasted hours now I will have to spend proving to an instructor that I do know it and just needed a refresher that annoys me!
12 hours every two years to stay qualed if I remember rightly?