dark light

murph

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 470 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A few shots from a very cold and Wet LBA 20/01/06 #565454
    murph
    Participant

    You look like you’ve got a great place to take photos there.

    Just a question what equipment are you using, looks a little bit blurry (hope you dont mind the constructive criticism!). If its just the weather, maybe a tripod? (I just got one :D, though not tested it in an airport environment yet!)

    in reply to: General Discussion #366487
    murph
    Participant

    *wonders no more*

    bet you had a whale of a time with that one

    in reply to: Whale In The Thames #1950771
    murph
    Participant

    *wonders no more*

    bet you had a whale of a time with that one

    in reply to: PPL #409997
    murph
    Participant

    If you are an air-cadet, try and get a flying scholarship, I did and got my first 30 hours free at age 17, I ended up with my PPL before my driving licence!

    Couldn’t agree more. I never did my Flying Scholarship because by time I had the free time to commit to it properly, I was on my way to university.

    I did however do my Gliding Scholarship which gave me 10 hours in a motor glider (Grob 109: Vigilant) which has been so so valuable to me when I started my PPL lessons.

    I had had lessons in airmanship, aircraft handling, I had stalled an aircraft and successfully recovered, I had done engine failures and been in a circuit with some (basic) radio ops.

    A fantastic experience never forgotten, for any young person with even the slightest hint of an interest in flying, the ATC is very much for you!

    in reply to: Post your FS screenshots here! #1612501
    murph
    Participant

    If my computer could cope with such stunning graphics, I dont think I’d ever leave FS alone.

    in reply to: Post your FS screenshots here! #1615966
    murph
    Participant

    If my computer could cope with such stunning graphics, I dont think I’d ever leave FS alone.

    in reply to: General Discussion #366493
    murph
    Participant

    hmmm, theres something awfully fishy about this story 😀

    (wonders who will be first to correct the inaccuracy…)

    in reply to: Whale In The Thames #1950777
    murph
    Participant

    hmmm, theres something awfully fishy about this story 😀

    (wonders who will be first to correct the inaccuracy…)

    in reply to: PW JT8D query #565458
    murph
    Participant

    At a lower altitude, the air is more dense. As altitude increases, the density decreases, and the energy required to heat this air will also reduce.

    The less energy required, the lower the fuel to air ratio required and hence, a lower fuel consumption at a higher altitude.
    I reckon Deano may be able to go into a bit more detail about this from his groundschool stuff, but thats what I can pick out of after a brief glimpse through my Aerospace Technology 1 Module notes!

    Engine type naturally has an effect on the amount of fuel burnt, a 727 for example will typically (over a flight) burn more fuel than the latest efficient turbofans. The SFC (specific fuel consumption) is the amount of fuel burnt in kg per kg of thrust per unit time, my notes sadly are in American units, for example a Tornado’s RB199 engine has an SFC of 1.76 lbs/hr/lbs (courtesy of the afterburner), compared to the RB211 on a 747 which has 0.363!

    The lower the better for fuel consumption! 😉

    in reply to: Most interesting aircraft you've been on? #569502
    murph
    Participant

    And what, exactly did you learn? :diablo:

    I must apologise for my error

    (damn typo police :rolleyes: )

    in reply to: cargo version ? #569717
    murph
    Participant

    As far as I am aware there isn’t an A330 flying for the RAF.

    It would certainly be interesting to see whether Airbus would decide to make cargo conversions with announcement of the 747-X and the 777 frieghters, or will they rely purely on the 380F and A300F to do the job for them.

    in reply to: sorry another question #569718
    murph
    Participant

    Could be worse, did anyone see Concorde:Airport 79? I never knew Concorde could do at least 2 full rolls without stalling, crashing or over-stressing the airframe!

    Ellitas…never apologise for asking questions. Questions are what we use to learn new and exciting things!

    in reply to: Most interesting aircraft you've been on? #569719
    murph
    Participant

    Oooo if we are posting photos:

    http://www.hmfriends.org.uk/images/chinsun70.jpg

    I got to lean out of that side door whilst we flew over scotland, a rather enjoyable thing for a 14 year old (at the time) to do 😀

    in reply to: Size of A380 upper deck #570602
    murph
    Participant

    I think those seats are just lobbed on there to give the test crews something to sit on, as supposed to a customer option?

    in reply to: PPL #410855
    murph
    Participant

    Heh I actually meant to keep training going etc but yes indeed that as well.

    I am very fortunate in that I have secured (though from sad circumstances) the money to fund my PPL and to keep going at least until I can raise the money for the next stage (going modular route to ATPL). it’s the wasted hours now I will have to spend proving to an instructor that I do know it and just needed a refresher that annoys me!

    12 hours every two years to stay qualed if I remember rightly?

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 470 total)