dark light

JJ

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 236 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #415365
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: Iraq : who’s in?

    Geforce, the EU has never been united on foreign policy

    in reply to: Iraq : who's in? #1983755
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: Iraq : who’s in?

    Geforce, the EU has never been united on foreign policy

    in reply to: General Discussion #415642
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: In memory of victims of 9/11.. please all sign!

    Jonathan Reuveny

    Netherlands

    in reply to: In memory of victims of 9/11.. please all sign! #1983902
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: In memory of victims of 9/11.. please all sign!

    Jonathan Reuveny

    Netherlands

    in reply to: General Discussion #416121
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: UN security council

    With all due respect PLAwolf, but I don’t think that the US has any other responsiblities than to look after the interests of it’s own people, and perhaps that of it’s allies. In my view the US is not responsible for all the bad things in the world (and neither for all that’s good), and is not solely responsible, if at all, for solving the world’s problems.

    I do agree with you, however, that the UN is not a very usefull in most respects. In particular the veto power of permanent members of the UNSC has a very negative effect on the way the organization works. While during the Cold War this system undoubtedly helped to prevent the Cold War from ever turning into a ‘Hot War’, the negative effects are clearly distinguishable. Another problem with the UN is that the members are often undemocratic countries, which don’t care about human life, but only about their current regimes remaining in power. The effects of this too, are clearly visible. And lastly, with Lybia becoming the chair of the UN Human Rights Commission I cannot understand how anyone can take that commission serious anymore.

    Shalom,

    Jonathan

    in reply to: UN security council #1984125
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: UN security council

    With all due respect PLAwolf, but I don’t think that the US has any other responsiblities than to look after the interests of it’s own people, and perhaps that of it’s allies. In my view the US is not responsible for all the bad things in the world (and neither for all that’s good), and is not solely responsible, if at all, for solving the world’s problems.

    I do agree with you, however, that the UN is not a very usefull in most respects. In particular the veto power of permanent members of the UNSC has a very negative effect on the way the organization works. While during the Cold War this system undoubtedly helped to prevent the Cold War from ever turning into a ‘Hot War’, the negative effects are clearly distinguishable. Another problem with the UN is that the members are often undemocratic countries, which don’t care about human life, but only about their current regimes remaining in power. The effects of this too, are clearly visible. And lastly, with Lybia becoming the chair of the UN Human Rights Commission I cannot understand how anyone can take that commission serious anymore.

    Shalom,

    Jonathan

    in reply to: General Discussion #416139
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: UN security council

    As if the US is the only country to use it’s veto in the UNSC…

    in reply to: UN security council #1984148
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: UN security council

    As if the US is the only country to use it’s veto in the UNSC…

    in reply to: General Discussion #416537
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: A Few Computer Questions

    WinXP may just tbe the problem you’re searching, PII. WinXP doesn’t support all games, and many old games may not run good and maybe not run at all. Also, I don’t see why you would have rpoblems with F-15. I don’t have a 3Dfx card and it looks fine.

    in reply to: A Few Computer Questions #1984380
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: A Few Computer Questions

    WinXP may just tbe the problem you’re searching, PII. WinXP doesn’t support all games, and many old games may not run good and maybe not run at all. Also, I don’t see why you would have rpoblems with F-15. I don’t have a 3Dfx card and it looks fine.

    in reply to: General Discussion #417521
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: Cookies and more

    Geforce, I do warn you to watch out with Ad-Aware. First back-up everything you want to delete before you relly delete it. There’s a function for it in Ad-Aware. My dad’s PC was once infected with hundreds of files of spyware. A program even replaced Win-sock with it’s own version! Ad-aware threw it away, but Windows refused to install a new one. I had to format the entire C: drive and reinstall everything thanks to lousy spyware.

    in reply to: Downloading : how dangerous is it? #1984965
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: Cookies and more

    Geforce, I do warn you to watch out with Ad-Aware. First back-up everything you want to delete before you relly delete it. There’s a function for it in Ad-Aware. My dad’s PC was once infected with hundreds of files of spyware. A program even replaced Win-sock with it’s own version! Ad-aware threw it away, but Windows refused to install a new one. I had to format the entire C: drive and reinstall everything thanks to lousy spyware.

    in reply to: General Discussion #417837
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: Downloading : how dangerous is it?

    GZYL, that’s basically what Ad-Aware does.

    in reply to: Downloading : how dangerous is it? #1985134
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: Downloading : how dangerous is it?

    GZYL, that’s basically what Ad-Aware does.

    in reply to: General Discussion #417845
    JJ
    Participant

    RE: Downloading : how dangerous is it?

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 01-09-02 AT 10:31 PM (GMT)]There’s a program called Ad-Aware that checks your system for spyware and the like. I use it for quite a few years now, first on my dad’s computer (which was badly infected with spyware thanks to Kazaa and IMesh) and now on my own. I have no problems with spyware anymore these days. You can find the program at http://www.lavasoftusa.com.

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 236 total)