dark light

Dubya

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 528 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Netherlands signs for JSF #2517162
    Dubya
    Participant

    Not too keen on the European success of the F-35, It is effectively destroying the European fighter industry due to a lack of export orders. Especially when you take into consideration that Ialy has more F-35’s planned (131) than Eurofighters (121). Meanwhile the Rafale is an absolute export flop (maybe 1 small order by Morrocco which is unconfirmed), while the Gripen and Eurofighter are only minor successes outside their countries of origin.

    in reply to: Saudi Eurofighters under threat? #2517172
    Dubya
    Participant

    If this is true, then what irony that a bunch of zealot religious fundamentalists indulge in such promiscious and decadent behaviour.

    Their own women can’t go out in public unless covered and accompanied by a male relative, but Western prostitutes are all the rave…

    in reply to: Russia offers MIG-29SMT to Egypt #2522005
    Dubya
    Participant

    I seriously doubt Egypt would acquire MiG’s. They acquire either US because the Yanks subsidise it through FMS or Chinese because they can licence produce/assemble it and therefore obtain technology and prop up their own air industry (i.e. the K-8).

    I didn’t mention the French because the acquisition of French aircraft by the Egyptians has dried up over the last 15 years.

    in reply to: Iranian Light Plane-Identity and details please!! #2532614
    Dubya
    Participant

    Lycoming engines?

    I thought exports of US aviation parts to Iran was prohibited? Or are they acquiring them on the second hand market or using existing stocks?

    Dubya
    Participant

    Isn’t the F-22 production line closing in the next couple of years?

    in reply to: PAF Airstrike #2532636
    Dubya
    Participant

    So it was officially a school?

    I know Islamic fundamentalist funbunnies use schools as terror camps but this sort of raid won’t be winning the Pakistani government any votes.

    I still think terrorism should be combated via police/civil means and not by arbitrary military power. Blowing things up with massive US sponsored/supplied firepower only enhances the image of terrorists as freedom fighters.

    in reply to: Beriev gets to build Be-2500! #2532646
    Dubya
    Participant

    Perhaps the Ruskis are doing some long term planning and taking into account global warming.

    I mean when the world’s airports are underwater giant ekranoplans will make a lot of sense.

    I like the thing. It harkens back to the old days when aviation was about pushing limits and trying out new things.

    Modern aviation is boring – the F-22 and A380 are for all intents and purposes very conventional.

    in reply to: PAF Airstrike #2532655
    Dubya
    Participant

    I heard it was an Islamic school and there could be serious repurcussions.

    in reply to: Dubya's random musings on random airforces #2537852
    Dubya
    Participant

    I actually don’t think more F-22’s are the answer. In fact perhaps acquisitions of F-16E/F’s or even F/A-18E/F’s should be considered to maintain USAF fleets at optimum levels.

    in reply to: Dubya's random musings on random airforces #2537911
    Dubya
    Participant

    It’s true that the F-16C-50 is a much different beast to the F-16A. However the US has not acquired that many evolved F-16’s or F-15’s over the last 5 years. Many units are still operating Block 30’s and older Block 40’s and will continue to do so until the F-35 enters service (and I am not optimistic on the estimated F-35 service entry date).

    Take into account attrition and you have a decreasing fighter fleet in terms of numbers and as airframes age, capability.

    Upgrading aircraft of course alters this, but one can only update an aircraft so much. And upgrades don’t make up for lost numbers or increased aircraft unavailability due to age (more things breaking down).

    Menawhile the Navy’s acquisition of F/A-18E/F’s ensures it’s fleet is relatively new and restocked.

    in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2085729
    Dubya
    Participant

    What’s the difference between selling arms to Saudi Arabia or Pakistan or China?

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Sept-Oct 06 #2544741
    Dubya
    Participant

    Found only this article outlining the actual exercise between 43rd Sqn RAF and the IAF (Indradhanush 06’).

    http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1820174,0008.htm

    Before Phalcons, a crash course

    Rahul Singh
    Gwalior, October 14, 2006

    With the Indian Air Force preparing to induct its first Phalcon AWACS or the airborne early warning and control system next year, the Indo-UK air exercise ‘Indradhanush 06’ appeared to have provided just the right setting for the force to undergo a “crash course” on the use of the airborne system.

    The IAF’s combat pilots gained a firsthand understanding of operating in an AWACS environment as the Royal Air Force’s E3D Sentry AWACS came to India to exploit the full potential of its Tornado F3 intercepters that are taking part in the exercise.

    Air Marshal K.D. Singh, senior air staff officer, Central Air Command, said on Friday, “Learning how to exploit the AWACS platform is crucial as Phalcon induction begins next year. The Sentry’s support helped pilots to position themselves on advantageous coordinates.” IAF’s fighter controllers also flew on the Sentry to figure out how their counterparts facilitated airspace control.

    The IAF went into the 10-day exercise, which ended on Friday, with Su-30 MKIs, Mirage 2000 fighters, MiG-27s and MiG-21s. In the face of such a formidable line-up, it must have been quite a challenge for the 43 (Fighter) Squadron of the RAF to live up to its motto of Gloria finis —‘Glory is the end’.

    The Tornado aces did have a slight edge over IAF top guns in the sense that Indian fighters were not compatible with the AWACS downlink transmissions. Air Commodore K.G. Bewoor, AOC, Gwalior airbase, told the Hindustan Times, “Their situational awareness was better. But our pilots were also in the loop since they were getting voice updates from AWACS over radio telephone.”

    But the objective of Indradhanush was not to antagonise or prove superiority. So no one talked about the kill and miss ratio.

    The aim was to cement friendship, exchange operational concepts and derive maximum training value. Air Vice Marshal Christopher Harper, chief of staff (operations), RAF Strike Command, said, “We exercised as opposing and collaborative forces. The exercise has strengthened the foundation of a burgeoning friendship and joint operational capability. That’s important in an uncertain world.”

    The Fighting Cocks, as the 43 Squadron is called, simply went gaga over the Su-30 MKI. RAF’s exercise director Air Commodore Julian Stinton said, “Some RAF pilots flew on the Sukhoi and returned with silly grins. It’s an awesome fighter.”

    Initially, pilots from both sides struggled with “communication barriers.” But soon they were on the same wavelength, which helped in graduating from less complex missions to more demanding operational tasks in a “building block approach.”

    The exercise also involved mid-air refuellers — IAF’s IL-78 and RAF’s VC-10, which operated from the Agra airbase.

    Not sure how reliable the Hindustan Times are, but the article does acknowledge that the RAF had an advantage with their E-3D AWACS (which is to be expected).

    Also interesting that the RAF pilots were really extremely pleased with the Su-30MKI (whether this is just propaganda is debatable).

    in reply to: KAI A-50 to become 'FA-50' with AESA radar and datalink #2558490
    Dubya
    Participant

    I’d say that the South Korea wants to continue developing as a major player ithe North Asian region. A domestic aviation industry will help facilitate ths as a symbol of prestige as well as developing technical abilities.

    Furthermore the South Korean AF is adopting the F/A-50 as a marketing element in order to assure te minds of potential export customers that the aircraft is sound. Nowadays if an aircraft is not operated by the country of origin it rarely has any chance of being adopted elsewhere.

    in reply to: One Bloody Harrier !!!!!!! #2559228
    Dubya
    Participant

    Is it just me or has Britsh military planning been a joke since the 1950’s when they decided to replace all manned aircraft with missiles?

    in reply to: Chilean Mirage… #2559239
    Dubya
    Participant

    I think they are being retired in favour of new-build and ex-Dutch F-16’s.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 528 total)