dark light

Dubya

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 528 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Invasion of Venezuela? #2609179
    Dubya
    Participant

    What will the primer be though.
    How will the US justify an attack on a democratically elected leader of a country?

    Didn’t stop them in Chile in 1973 – it wasn’t an overt attack but the CIA organised Allende’s overthrow. Similar things have happened in other Central America countries in the last 50 years. The U.S. policy for Latin America still seems to revolve around the Monroe Doctirne in which the USA maintains the right to intervene in any Latin American country that gets out of line.

    in reply to: Czech Gripens delivered and accepted #2611948
    Dubya
    Participant

    So when do the MiG-21’s retire?

    in reply to: Will the Kiwi's ever have an airforce again? #2612618
    Dubya
    Participant

    I think you used your Canberras in Malaya, everybody help is welcome, for instance in Allied Force Italy & Germany were the Backbone of ECRs with their Tornados with capabilities that the US didn’t have.

    Yes, but a few F-16’s is not something the US really needs – they have plenty of fighter-bombers. I think I mentioned before that a lot of the aircraft deployed by NATO partners during Kosovo were near useless – they lacked precision strike and all weather capabilties. Not to mention political limitations that New Zealand would impose on the use of their fighters (another problem in Kosovo).

    In reality the lack of coaltion partners suited US war planners as it meant that the US had virtually no political opposition to the conduct of the war within their own allied ranks.

    And then just one question, if somebody hijack a plan and is going to crash it on New Zealand parlament what are you ganna do ?? Hope that an Australian F18 is in the surrounding !!!!

    And what are you gonna do when evil aliens try to take over New Zealand? Wait for Will Smith save your ass?

    in reply to: Japan's new fighter #2613177
    Dubya
    Participant

    it’d be kick ass to see a JSDF F-22 with the F-2’s camouflage scheme..

    but too bad, Japan should really consider license building the X-32 :diablo:

    Is this because it’s ugly and a lot of Japanese anime has an obsession with things being ugly (e.g. the so-called “steam punk” genre or just plain ugly characters?)

    in reply to: Will the Kiwi's ever have an airforce again? #2613178
    Dubya
    Participant

    Perhaps I should shout it?

    A DOZEN SKYHAWKS OR F-16S FOR THAT MATTER WOULD NOT HELP ANYONE.
    WE HAVE NOT NEGLECTED DEFENCE, OURS OR ANYONE ELSES.
    WE HAVE INCREASED DEFENCE SPENDING, NOT REDUCED IT.
    WE HAVE REMOVED A CAPABILITY WE HAVE NEVER USED AND WERE NOT LIKELY TO USE IN THE FUTURE.

    Get over it.

    Right on!!

    in reply to: Will the Kiwi's ever have an airforce again? #2613187
    Dubya
    Participant

    Received this today, seems there are a number of different opinions on this matter inside New Zealand. 🙂

    Wow, that some of the most poorly conceived right wing propaganda I’ve ever seen.

    The so-called “facts” are some of the most moronic I’ve ever seen.

    For example, the “bought liberty to millions of people in the Communist world.” As far as I can recall most people in the Communist got fed up with Communism and toppled it themselves (the Poles, Czechs etc) or descended into bloody conflict (Balkans, Armenia, Georgia etc). Furthermore the fall of communism led to a real decline in the living standars of people. And then there’s the people who were “liberated” from Communism by being obliterated by U.S. bombs in Vietnam and Korea, or who were tortured and executed by U.S. sponsored regimes.

    Then the U.S. did not save Australia and New Zealand from the Japanese out of the goodness of its heart, but rather cause Japan openly attacked U.S. territory in Hawaii and the Philippines.

    Afghanistan’s democracy is a f**king joke. Real control still resides in the hands of scummy warlords who are often tied to opium smugglers. Yet in that article I don’t see a “the USA helps your kid get wasted by indirectly supporting opium smuggling in Afghanistan.”

    I could go on, but it’s pointless.

    I know that freedom of speech is a democratic right, but perhaps there should be laws preventing blatant misinformation. This should apply to all aspects of politics, left or right or centrist, as well as those w**kers in the media.

    RANT MODE OFF 😀

    in reply to: Japan's new fighter #2613963
    Dubya
    Participant

    It would not surprise me if the Japanese do go for the F/A-22. The Japanese have always opted for the best fighter avaiable (F-4, F-15 (please no-onme mention the F-104 :p )).

    And with the Chinese acquiring large numbers of Flankers and Korea going for F-15K’s, the Japanese might be feeling that their air defence capabilities are being eroded. They might especially be worrying after recent protests in China against the Japanese over World War II attrocitiies.

    in reply to: Singapore say No to Eurofighter!!! #2613975
    Dubya
    Participant

    What is Al Yamama?

    I am not biasing anyone, recent history has clearly shown that Britons and Germans simply are not too successful with selling aircraft, except for Hawk. (Buccaneer, Tornado, Lightning). French have performed better even if the 2000 wasn’t that much successful as expected from a Mirage III and Mirage F1 successor. Even relatively successful Alpha Jets and Jaguars have French involvement. So, where is the biasing?

    As far as I recall most of the Jaguar sales were promoted by Britain. The Frenchies weren’t too keen on promoting the Jaguar because it would create competition for the Mirage F1. This also explains why export Jaguars were generally sold to countries with a historial link with Britain (India, Oman, Nigeria). It also explains why most export Jaguar Internationals were more similar to GR1 or T2 standard than to the French A standard.

    As for the success of the Mirage service, it does help that the French had no moral qualms selling thier jets to a variety of nasty dictatorships such as Argentina, Morroco, Libya, Iraq, Zaire, Egypt etc.

    As for British sales, the Brits haven’t really had a multi-role aircraft to promote since the Hunter. The Tornado is highly specialised which is a real no-no in this day and age of multi-role. Many countries still focus on the A2A role and the Tornade F.3 isn’t exactly the best fighter plane for the job.

    Also many former British clients (e.g. Australia, Jordan, Kuwait) have switched to cheaper American aircraft.

    But the Brits have done really well with Hawk, which if I recall correctly, is much mroe successful than the Alhpajet in terms of export sales.

    in reply to: Will the Kiwi's ever have an airforce again? #2613977
    Dubya
    Participant

    Dubya,

    Denmark and Portugal maintain the fast jet force levels they do because they are required to do so by NATO, why else are folk like Hungary, Poland and the Czechs acquiring F-16s and Gripens? Because their newly acquired membership of NATO requires them to. To be a member of NATO requires a nation to have a certain level of military capability, New Zealand is not a member of any such organisation.

    Cheers. I am not exactly aware of the numbers these countries have to contribute to NATO.

    I am certain that aircraft such as the Alphajet provide no useful capability for NATO other than numbers (I am referring to Esq 301, not 103 which is a training squadron). And many U.S. allies lack capabilities that are necessary for joint high intensity combat ops for even thier high end jets (e.g. targetting pods, guided munition reserves).

    Countries such as the Czech Repbulic, Hungary, Denmark etc do require an air policing capability due to their geographic locations. But countries such as Denmark, the Netherlands etc (relatively) operate large numbers of aircraft due to historic amd political reasons, not due to actual operational requirements.

    in reply to: Singapore say No to Eurofighter!!! #2614551
    Dubya
    Participant

    Only Taiwan imo needs to remain primarily focussed on A2A for their own survival and maybe EF could gain some traction there esp if US under chinese pressure denies them the Raptor-E.

    Most countries in the world acquire military equipment specifically according to their own defence needs and do not look to wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as a model of future wars.

    Most non-E.U. countries around the world do not deploy high tech equipment in peace keeping operations or U.S. led coalitions.

    Furthermore a lot of countries around the world have petty disputes with their neighbours and try to maintain an edge over them.

    Therefore A2A is still important to many countries. I doubt Singapore discounts A2A especially as Malaysia may be acquiring Su-30MKM. I’d think that A2A capabilities would be a very important factor to the RSAF. After all a multi-role fighter capable of precision bombing is not worth much if it gets shot down by a superior A2A opponent.

    in reply to: Will the Kiwi's ever have an airforce again? #2614561
    Dubya
    Participant

    New Zealand does not need fighters. The NZ military is geared mainly towards peace keeping operations. These ops generally never have any mandate to use offensive firepower such as air strikes. Therefore any NZ fighter fleet serves no purpose.

    New Zealand’s AF does not serve as a contractor to the RAN or RAAF by providing target training.

    Arguably even in this day and age many of Europe’s Airforces operate aircraft they don’t need. Why does Portugal need 40 F-16’s and 40 Alphajets? Why does Denmark need 3 squadrons of F-16’s?

    These aircraft exist because the military wants them (just like any bureaucracy wants more assets that equal to bigger budgets). Many of these aircraft serve to provide political support to U.S. operations. I remeber reading articles that many of the European aircraft provided for the Kosovo operation were utilised for air defence missions that were not necessary, because the jets lacked true multi-role, all weather capabilities.

    in reply to: Saudis pledge to buy French jets in €6bn deal #2615262
    Dubya
    Participant

    You mean like the BAe F-15I, or M1A2 Abrams tank? The bulk of Saudi Arabia’s arsenal is imported from the US. The Brits have largely been taken over by the US in the desert kingdom as the suppliers for the tools of dictatorship. But then, there are a lot more American former politicians in the Carlyle Group than Brits.

    Oh I wholeheartedly agree (though BAe F-15I – surely you mean Tornado and F-15S?). And now we support dictators in Uzbekistan, Pakistan etc cause of their “valuable” contribution to the war on terror (I s’pose they are referring to the contratced torture services these countries provide?)

    One would’ve thought that after the end of the Cold War, the West would have stopped supporting various dictatorships around the world. But it hasn’t happened. Indeed we are seeing the resumption of the sale of weapons to Pakistan. The only reason the US doesn’y really support dictatorships in SE Asia and Latin America anymore is because the people got sick of oppression and toppled a bunch of US sponsored autocrats (e.g. Suharto, Marcos).

    This is why the Iraq war is a joke. If they said the war was for securing cheap oil or for containing potentially hostile countries such as Iran, Syria or Saudi Arabia, I would’ve supported it (at least they would be honest). But as it’s to bring “democracy and freedom” to the poor Iraqis I find it too hypocritical, especially as former Baathist security personnel are being drafted into public positions.

    At they say, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

    in reply to: Saudis pledge to buy French jets in €6bn deal #2615279
    Dubya
    Participant

    I find it absolutely hilarious that an EU member can sell high tech weapons to feudal Saudi Arabia that has an attrocious human rights record, covertly sponsored terrorist organisations (including the Taliban) and who according to some sources is the biggest importer of torture equipment on the planet (a lot of it made by BAe).

    At the same time there is an arms embargo on China, that also has an attrocious human rights record, but who have not sponsored organisations dedicated to the destruction of the West.

    Gotta love the West’s commitment to democracy, freedom and all that other hippy crap they preach!

    in reply to: Chilean F-16 C Block 50+ "Peace Pumas" #2617030
    Dubya
    Participant

    I read somewhere (maybe in AFM – memory not so good these days) that Chile was looking at acquiring second hand F-16’s and upgrading them as a replacement for the ageing Mirage 5/50’s because brand new Block 50’s are too expensive.

    in reply to: Russian Air Force to purchase 300 Yak-130 trainers #2617543
    Dubya
    Participant

    How realistic is this order? That is, do the Russians have money to acquire new Yak130’s or is this one of those pointless declarations that attempts to make potential export customers more confident about an aircraft that has yet to enter service with its home country?

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 528 total)