dark light

mowers

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 89 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Exact Rafale Delivery Dates and upgrade question #2549993
    mowers
    Participant

    Thank you Kovy,

    So the 8 delayed batch 3 A/C, will they be delivered in 2012 or 2013?

    When will F2s be brought up to F3 standard?

    Will any of the batch 3 F3s get the new Missile warning system, the new optical unit or AESA radar?

    in reply to: Exact Rafale Delivery Dates and upgrade question #2550026
    mowers
    Participant

    Thank you Scorpion82 and arthuro, that was very helpful.

    Am I right in saying that 8 aircraft were removed from batch 3? and that they will be most probably procured with batch 4?

    When will batch 4 be? Or at least when should it be?
    You say batch 4 will be 60 aircraft?
    Does that 60 for batch 4 include or not include the 8 delayed aircraft from Batch 3?
    What chance does batch 4 have of happening?

    When or will the F1 and F2s be upgraded to the batch 3 or 3+ standard?
    Will they all be upgraded or just some?
    If some how many?

    Will batch 3 aircraft be brought up to batch 3+ standerd? And if so when?

    If you don’t know the answer I would still be interested in your opinion.

    Thank you

    Mowers.

    in reply to: v-22 #2504316
    mowers
    Participant

    It was a good article on time magazine. Interesting that they cant really fix the auto rotate at a reasonable cost (why wasnt it built in? cost again I suspect) and the chin gun should be an easy enough modification.

    in reply to: What does everybody think of this? #2504382
    mowers
    Participant

    The problem is Iran and Syria routinely over exaggerate their capabilities and then look a little silly. Look how much Syria and Israel spend on defense, Syrian capabilities are hopelessly outmoded.

    in reply to: How are the Apaches doing in the WOT? #2504445
    mowers
    Participant

    The feedback from the MoD meetings I attend are very positive.

    in reply to: UK Seaking Review #2509127
    mowers
    Participant

    I thought The SAR force and its Seakings were due to wind up in 2013, to be replaced by a civilian agency and types.
    Hence the apparently obsurd situation of relocating 203 Sqn (and sim) from Mawgan to Valley for just a few years.

    And no….Seakings are not cheap to run. Maintenance is expensive and getting harder aswel.

    Of course, I forgot about that.

    in reply to: UK Seaking Review #2509148
    mowers
    Participant

    I believe the SAR ones are going to be in service till 2017.
    Then there is an upgrade planned to keep the support platforms till 2022.
    But what, out of interest, will replace the SAR sea King varients?

    in reply to: UK F-35 question #2509720
    mowers
    Participant

    Wow, thanks guys,

    But does anyone know what the ratio numbers will be and the current delivery schedule is?

    in reply to: Army helecopter crash #2520869
    mowers
    Participant

    Time to accelerate the Puma rebuild program I fear.

    in reply to: New Iranian fighter! (Picture) #2521999
    mowers
    Participant

    Its the “flying arjun jet” 🙂

    http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=18667&sectionid=351020101

    Iran to start jet fighter production
    Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:04:58
    Iranian made fighter, Azarakhsh.
    Iran’s Minister of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics has described the test flight of the country’s second homemade fighter jet as successful.

    Mostafa Mohammad Najjar said the fighter jet, Azarakhsh, would reach industrial production and join the country’s air force soon.

    Azarakhsh, which has been designed and built by Defense Ministry and Hesa Airplane Manufacturing industries’ experts, conducted a successful test flight on Sunday in the central city of Isfahan, where it was built.

    ” The second generation of the homemade fighter jet will be ready for test flight in the not-so-distant future,” the minister announced, adding that a national helicopter, designed by Iran’s Defense Ministry would also be tested soon.

    Najjar praised Iran’s aviation achievements, underlining the country’s self-sufficiency in designing and manufacturing different missiles and their components.

    According to Najjar, Iran’s Defense Ministry, is currently capable of repairing military fighters and passenger planes including Airbus 747.

    “Many regional countries bring their airplanes and helicopters for repair to Iran.”

    Regarding the US decision to demolish F-14 Tomcat fighter jets to prevent the sale of its spare parts to Iran, Najjar noted that the country does not need to purchase F-14 spare parts from the US since ‘we can make the spare parts at home’.

    in reply to: General Discussion #305846
    mowers
    Participant

    Tts got ridiculous.

    We just bought our first home, it cost us nearly half a million quid for a 2 bed flat , its not even in central London.

    in reply to: Housing Supply #1927334
    mowers
    Participant

    Tts got ridiculous.

    We just bought our first home, it cost us nearly half a million quid for a 2 bed flat , its not even in central London.

    in reply to: First moroccan women fighter pilot #2522743
    mowers
    Participant

    A good day for Moroccan woman and Moroccan society. Congratulations Morocco.

    mowers
    Participant

    An active RF MAW like that employed on Eurofighter is probably the single dumbest idea ever put on a jet that is intended to go in harm’s way. Nothing screams “Here I am, come kill me!” like a radiating source that can be detected out to the horizon.

    An electrically quiet airframe with modern processors has the capability to detect, classify and pinpoint SAM and AI radar out to the horizon (this is how F-22 racks up kills using ALR-94). Staring IR detectors can detect a missile plume at great distance, even if it only fills a single pixel in the detector array. The choice, of course, depends upon who is performing the design trade study. Some engineers are better at it than others.

    Hmm, depends on what environment and scenario you are intending to operate the EF2000. I would suggest that its actually quite beneficial in the modern battlefield and the current threat scenarios. I think “the single dumbest idea” is quite harsh no?

    in reply to: Japan to consider F/A-22 to replace its F-4s #2523140
    mowers
    Participant

    I think we can count on a few things:

    1) The F-22 is a step up from existing capability – it appears to be doing very well.

    2) Japan doesnt really need the F-22 right now. It may need it in 15 years but not in 5.

    3) The technology does need to be protected because of the large number of leaks.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 89 total)