dark light

mowers

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 89 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: order of battle info #2523165
    mowers
    Participant

    Military balance
    Flight has a yearly inventory review
    Military almanac

    Those are my favourites. Military balance and the almanac both need cleaning up abit sometimes though.

    Scramble is often missing quite alot of platforms but is often more accurate in numbers and designation types.

    Or just get a Jane’s book on ebay.

    in reply to: IFF Transponders #2523168
    mowers
    Participant

    Thanks very much DJcross.

    I thought that would be the case but I just wanted to be absolutely sure.

    Thanks again

    Mowers

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon news #2523393
    mowers
    Participant

    Whilst this is a nice idea its not straight forward. The cost of adapting the EF2000 for a maritime role would be very significant and the risks very high. It could easily lead to a situation where we have carriers but no aircraft.

    If the JSF falls through the UK would be better off buying Maritime Rafales as part of a contra deal – perhaps the UK building the French carrier for them.

    mowers
    Participant

    Excellent work Jackonicko.
    It appears that the JSF helmet has yet to be awarded which makes working out this whole area much easier.

    mowers
    Participant

    anyone have any information on the JSF helmet mounted system and how this compares?

    mowers
    Participant

    So without going too far off topic.

    With Gerfaut out of the way is the Eurofighter helmet equivalent to the JHMCS?

    mowers
    Participant

    The Topsight-E (i think Topowl-F is its new name) is ready to go with some Mirage 2000 and integrated on indian MiG-29K.
    But it would still need some integration work for the Rafale. (sorry, sometime i really wonder if my grammar is good or not 😀 😀 😀 )

    I have no idea.
    The only official fact is that the Rafale F3 won’t get its helmet mounted sight system as it was previously planned (for 2008). The helmet has been dropped, and hasn’t been ordered at all up to now. It should happen, but simply not yet.
    And in a book published recently, the Topsight-E/Topowl-F was referred as being the Rafale’s HMS, instead of the Gerfaut. Maybe the author of this book wrote a mistake, and this is why i wrote “may replace”. 😉

    I’m afraid we won’t hear about the HMS on Rafale until an export customer ask for it. :confused:

    Pictures here :
    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showpost.php?p=1130817&postcount=786
    I think that the Topsight-E and the Topowl-F are actually the same :
    Thales’ Topowl-F

    Great. So Gerfaut is definitely dead then and the Rafale wont be getting a head mounted EO sight any time in the foreseeable future.

    Has any funding been allocated to put Topsight-E on French Mirage 2000’s? Or is there a date suggested for the addition of Topsight-E on French Mirage 2000’s?

    mowers
    Participant

    Thank you mowers.

    But the problem is that finally, the Gerfaut has been dropped, will not equip the Rafale F3, and yet has to be (re)ordered for later batches.
    And according to latest news :
    -the Thales Topsight-E (or Topowl-F) may replace it for France
    -for export, an israeli solution may be prefered…
    That’s all i can tell you, sorry. It seems that the DGA (délégation générale pour l’armement) has a problem with Sagem, but i don’t really know.

    Thank you, that was facinating.

    So Topsight-E may replace Gerfaut? Do you know what factors will determine this?

    Is Topsight-E ready to go as a system? Or would it require further development to integrate it into the Rafale?

    mowers
    Participant

    Well seeing as Gerfaut is not mounted on the Rafale it compares quite favorably in that department.:p

    Are you sure sealordlawrence? Its just that the sagem website if full of information claiming that they do provide the Gerfaut for the Rafale? Plus here is an interview that went out in all the Paris air show dailys where Sagem were interviewed and claim, at length, they do infact provide the Gerfaut.

    If I am wrong I would be really pleased for any information you might have as this is not an area that I am particularly strong on.

    Thanks again
    Mowers

    http://www.parisairshow2005.com/en/i_1606_1.php

    Thursday June 16
    Gerfaut helmet-mounted display for Rafale: 3 questions for Jean-Christophe Mugler, from Sagem Défense Sécurité

    Sagem Défense Sécurité’s Gerfaut helmet-mounted display was chosen for Rafale air force and navy fighters in 2003. The innovative technologies incorporated in the Gerfault will give Rafale pilots a real advantage in aerial combat. We talked to Jean-Christophe Mugler, deputy director of the military equipment department at Sagem Défense Sécurité.

    What exactly does a helmet-mounted display do?

    A helmet-mounted display, or HMD, considerably increases a fighter’s offensive capabilities, since it allows the pilot to designate a target by simply looking at it, thus directing the air-to-air missile’s sensors and seeker. It goes far beyond the field-of-view covered by a conventional head-up display, without any other limit than the pilot’s ability to turn his head under G loads. Of course, the helmet continues to provide physiological protection, and it can also be used to designate ground targets, by displaying geo-referenced points, or by pre-pointing the sensors. The visor is specially treated to display flight and fire control symbology.

    What are some of the technical features of the Gerfaut HMD?

    Sagem Défense Sécurité won this contract because it had the most innovative solutions, along with timely technology breakthroughs, especially in terms of miniature flat-panel displays and image processing. The Gerfaut uses optronic position detection, which is much easier than the electromagnetic detection devices used previously. The system determines which way the pilot is looking by a precise analysis of the helmet’s movements, using miniature cameras. The Gerfaut system’s electronics are calibrated once and for all during manufacture of the airplane. Each pilot has his own personalized helmet, and can subsequently use it without any restrictions, and without having to worry about the heavy electromagnetic environment inside the cockpit.

    Where does the program stand today?

    A total of 336 Gerfaut HMDs have been ordered for all French air force Rafale pilots, in the F3 version. This same standard is on offer in export markets. We signed the contract in 2004, and the helmet is now being integrated, for delivery to test pilots in early 2006. Production should start in 2007.

    in reply to: State of the Iranian airforce #2523876
    mowers
    Participant

    When I want to know about Iranian air force I look up the various articles on the web by cordesman. There is alot of his stuff on google.

    in reply to: A new Saudi deal with USA ?? #2524124
    mowers
    Participant

    At a rough guess, I would guess:

    – F-15C/D and -S upgrades, with a common GE engine, and perhaps a common AESA radar?

    – AWACS upgrades, new consoles, better ESM and ECM gear etc…

    – JDAMs, possibly JSOWs, Sidewinders and AMRAAMs?

    Possibly add in some transports, renewing their C-130 fleet, if I remember correctly, they were looking at buying some new C-130Js.

    Basically, although it may have an impressive price tag, I doubt there are any big surprises in there, and not much to write home about. I am almost surprised they haven’t looked at buying some F-16s to finally replace their F-5s.

    As it stands, they are probably going to be looking at a force of Typhoons, Tornado GR-4s, F-15C/D and F-15S’, and possibly some Rafales. This makes for an excellent fighter force, at least in terms of equipment!

    AESA and re-engine are almost done deals. Whilst the structure of the Saudi F-15 frames are in good condition.
    The question is whether there will be an avionics upgrade and EW and Comms suite upgrade.

    C-130s need a large upgrade and this has been stated for some time.

    AWACS and the PGWs and Missiles are spot on.

    Perhaps another $8bn in services and support contracts on top of the actual procurement.

    in reply to: Manned Canberra PR9 replacement #2524127
    mowers
    Participant

    ASTOR, Tornado, Watchkeeper and a combination of various satellite sources are the replacement for Canberra.

    in reply to: A new Saudi deal with USA ?? #2524484
    mowers
    Participant

    So what do we think the upgrade will consist of?

    I am guessing an F-15C/D and F-15S upgrade package.

    What upgrades do people think that each of these two aircrafts could recieve?

    I am also guessing an AWACS upgrade?

    Mowers

    in reply to: Iranian Su-30MK deal – up to 250 aircraft? #2524838
    mowers
    Participant

    250? Not a chance…..

    You are looking at $55m a unit without engines. Then there are spares, support and training. Thats an $18bn deal. Iran doesnt have anywhere near that sort of money. It has an annual Defence budget of around $5bn for everything. There is perhaps $1.5-2bn per annum available for procurement. They cant afford to not buy anything but planes for 9 years….

    Who ever wrote this article cant do basic maths.

    in reply to: A new Saudi deal with USA ?? #2524842
    mowers
    Participant

    concerning what in particular?

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 89 total)