Merlin on a P-51B
Here it is, I think, the connection from the coolant tank at the front, just behind the propeller.
Does the winner get the Air Atlantique job, by the way?
Looks rusty inside, could it be a piece of a coolant system, with a couple of securing clamps on it?
A gallant effort to avoid the houses – I sincerely hope that those involved make a speedy and full recovery.
So their web site should correct its name to “what was new”!
ASNV Kathryn Budde-Jones: “Kissimmee Gateway Airport (ISM) was hit hard with damage to each of the five FBOs, and I estimate damage to 70 percent of the airplanes on the field. A tornado collapsed two of Ranger Aviation’s three hangars, destroying many of the planes stored inside of them for safekeeping from the storm. The Warbird Adventures T-6 operation based at the field lost two T-6 Texans and two Bell 47 helicopters in that hangar. Kissimmee Aviation had substantial damage to its hangars and aircraft. Marathon Aviation lost its South Hangar; Sunstate Aviation lost its maintenance hangar and a dozen or more of its flight training planes. The Flying Tigers Warbird Restoration Museum lost 40 feet of its hangar and restoration facility, but the B-17 and B-25 survived intact. The C-47 sustained damaged when it lifted up during the storm and then landed on the three trucks that were weighting it down.”
From http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsitems/2004/040819charley.html
This was covered in an earlier thread, where a Spitfire was tested against an English Electric Lightning. IIRC the Lightning would, with suitable tactics, wipe the floor with the Spitfire.
Now I’ve found the reference (pages 158 and 159 in Alfred Price’s “Spitfire – the complete fighting history”) in which he says:
“Using such tactics (climbing from behind and below then climbing out of range and repeating the process) in the end a competent Lightning pilot could almost always get the better of and equally competent Spitfire (or Mustang) pilot.”
According to “The British Bomber since 1914” by Francis K Mason, “the Warwick was originally conceived as a heavy bomber to complement the smaller Wellington bomber, with which it had much in common.”
My interpretation of this is that the Wellington was designed first and the Warwick immediately afterwards, although its design was later revised to meet the later B.1/35 Spec.
Windsong, It’s one of the first and most important rules of cyberspace! Other items to avoid putting on line are your address and phone number, or anything else that permits you to be identified. That’s what the Private Message (PM) facility is for, but don’t even put sensitive stuff on there until you are sure you are not writing to a nut case (we may have a few on this Forum, who knows?)
That also is why we all have pseudonyms, although some of us “know” each other after a while and put our real names up occasionally. Confusing at first, but you’ll soon get used to it!
Have a nice day!
Nothing else matches a 13.5 Tog duvet!
(And that’s not written in Swedish either!)
My bet would be hollow steel, but I am sure there is someone here who really knows!
After 30 years here, Mike, do you think I could be allowed back into the UK again? It gets blinking cold in the winter! Even brass monkeys feel pain in their nether regions!
How about a piece of bent and broken crankshaft with two big ends still hanging on?
😀
I’m flattered, James!
According to the Winter 1974 Air Classics Quarterly Review, page 39, this was N5672N, originally a P-40E that had a 2-seat business conversion, with the fuselage tank removed and a completely new canopy installed. It later became N151U and Tom Camp painted it in an inaccurate RAF camouflage scheme.