dark light

Papa Lima

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,101 through 2,115 (of 2,888 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Canada Aviation Dakota Moved #1552692
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Two Catalinas at Red Deer

    Found these two from Buffalo Airways in storage at Red Deer in August . . .

    in reply to: RCAF Lancaster #1552696
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Lancasters in Canada

    Here are two of the Lancasters you have in Canada – at Hamilton and at Nanton.

    in reply to: RCAF Lancaster #1552700
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Duxford Lancaster

    Another picture of KB889 at Duxford, from my February 2004 archive.

    in reply to: Boeing in £7m Gatwick investment #641787
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Cheaper than flying them to Seattle!

    in reply to: Forum Members, Who Are we? #1554400
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    You’ve all seen my picture 900 times!
    Plus the one with the Hooters girl, but I’m not going to put that one up again! Most of you should know how to find it if you really want to!

    in reply to: Old Warden season Finale. #1554481
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Is this better, Robbo?

    in reply to: soviet-russian engines #2649291
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    nuke1 and over G, why don’t you two do a lot of research together, collaborate and write the book you obviously both want! I don’t think there would be room in the whole Forum for what you are seeking!

    in reply to: Military Air Demo Teams Question #2649853
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Thank you, everyone, once again the Forum has come up trumps!

    in reply to: soviet-russian engines #2649873
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Bill Gunston’s “The Development of Jet and Turbine Aero Engines” has lots of good information on this topic.

    in reply to: Okay guys and gals- have a crack at these… #1555008
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Strictly speaking, no. 1 is the BAC 221 ogival wing conversion of the Fairey Delta 2, I would say. WG774, first flown in this configuration on May 1, 1964.

    in reply to: Lancaster: The capital ship bomb variant #1555024
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Capital Ship Bomb

    Here are a couple of pics from the same source:
    1. A 45 inch CSB on an adapted 4 000 lb bomb trolley, one of several versions, including one weighing 6 959 lb and filled with Torpex intended for use against Japanese capital ships.
    2. Cross-section of a 38 inch CSB.

    in reply to: Military Air Demo Teams Question #2649949
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    F-15 at Oshkosh 2004

    Here’s a closer look at the first one, perhaps the markings are clearer . . .

    in reply to: Military Air Demo Teams Question #2649969
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Great! You’ll make a modern military out of me yet! I can’t usually recognise any aircraft that was built less than 30 years ago, when I was working with the prototype Tornados.

    in reply to: Lancaster: The capital ship bomb variant #1555134
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    There is an Appendix on the Capital Ship Bomb on pp. 404-405 of Putnam’s “The British Bomber since 1914”.
    This has a photo and a diagram, showing that this is not the Grand Slam or its cousins.
    A full scale trial of the CSB was carried out at Boscombe Down on 8 May 1942 using the 3rd production Mk I Lancaster L7529, its bomb bay having been enlarged by bulging the doors. Although the bomb missed its target on this occasion, production examples were produced and delivered before the end of July 1942 to 106 Sqn for operational use. The first such operation was on the docks at Gdynia on the night of 27/28 August 1942 with 3 Lancasters, byt was a total failure due to unexpected cloud over the target. However large flashes indicated that detonation was satisfactory.

    in reply to: Can you identify this ? #1555135
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    I don’t think a radar signature test would be done with the wheels down, most aircraft need to be detected while their wheels are retracted!

Viewing 15 posts - 2,101 through 2,115 (of 2,888 total)