dark light

Papa Lima

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 2,888 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rank and Vile #1931462
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    You’ve already discovered the greatest mystery of this Forum!

    in reply to: The Day-Glo thread…. #1293338
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    A definitely day-glowed Puma flew past my balcony today, but too far away for my titchy x8 zoom, otherwise I could have put up an acceptable picture! Hope he comes back tomorrow, but a bit closer!

    in reply to: SAAB B17 #1295463
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    My guess is that the wreck is in Ethiopia, which bought 46 B 17As between 1947 and 1953, and used them until 1968.

    in reply to: Watch what you read en route to the US! #525125
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    According to PPrune they had been on a helicopter training course and were on their way home – perfectly innocent and caught up in paranoid American security.

    in reply to: Speedy Spit. #1295998
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    You’ve got the windscreen all wrong – it should be a rounded shape. Otherwise looks good to me.

    in reply to: to good to be forgotten #1297442
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    During my service as a Junior, Corporal, Sergeant and Chief TECHNICIAN, the tool I used most was a soldering iron! Of course we had valves in those days, instead of transistors and microchips.

    in reply to: a provocative thought.. #1299361
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    If they are in the country I am thinking of, surely the dead hand of bureaucracy would rather let them crumble – unless they can be sold for large shedloads of a certain stable currency, with suitable backhanders all over the place!

    in reply to: Twin Ramjet Powered Monoplanes #1300365
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Just what I was about to write, sferrin!
    If the RAF called it a monoplane, then (as an ex-serviceman) I also call it a monoplane.
    After all, it has a main wing each side at the centre, a tailplane near the rear and dispenses with a fin (like the B-2).
    However these pointless arguments can go on forever, so I’ll call a spade a spade and anyone else is free to call it a shovel!

    in reply to: Twin Ramjet Powered Monoplanes #1300369
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    112 (Missile) Sqn originated at Woodhall Spa – I was there and one of the original members. IIRC the CO was a certain Sqn Ldr Middlebrook, the same surname as the author of WWII books, and I always wonder if he is one and the same. Of course we had the new improved Mk 2 Bloodhound.
    We had the aforementioned T87 TIRs (initially in big wooden crates) and one of the first jobs was to lay ducting out for the cabling to the missile launchers. On the radar side we were all recent graduates from a year-long theoretical course at RAF Newton and didn’t take kindly to being employed as general labourers! Little did we know that hidden inside those crates was a whole year or so of putting large-scale Meccano bits together!
    Talk about hands-on!

    in reply to: Twin Ramjet Powered Monoplanes #1302124
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Yes, that’s the one! weighs a ton (not literally but you have to lift it in yourself, and it was about as much as I could carry), then takes several hours to tune up – switch on to full power and “pop”, there she blows, back to start all over again – after you’ve drained the water cooling system, of course. Never seen so much waveguide in all my life before or since, and murderous to tune!
    No scale on the photo, but those klystrons were about 18 inches high and pretty solid metal.
    Thanks for reviving more memories, BigVern, I will have to go to Switzerland soon (was that where the photo came from?)

    in reply to: Is is really 'Discovery Wings' …. #528400
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    I get the Danish version of Discovery (just one channel) and am lucky to get one aircraft programme per month – stop moaning, you UK viewers don’t know how lucky you are!
    As for train programmes, I haven’t seen one yet, but would be very happy to. My train videos are just about worn out (Gresley Pacifics for ever!)

    Papa Lima
    Participant

    After my experience at Frankfurt I put up with a bit of discomfort until we reach cruise!

    in reply to: Twin Ramjet Powered Monoplanes #1302291
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Of course, having sweated blood getting the T87 going (twice) from giant Airfix kits (about 30 tons if I remember correctly) it hurts to see all the glory going to a little monoplane which wouldn’t know the general direction of where to go without our contribution! In fact we guided it all the way up to the proximity fuse lock-on, about 99.9% of the way, eluding jammers and all sorts of cr*p!
    How I miss my 87 now, memories flooding back! You had to love the thing to stand all its idiosyncracies, like the time I blew a dozen 2 kW water-cooled klystrons and thought it was my fault until eventually the manufacturers owned up that it had been a bad batch. I think those things cost about as much as a missile each!

    in reply to: Twin Ramjet Powered Monoplanes #1302341
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    OK, BigVern, but I assumed the kit would be a Mk 2, the only (operational) Bloodhounds I ever saw!

    in reply to: Twin Ramjet Powered Monoplanes #1302556
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    It’s not complete without a T86 (or preferably) T87 radar! With moving aerials!

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 2,888 total)