dark light

Papa Lima

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 2,888 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Plentiful Percivals #1314051
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Pembroke C Mk 52

    Outside the Swedish Air Force Museum at Linköping, part of a larger photo of the whole line-up, taken in 2004.

    in reply to: Tribute to Marcel Dassault #2588074
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    When he refused to build aircraft for the Nazis, Marcel Bloch was arrested as a Jew and sent to Buchenwald.
    He changed his name to Dassault after the war because it is French for “attack” and was the nom-de-guerre of his brother Paul, a general in the French resistance movement.
    He had a successful business long before the war, which was started up with help from his father-in-law.
    I personally find some of the remarks on this thread distasteful; this is a man who deserves all honour and recognition.

    in reply to: Twin Ramjet Powered Monoplanes #1322055
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    My stint on 112 Sqn didn’t last long – the Bloodhound era for that squadron began at Woodhall Spa, where I helped to erect a brand new T87 radar out of packing cases, with much swearing involved. Almost as soon as we had it up and running, we had to dismantle and repack it again! (That’s the RAF for you!).
    A very small group of us carted it down to Aberporth, thus missing the sunshine of Cyprus, enjoyed by the rest of the Squadron.
    Instead we had to build it again (in the process breaking the ribs of one of our number when the extraordinarily crude gantry crane let go one day and the hand winch rotated faster than a Spitfire propeller). At least we subsequently had the satisfaction of guiding several very expensive missiles into Cardigan Bay. Even though they didn’t have warheads, at least one went straight through the middle of a radio-controlled Meteor – more taxpayer’s money down the drain!
    Just got back from a day trip to Copenhagen for a business meeting (9 hour round trip) so I’m too tired to write more, but I hope this thread flourishes!
    I must mention the Russian spy trawlers one day.

    in reply to: Lincolnshire travels #1323287
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    I am almost certain that there is no public transport passsing the Newark Air Museum either. I usually bike there from Balderton, where my eldest son lives, when I can’t borrow his wife’s car!

    in reply to: Lincolnshire travels #1323476
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Take a bike to the side where the Vulcan is! AFAIK there is no public transport at all on that side! (Mind you, it’s 51 years since I lived on the base!)

    in reply to: Air and Space Museum Udvarhazy…… #1323480
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Are tripods or unipods allowed in there?

    in reply to: Mosquito RR299 #1323553
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Mosquito in EAA Museum

    Is this the Kermit Weeks one? Photographed in the EAA Museum at Oshkosh in 2003.

    in reply to: EDO OSE-1 #1324153
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    For US aircraft, it’s always the first place to check!

    in reply to: Spitfire and Concorde in the final #1324681
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    BASpeedbird001

    Gordo wrote “As someone a little in the know can I post some answers:”

    Hardly “pretend to know it all!” as you claim.

    How is it, with your own contacts with the SCG group, that you cannot refute his information with any facts that your colleagues in that group could supply?

    I am one of the many who are very proud of Concorde but accept that circumstances have led to permanent grounding, which is unfortunate but a fact of life.

    in reply to: Aircraft Carrier Deck Surface #2056599
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    I visited the USS “George Washington” a few years ago in Cannes, and remember that the deck had a particularly rough surface, like coarse non-slip material, plastic or rubber, I seem to remember, although my memory is fading . . .
    It certainly wasn’t bare (or painted) steel, anyway.

    in reply to: EDO OSE-1 #1324835
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    EDO XOSE

    And a couple of pictures from the same source.

    in reply to: EDO OSE-1 #1324840
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Here is the relevant information from Aerofiles:

    XOSE-1 1945 = 1p version; ff: 12/28/45. POP: 8 [75210/75217], of which 2 converted to XOSE-2 [75214/75215] and 2 to XTE-1 [75216/75217].
    XOSE-2 1947 = 2p version with enlarged fin; ff: 7/24/47. POP: 2 conversions of XOSE-1 [75214/75215].

    OSE-2 – Redesignated from XS2E-1. POP: 4 serially assigned [75625/75628], but production was cancelled.

    http://www.aerofiles.com/_e.html

    in reply to: RAF Museum, Cosford – 9th Apr 06 #1325406
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Couldn’t both staff statements be correct?
    Eviction because of lack of BA maintenance support?

    in reply to: aeroplane may 2006 whirlwind database #1325722
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Whirlwind cockpit area detail

    Here is the relevant part of the Mike Badrocke cutaway drawing (in the Aeroplane article, page 67). There seems to be a curve on all the associated formers, but that could be the mistake you are pointing out!

    in reply to: aeroplane may 2006 whirlwind database #1325879
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    It would be nice if you had the time and inclination to write a similar but fully correct article for Flypast magazine . . .
    I for one would greatly appreciate it!
    I have come across so may perpetuated mistakes in compiling my personal database (of first flights) it can be extremely difficult to know what really is the truth. Here in Sweden I do not have access to many great sources that are available in the UK, so my project is very long drawn out (5 years so far and still counting!)

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 2,888 total)