dark light

Papa Lima

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 2,888 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Argosy Website #1216916
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    I too sat in that roomy cockpit, and yes, it is the 2nd prototype.

    in reply to: Argosy Website #1216938
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    As far as I was concerned, the Argosy was just a means of getting to the airfield to be calibrated, and then becoming a target to provide patterns of flying around the airfield while I was in the control tower. It may have had some extra navigational gear for this, but all I needed was my experience and pair of hands (with the odd screwdriver). The most important bit then was to use the Argosy to get home, although due to weather that didn’t always succeed!
    On one flight a wheel was very reluctant to come down, but a few hefty thumps on the runway on the other wheel did the trick, although the crew had warned me to stay on the side with the good wheel, just in case!
    That period was one of my most enjoyable times in the mob! I never knew beforehand where we were going, nor when I would get back!

    in reply to: Lancaster FM213 20th Anniversary This Summer! #1217092
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Let’s hope the new propellers are on it!

    in reply to: Lancaster FM213 To Fly Again This Year! #1217398
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    From The Hamilton Spectator (Apr 4, 2009):

    Hamilton’s famed Lancaster will fly again soon thanks to the outpouring of donations to help repair it.

    The 1945 bomber — one of only two in the world in flying condition — was grounded because of corrosion on its propellers.

    That news, widely published, made it a lot easier to raise $100,000 to replace them.

    Roughly 1,200 individuals so far have sent in donations of anywhere from $5 to $5,000.

    Their generosity has amazed staff at the Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum, the Lancaster’s home beside John C. Munro Hamilton International Airport at Mount Hope.

    The museum has raised $75,000 from public donations, mostly from Hamilton and area but also some from across Canada, said CEO David Rohrer.

    Many contributors are first time donors who also wrote notes about what the Lancaster means to them.

    in reply to: Bloodhound: Cold war walks #1218079
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Nice view of our cricket pitch there at Newton outside the hangar to its left. I spent about a year there being trained on the T87 radar (the BIG one – about 50 tons of it) which I think can be seen immediately to the right of the red rectangle. After that I got married, went to Woodhall Spa (first son born), then to Aberporth (second son born). Hectic!

    in reply to: Lancaster FM213 To Fly Again This Year! #1218386
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Third – see my avatar!

    in reply to: Eustace Short photo. Doctored? #1218572
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Horace (not Eustace) suffered a head injury resulting in meningitis while an infant, followed by abnormal brain development, which made him a genius although malformed. In other words, he did look like that (although I have not seen the photo you mention, I have others showing his large head).

    in reply to: Lancaster FM213 To Fly Again This Year! #1219037
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    An incredible flight and well worth the 600 Canadian dollars it cost for 45 minutes!

    in reply to: Lancaster FM213 To Fly Again This Year! #1219068
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    Peter!
    You seem to have beaten me to it, I thought I had posted this as a new thread!
    My interest is that I flew in this aircraft on 16 August 2004, which was my most memorable flight, even though during 17 years in the RAF I flew in many other aircraft. The “Certificate of Flight” that I received after the flight is proudly hung on the wall in my apartment here in Sweden.

    in reply to: Lancaster FM213 To Fly Again This Year! #1219197
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    CWH Lancaster grounded

    From the on-line Lincolnshire Echo newspaper today:
    A Lancaster bomber based in Canada has been grounded – meaning Lincolnshire now has the only remaining airworthy equivalent.
    Out of 7,377 Lancasters built in the 1940s, the Avro Lancaster at the Battle of Britain Memorial Flight at RAF Coningsby and the one at the Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum are the only bombers able to fly today.
    Now, the Canadian museum has discovered corrosion in the propellers, forcing engineers to ground the plane until the blades can be replaced.
    This means that the PA474 Lancaster in Lincolnshire is now the only model in the world in good enough condition to fly.
    In an appeal for funds the Canadian museum said: “Unfortunately without new propeller blades we will not be able to meet our flying commitments for the 2009 season.
    “In order to honour our commitments, we must endeavour to make our Lancaster airworthy once again.”
    Since the appeal went out, the Canadian museum has been loaned a set of propellers by the Greenwood Military Aviation Museum, in Nova Scotia.
    But engineers there say the blades need to be inspected before they can be sure they are suitable and would only solve the problem short term.
    “Even if we are able to make use of the blades donated by the Greenwood Museum, we feel it necessary to purchase permanent while they are available,” the statement added.
    The cost to buy, ship and overhaul these blades would be around £50,000.

    in reply to: Lense choice ? #448573
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    I haven’t been to Hendon for donkey’s years, but I believe that you have to ask permission to use a tripod there. The other aircraft places you mention are no problem, and at Duxford you might get some flying shots if you are lucky.
    You can see some of my Duxford pictures here:
    http://www.planesandchoppers.com/list.asp?field=contributor_no&crit=93
    Have a good trip!

    in reply to: Lense choice ? #448579
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    In museums I use a tripod whenever possible, only using flash if tripods are not permitted, but the results usually require a lot of photoshopping afterwards as you must have a long depth of field (see the camera manual information about “aperture”). I have an EOS 350D which works just fine for almost every situation, but I’m just an amateur! There are other people on this Forum who are experts, and I guess they will soon post some helpful comments for you.
    Just remember that as long as you have enough memory in the camera, you can experiment with different apertures and times to find what suits the situation best. I discard about 90% of my pictures when they have been taken in tricky lighting situations, but I suppose I am a slow learner!
    One very difficult museum in my opinion is the USAF Museum at Wright-Patterson, Dayton, very dark with only spotlights at ceiling level (a high ceiling too) – but they do permit tripods!

    in reply to: Lense choice ? #448583
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    I would take all three, using the short lens in museums, the middle one for medium distance shots of aircraft, etc. on the ground, and the long one for aircraft that are flying.

    in reply to: Argosy Website #1228858
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    I can confirm the reference on the web site concerning radar calibration with the 115 Sqn Argosies. My job as a radar technician was to fly with them as the one and only passenger and be dropped off at the control tower to check the radar equipment while the pilot flew those accurate patterns around the airfield. The best job I ever had in 17 years in the mob – and I usually got to share the crew’s Dundee cake too!

    in reply to: SHF's A-26 Invader #1233788
    Papa Lima
    Participant

    That is probably the one that has been parked at Säve (Gothenburg City Airport) all winter.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 2,888 total)