I think it is going to need a rather robust flight control system, definitely fly-by-wire.
Are the Iranians up to designing such a thing?
Supersonic also leads to heating, which leads to other
problems, especially having a very detectable IR signature.
Stealth and persistence requirements pretty much result
in a LO, subsonic design. A supersonic, stealthy platform
would be much more expensive.
James Oberg on Russian space and aerospace industry:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/49217472/ns/technology_and_science-space/
Sorry if I irritated anyone…….was just posting a news item.
No sub-textual agenda on my part.
Cheers.
Nice A-50 pic:
From Defense News:
U.K. Reverting to STOVL JSF for its Carriers
http://www.defensenews.com/article/20120416/DEFREG02/304160002
Seems that the cost of converting the carriers was too much.
I believe it is a Piasecki or Sikorsky modded Blackhawk. :confused:
In the Pentagon briefing it was stated that 110 Tomahawks were
launched at “over twenty” targets….that is around 4 or 5 cruise
missiles per target. Hmmmm…..
CNN just said on-air that a tank was destroyed in Benghazi
by French aircraft and that SAM sites are now being targeted.
Let us pray for any civilians now caught in the middle….
According to a ‘breaking news’ header at the MSNBC website
French warplanes have entered Libyan airspace. Not found any
corroborating evidence as of yet….
To be honest Super Hornet would do the job very well for Canada. It can carry every weapon already used by their CF-188 fleet, offer a low cost transition burden for their personel, support for years to come due to the large USN purchase and its more then capable of handling the role.
Totally agree. Add to that perhaps 10-15 EF-18 Growlers and
Canadians would have a very capable force which would serve
them quite well until a more moderately-priced 5th or 6th gen
aircraft was available (2025-2030?).
Some points to consider:
1. The Chinese government is not nearly as publicly accountable to
its population as is the government of the USA, so if it wants hundreds
or even thousands of J-20s it is only matter of government will….and
resources. And if the F-22 is as amazing as it is said to be, then 187
of them are surely threat enough?
2. The economic advantages to the USA economy overall of producing
more F-22s is minimal and it might actually slow (initially) the F-35
production schedule….which is a much larger program with economic
and international consequences for yet another slowdown.
3. China has other military concerns besides just the USA.
4. There seems to be little political will to invest more money in the
F-22 by the USA government, especially in their present economic
environment. With rumors of a possible F-35B cancellation due to
money concerns and cost overruns, do you really think funding for
more F-22s is even remotely possible?
5. Even if the House of Representatives could come to an agreement
on producing more F-22s, would not the Democrat-led Senate and
presidential line-item veto prevent it from actually happening?
6. How many F-22s would need to be produced so that Lockheed
would have an actual economic incentive to do so?
Cheers.
“War-Toy Wishes” (Newsweek)
“As Lockheed Martin’s Marietta, Ga., plant prepares to begin building the 187th—and last—F-22 super-fighter, the military is already dreaming of its successor. In a query to the aerospace industry earlier this month, the Air Force laid out its wish list, and it wants everything: a plane that can win dogfights, demolish air-defense missile networks, support ground troops, and run surveillance missions; a partial prototype would be ready by 2020, with entry into service by 2030.”
Full article here:
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/11/13/the-air-force-s-war-toy-wish.html
Eurocopter X3 hybrid helicopter
“MARSEILLE, France (Reuters) – European group Eurocopter showed off a revolutionary winged helicopter on Monday, in a bid to counter U.S. rival Sikorsky’s efforts to break the speed barrier by rewriting rotorcraft design rules.
The X3 hybrid helicraft — which combines forward-facing propellers astride two short aircraft wings with the familiar overhead rotor blades seen on any normal helicopter — was unveiled following months of secrecy.”
The U. S. Air Force and ANG fly the A-10, not
the USMC.
The USAF has been trying to get rid of the A-10 for many years
……much to the chagrin of the guys on the ground in the Army.
Or so I am told……. 😉