dark light

Harm-Jan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 45 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Butcher Bird coming to DX #1264578
    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    Any chance of you flying it and thus not see it fly?

    in reply to: Yakkes Foundation open day 25 november 2006 #1326599
    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    Hi Mennie,

    Not with a Yak I’m afraid but with the simple but reliable Charly150 Heavy PH-KDF. If possible I prefer flying over driving because for this aviation junky there is only one thing ( allright, maybe two) that beats talking about aircraft and that’s flying aircraft.

    in reply to: Yakkes Foundation open day 25 november 2006 #1328256
    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    Is it possible to fly into Eindhoven on that day?

    in reply to: Iraqi Fury trainer pics link #1328526
    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    It took us quitte some time here in the western world to appreciate the value of older aircraft and start collecting, restoring and displaying them. In the meantime a lot of valuable material was lost forever so that we now go under the ice, into the seas and into the swamps to collect the remains of aircraft that were once all too common. If an airframe in Iraq is currently under threat (which they are in my opinion) I would prefer it to be brought out and stored, restored or displayed so that it is preserved for future generations. If Iraq develops in such a way that one day they can foster an interest in historic aircraft the aircraft could always be returned.

    in reply to: Iraqi Fury trainer pics link #1329520
    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    Bring it Harm’s way! Seriously, I don’t think those Iraqi’s are really interested in these relics (they have more important things on their minds I guess) so bring the airplane out and find a good home for it. Better get it out and in relative safety than let it stay with the risk that someday there will be nothing left of it.

    in reply to: Iraqi Fury trainer pics link #1329684
    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    Why leave it out of Harm’s way. What am I doing wrong.

    Harm

    in reply to: TV series "A plane is born" #1260348
    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    A friend of mine was building a Europa as well at the time the series was first aired on television. He was quite critical of the programme and was adament that the aircraft was not built by mr. Evans but was effectivively built by either the manufacturer or other professionals.

    in reply to: Fatal Hellcat crash in Tennessee (revisited) #1335807
    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    Hi Lynn,

    I agree that what this pilot did at first sight looks stupid. On the other hand I am convinced that most, if not all, pilots if asked whether they have ever done something stupid while flying or have seriously misjudged a situation will admit that they have (At least when they are honest). The only difference between the one’s that get killed and the one’s that survive is that the latter were lucky and got another chance to learn and become better pilots. And beware of pilots that tell you that they have never done things that were stupid, those that deny are the most dangerous of them all.

    Mr. Vance made a mistake and paid the ultimate price. Let’s not convict him for that but let’s try to learn something from his mistake and try to become a better and safer pilot.

    Harm-Jan

    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    Cees,

    Question: how “original” do you think MJ271 is? Remember this particular aircraft did not go on display inside the Aviodrome (or Aviodome for that part) directly after it’s last flight in service with the air force. It first went to a small museum in Delfzijl, apparently losing such parts as the rudder, elevator, tailwheel, canopy and prop. As the aircraft was displayed outside and close to the sea corrosion took it’s toll. It would appear that the aircraft got a fair share of fresh metal during it’s subsequent restoration and a load of “new” parts to replace missing parts.

    I agree that this machine is a nice example of a Spitfire but in my opinion not in the same class as for instance the P-38 at NASM or the Corsair in Yeovilton.

    Again, I’m sorry to see it leave (for the time being at last) but look forward to seeing a Firefly emerge from restoration and seeing the proceeds being used to restore other aircraft in the Aviodrome collection.

    Harm-Jan

    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    Is MH434 no longer active?

    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    Hi Cees,

    I find it difficult to judge the actions of the Aviodrome as I do not have all the details (who sold what, for what price/conditions) op the transactions that sees it lose a nice Spit and gain a rather neglected Firefly.

    When I last visited the Aviodrome a couple of months ago I was rather disappointed by the quality and variety of the aircraft on display and the fact that the museum seemed to be lacking focus. When I visited the museum had 3 F-27’s on display (1 actually a F-27-050 but the difference is too small for most visitors to notice), 3 DC-3’s, 2 DC-2’s, 5 S-11’s and 2 Kolibrie helicopters. Even to me as an enthousiast all this duplication seemed a waste of resources that does nothing to attract the general public.

    Apart from this duplication there were a large number of aircraft on display or in storage that could use some TLC such as the Grumman Tracker, Fokker C-V, B-747, DC-4, Neptune etc, work that could really enhance the overall appearance of the museum. Selling a Spitfire for a decent number of Euro’s and investing this money in the restoration of some of the other aircraft or the construction of additional hangars seems a good deal to me. It’s a pity we are losing a Spit, but we could gain a lot more. And to be honest, I think a Firefly is an aircraft that has historical relevance to our country, is missing is our collections and as such is a valuable addition.

    All in all I think the Aviodrome might have made a smart move, let’s just wait and see what happens and see how they invest the money they just made.

    Harm-Jan

    in reply to: Duxford Firefly on the move ? #1257877
    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    And 1 in the museum in Overloon IIRC

    in reply to: Crashed RAF-bomber Ockenburg #1295609
    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    I have 1 Hampden lost to Flak on august 8 1940 that crashed at a place called Oosthuizen. I have no idea where to find Oosthuizen, could this be near The Hague? All other Hampden losses in Holland in august and september that I know of occured at places that are known and none was at Ockenburg.

    The Hampden lost on august 8 was P2077 form 44 sq. Waddington. The crew of 4 survived and were taken prisoner.

    Harm-Jan Strating

    in reply to: P-51D-20-NA G-CEBW #1299299
    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    Hi Shuck,

    In that case this is an airframe that, as far as I know, has never been listed as a “survivor”. Does anybody know what this restoration or rebuild started with?

    Harm-Jan

    PS: No, I don’s mind if it started with just a data-plate, as long as looks, sounds and flies like a P-51 it’s a P-51 to me and I like them a lot!

    in reply to: P-51D-20-NA G-CEBW #1300731
    Harm-Jan
    Participant

    Could this be a typo? My information on surviving Mustangs does list a c/n 122-38604, a P-51-D-20NA, USAAF s/n 44-72145, airworthy, registered N51PT and owned/operated by Castlewood Air Motive Inc.

    Harm-Jan Strating

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 45 total)