Hi All,
Paul,
Don’t know about bacon but I ad a sausage sandwich earlier! :highly_amused: Just glad Sue still feeds me to be honest! 😀
Snafu,
I found this on wiki and the last paragraph seems to fit your honourable questioning ?
P A K I acquired offensive connotations in the 1960s when used by British tabloids to refer to subjects of former colony states in a derogatory and racist manner. In modern British usage P A K I is typically a derogatory label used for all South Asians, including Indians, Afghans and Bangladeshis. To a lesser extent, it has also been applied to Arabs and others perceived to resemble South Asians. During the 60’s many emigrants were also dubbed as “black” to further segregate them from the white community. Some would say such a division still exists in parts of England.
In recent times there has been a trend by second and third-generation British Pakistanis to reclaim the word, so that it can be used between young British Pakistanis, but not by outsiders, even Indians and Bangladeshis.
As for the others you mentioned they are all slang for the various peoples from counties over the world. Just to throw the cat amongst the pigeons here 😀 Although the term WOG has the same connotations as P A K I it is actually a shortened version of Westernised Oriental Gentleman.
Geoff.
Hi All,
I am sorry Moggy but I have to agree with Charlie. One question though if you knew you had been speeding why the need for a brief why not be honest and plead guilty to the charge ?
Geoff.
Charlie,
Please could you PM your e-mail address being as you do not accept PM’s from other members.:eagerness:
Paul,
No I never I’ll have to ask the wife to watch for that. Maybe that’s why the wife gives me my tea with the same hand. :highly_amused:
Geoff.
Hi All,
Moogy,
I am sorry but I do not understand why you would still need a brief to plead guilty and accept the punishment ? I assume it’s not a legal requirement to have a brief when pleading guilt is it ? Please advise not being legally minded in the process of the law courts it would come in handy for future reference if needed :eagerness:
Geoff
Hi All,
Your trying to tell me now that there is a different language as far as legal terms go ?
Question:- How do you plead ?
Answer :- Guilty
What is there to translate into Legal Terms/Speak/Language/Talk ????
The only other words that would be added is the sentence unless you make the case for any mitigating circumstances.
Geoff.
Hi All,
Mr Batfastard that’s a new one on me, a disguised compliment if ever there was one :highly_amused: just call me Geoff/Fatty/Doughboy anything you like 😀
Why not do a multi kit that you can make say three or four different aircraft from the same kit ?
Geoff.
Hi All,
What a load of tripe! You do not need a barrister to admit guilt end of and if you plead mitigating circumstances other than somebody who is bleeding out through injury, rushing a sick relative or your wife who is having a baby to hospital (Even then those excuses may not help) there are none simple as. You speed, get caught, get done ! Join the real world.
Geoff.
Finding the money hurt. It was equivalent to my after tax earnings for a month. But without my licence it is likely that my earnings, and those of nearly thirty other people would have been reduced or ended. So the overdraft just became greater. I didn’t have the resources , but Natwest did.
Moggy.
Hi All,
You should have thought about your licence and the thirty other people who obviously rely on you before you stuck your toe down simple! If as you say their earnings were dependant on you, then you are guilty of being reckless with complete disregard for those other peoples lives even more so and not just your own because of your own actions.
Geoff.
Hi All,
Elysium extended cut. Very good especially the extra edition of how they made the film at the end.:eagerness:
Geoff.
Hi All,
Isn’t the problem more along the lines that as the world moves on while taking note of the problems and slowly trying to fix them no matter what the subject matter is they are running out of things to aid there cause and are choosing softer targets to try and get their points across, IMHO all these protest groups move from one cause to the next when they either succeed or hit a brick wall with their current protest.
Ask yourself this if all their causes where met in full what would they do ? They are just like armed rebels when the fighting is over what do they do now they have no fight but still have the arms ?
Geoff.
Hi All,
hampden98,
Yes take it up again, there are plenty of Rivers,Canals and pools that cater for all anglers you don’t need to go with the latest gear just the basics as you used to, angling has changed but most of the changes you mentioned where simply to try and be more fish friendly so to speak(If you can other than whacking a great hook in the side of their mouth) It’s still enjoyable to thousands why not try and join a local club you never know may meet like minded folk such as yourself.
Geoff.
Hi All,
It’s not his actions but the defending of his actions that get under my skin, watch the video in the DONT LET THIS HAPPEN TO YOU thread on this section of the forum that could easily have happened to moggy while he was speeding or anybody else for that matter no matter who speeds you cannot defend against it unless an emergency was occurring.
So because nobody was around it was o.k. then ? Well in that case how extreme can you take the law ? Well there was nobody around so I shot the ******** ?? Why are you getting personal Moggy ? You are the one who stated your history about getting off a speeding ban by having a barrister and IMHO would say you are only trying to persuade yourself that what you did was a good thing, you got court speeding nothing more nothing less.
Your use of a barrister was a means of effectively of using your workforce as mitigating circumstances for your own actions, I do wonder though had the tables been turned and it was one of your workforce that had been in the same position would you have the same frame of mind.
I agree my opinion counts for nothing, there is no need to start being personal because I counter your argument for a positive spin on what should have
been an straight forward guilty plea without need for a barrister and that is what this thread was concerned about people affording barristers just to evade a harsher punishment.
Geoff.
Hi All,
Always loved Joan Rivers since I first came across her in the eighties, ditto what Charlie has said plus she was a woman not afraid to speak her mind on many taboo subjects add to that she was hilariously funny at the same time. Another shining star has gone out that will leave the world a slightly less bearable place to exist. 🙁
Geoff.-
Hi All,
I agree a very sad happening but this is what can happen when speeding in a car or as in this case a bike, the bike rider 97m.ph.?? In what universe is it safe to be doing that sort of speed when there is other traffic around and on an A Rd, I am sorry but even as a bike rider myself my sympathy goes out to the car driver as he would just not have the reaction time considering the bike speed to avert an accident.
I have looked at the beginning of the video a few times the bike rider has broken the law on three separate instances before the accident, 1st – Speeding 97m.p.h.,2nd – He crossed into the herringbones while illegally overtaking,3rd – Overtaking illegally approaching a junction.
Geoff.
Hi All,
If only they were as tough on the so called professionals! Spot on IMHO and FIFA could learn a thing or two from this punishment.
Geoff.