dark light

1batfastard

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,461 through 2,475 (of 4,006 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Low Level…… #2212261
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    View from inside an F-111 at low altitude. :eagerness:
    http://lh3.ggpht.com/_kIWY2DV0KnE/TPFySd2wXvI/AAAAAAAAIDc/mpFf2npPK_4/F-111%20-%20View%20from%20the%20cockpit%20at%20low%20level.jpg

    Geoff.

    in reply to: General Discussion #273475
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    PP,
    Here you are matey I thought one had been damaged, Full Story in link. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paddington-bear-charity-statue-beheaded-4856644
    http://www.independent.co.uk/incoming/article9940513.ece/alternates/w620/paddington%20bear%20decapitated%20head%202.jpg

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Shaun in the City #1831968
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    PP,
    Here you are matey I thought one had been damaged, Full Story in link. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paddington-bear-charity-statue-beheaded-4856644
    http://www.independent.co.uk/incoming/article9940513.ece/alternates/w620/paddington%20bear%20decapitated%20head%202.jpg

    Geoff.

    in reply to: General Discussion #273480
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Bob,
    Didn’t you here they did it was behind the B-17…:D

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Top Gear (Moggy will be pleased!) #1831969
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Bob,
    Didn’t you here they did it was behind the B-17…:D

    Geoff.

    in reply to: General Discussion #273485
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    CD you say the F-22 is to expensive and the F-35 is not ? I mean they are talking about 6th gen aircraft when they haven’t got the 5th sorted out so why would you throw money down the drain ? somebody should have put a stop to this flying money pit years ago instead they keep throwing money at it with crossed fingers behind there backs you cant throw money at a problem and say that will put it right. There have been and was a number of designs that could have carried on from where the Harrier left off, personally the Boeing X-32 concept design was my favourite of the two competing airframes and at leas they admitted in the beginning when they had trouble with the chin mounted air scoop, for the money that has been thrown at the F-35 Boeing could have sorted that problem out in no time also if I am not mistaken didn’t the Boeing utilise many off the shelf parts while at the same time adding new designed features (Please correct if wrong.)
    I just think that stealth was the in word when designing these aircraft but it wouldn’t be very stealthy with all that hardware hung on the pylons in another post showing all the weapons it was capable of carrying.
    You are of coarse correct in saying the current crop of 4th gen aircraft are on the finishing straight but rather than trying to do the Long jump shouldn’t they be doing the Hop/Skip and jump ? IMHO they were simply trying to cram all the latest all singing dancing whistle and bells kit into an airframe that looked good on paper, but in reality cost to much to bring off the drawing board without incurring the technical delays never mind the increased price that have cost not just the USA but all other nations who were promised this ballerina of the sky, not to mention that already allegedly there are systems now capable of seeing the aircraft and like I mentioned in another post I believe that the aircraft was defeated in combat exercises by 4th gen aircraft (Please correct if wrong.)

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Oh dear! #1831970
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    CD you say the F-22 is to expensive and the F-35 is not ? I mean they are talking about 6th gen aircraft when they haven’t got the 5th sorted out so why would you throw money down the drain ? somebody should have put a stop to this flying money pit years ago instead they keep throwing money at it with crossed fingers behind there backs you cant throw money at a problem and say that will put it right. There have been and was a number of designs that could have carried on from where the Harrier left off, personally the Boeing X-32 concept design was my favourite of the two competing airframes and at leas they admitted in the beginning when they had trouble with the chin mounted air scoop, for the money that has been thrown at the F-35 Boeing could have sorted that problem out in no time also if I am not mistaken didn’t the Boeing utilise many off the shelf parts while at the same time adding new designed features (Please correct if wrong.)
    I just think that stealth was the in word when designing these aircraft but it wouldn’t be very stealthy with all that hardware hung on the pylons in another post showing all the weapons it was capable of carrying.
    You are of coarse correct in saying the current crop of 4th gen aircraft are on the finishing straight but rather than trying to do the Long jump shouldn’t they be doing the Hop/Skip and jump ? IMHO they were simply trying to cram all the latest all singing dancing whistle and bells kit into an airframe that looked good on paper, but in reality cost to much to bring off the drawing board without incurring the technical delays never mind the increased price that have cost not just the USA but all other nations who were promised this ballerina of the sky, not to mention that already allegedly there are systems now capable of seeing the aircraft and like I mentioned in another post I believe that the aircraft was defeated in combat exercises by 4th gen aircraft (Please correct if wrong.)

    Geoff.

    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Still amazes me that the makers still make mistakes and not informing the presenter he has made one,like Alan said nice to see inside the chapel but this is were the mistake happened of all places, The stain glass windows portray all the RAF staff in various jobs but when the presenter came to a ground crew window he stated the aircraft they were working on was a Spitfire which it was not (Hurricane) this really bug’s me because the presenter keeps banging on about how much it means to him personally walking around these airfields that and being an aviation buff since knee high to a grass hopper etc.etc. it just belittles the programme and the sacrifices that so many made during the poignant part of the programme IMHO.
    I have said before about the continuity and basic errors that should really be picked up on the day of filming which leads me to believe that the presenters and makers just treat these programmes with no passion for getting what they are saying across and correctly. I don’t know about other forumites but these programmes are catering for a specific audience while hoping to attract the casual viewer, also the least they could do is get what they are talking about right and the continuity is my biggest bug bear especially in films and Dramas, again in programme two about Duxford he was walking in the American Air Museum telling the viewer how this was the 1st airfield he visited and he would never have guessed he would back many years later presenting a programme about airfields, as he was walking under the hung aircraft he correctly points to a couple of aircraft then states he’s walking under the wing of a Marauder when it’s a Mitchel ??
    I am sorry and yes it’s only my opinion and that does not matter really but consider this, these programmes should emulate the Aircraft/Pilots/Staff etc.etc. when making these documentaries those who make the programmes should care about their chosen subject getting the correct Facts/Film footage/Continuity etc.etc. to honour those who flew and fought, repaired these aircraft let alone the multitude of people who are behind the scenes on active airfields in particular that’s all I ask or am I asking the impossible :confused:

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #863117
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Many thanks again to all you snappers with the excellent photos keep up the good work your keeping this armchair fan well and truly up to speed. :eagerness:
    DCW,
    Your picture of the very lonely looking Beaufighter (Post 569) any news on what is happening ? or is it destined to be a hanger queen because of the lack of suitable engines for her ? I would imagine the now the Blenheim is finished ARC could complete the aircraft if it’s time money and engines they could even dare I say it trade in one of the Firefly’s that are taking root unless these are next for the ARC treatment 😉

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Doug Gregory DFC 1923-2015 #863120
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    I contacted the hospital just now and other than to say he is in a stable condition they offer no other info, I myself will send him a get well card anybody else wanting to do this also here is the address below. :eagerness:
    Mr Ivan(Doug) Gregory
    C/O Neuro intensive Care Ward,
    Southampton General Hospital
    Tremona Road,
    Southampton,
    Hampshire,
    SO16 6YD.
    023-8077-7222.

    Geoff.

    in reply to: General Discussion #273776
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    All this talking the Muppets are all dong is just vote catching promises,pomises,promises, When all the time they are all quite aware they can not keep them, looks like the Referendum has gone off the boil hen ?

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Just a simple question. #1832012
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    All this talking the Muppets are all dong is just vote catching promises,pomises,promises, When all the time they are all quite aware they can not keep them, looks like the Referendum has gone off the boil hen ?

    Geoff.

    in reply to: General Discussion #273780
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi Alll,
    unsurpassed global air superiority….. :highly_amused:
    The gif below pretty much sus up the whole affair concerning the F-35.
    http://coub.com/view/1nn7qy68

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Oh dear! #1832013
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi Alll,
    unsurpassed global air superiority….. :highly_amused:
    The gif below pretty much sus up the whole affair concerning the F-35.
    http://coub.com/view/1nn7qy68

    Geoff.

    in reply to: General Discussion #273785
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Jim/91 Regal/CD/Paul178/TonyT/Charlie
    Aliens who knows ? :cool:(Begin playing Outer Limits theme music in your head now!)/And ON and On And On :sleeping: Can man ?:eek:Well if we are to believe the Bible God made Adam in his own image then made eve out of one of Adams ribs :confused:Must have used Cosmo Small pieces Glasses then:highly_amused: Exactly:eagerness: Pick a colour but being as they were looking a sort of you know cross between Jews and Arab middle eastern off white tanish:p
    All in all it doesn’t really matter if you believe you believe, myself like GHOSTS I am open minded to most things but love all the biblical stuff that’s been on Tv lately in the way of Discovery and NG channels and I see the Bible as a sort of ancient Diary written and told in many versions from that period in time.
    I have a favourite poem called Footprints In The Sand written by Mary Stephenson, I am not really religious just open minded to the possibility of their being something else it has helped on a couple occasions when I have needed my mind to get focused and would be nice to think I have a guardian angel of sorts, but like your thinking where’s the proof of them ? just them buried spitfires in Burma 😀 read it for your self and make your own mind up.
    https://blacksheepsweetdreams.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/footprints-in-the-sand.jpg

    Geoff.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,461 through 2,475 (of 4,006 total)