dark light

1batfastard

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,076 through 3,090 (of 4,006 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2237629
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Like this one Kamov 52.

    http://rchelisupplier.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/kamov52_13.jpg

    Geoff.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2237639
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Love this one stuff of nightmares 😀

    http://rostec.ru/content/images/other/helicopters/148491.jpg

    Geoff.

    in reply to: B52 crash and broken arrow at Thule AFB #2237707
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    vagn,
    Have you tried the direct approach with the US Air Force always worth a try in my book you never know what may turn up. :eagerness:

    Geoff.

    in reply to: The Last Film You Watched….. IV #1847724
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Captain Philips – Pleasantly surprised by this film. :applause:

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Energy Bills #1847727
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    You just wait till they start blaming the Ukraine conflict for the increase it’s only a matter of time. 🙁

    Geoff.

    in reply to: The' Thing'…N3M…WTF #923918
    1batfastard
    Participant
    in reply to: 2014 – RNHF Sea Fury incident at Culdrose #924048
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    If it was the Engine that threw a major hissy fit and being they out sourced the engine rebuild couldn’t they claim against the Engine rebuilders ? either way such a promising start to the season has put the kibosh on the RNHF teams season I loved the spread that Aeroplane gave them after the restoration and then this. :apologetic:

    Geoff.

    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Sorry about the misspelling of STIRLING but if you look in my second post I spelt it correctly:D, My point is if anybody when doing these documentary’s ever bothered just to ask if the clips and story’s are correct before airing they would be well received by all, it takes the **** out of the audience to treat them as one poster put it – ‘Alright for the general public’ that is no excuse if you are doing a documentary at least get the facts correct especially when involving personal tragedy’s. The bomber aircrew who had their lives taken had already been disrespected by having no official memorial also mentioned in my second post and IMO this latest documentary was just another insult and yes the BBC is not the only guilty party when doing this in fact the vast majority excel in having the wrong material portraying whatever.
    Another point I was trying to make if they where as careful as they are when making other historical documentary’s and dramas then I would have more respect than I have, at the end of the day they are putting money before the true facts,continuity,etc.etc. as well as those who had their lives taken, as an example why so little mention of the Manchester ? without that the Lancaster would never have been created. I apologise to all who disagree with my opinion but remember that’s all it is they are like noses everybody has one and everybody’s is different. :eagerness:

    Geoff.

    in reply to: 2014 – RNHF Sea Fury incident at Culdrose #924067
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    What a shame after all the hard work that went into getting the Fury back in the air, just glad that no one was injured and the Pilots o.k. hopefully they will strive again to get her back in the air though for ASAP.
    Anyway found this story from the Western Morning News. – http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Crash-landing-brings-Royal-Navy-air-day-halt/story-22046347-detail/story.html

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2238288
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Jf-17 Bloc II anyone ?

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-bhjkiZMR-AA/Tdh8_tGTeEI/AAAAAAAACIc/3a9Nghp1ZGE/s1600/JF-17_thunder_Fighter_jet.jpg

    Geoff.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2238290
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    I know it’s not real but interesting funny Idea. 😀

    http://61.63.55.133/33930/product_8327995_o_2.jpg

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Nose Art 1970's – Present??? #2238293
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Here’s one for you yanks. :applause:

    http://www.aviationspectator.com/files/images/KC-135-Stratotanker-28.jpg

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Female Aviators #2238296
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Don’t think anybody has put this up yet :eagerness:

    Geoff.

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #925115
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    You don’t say 😀 anyway here’s a real one this time can you tell what it is yet ? :highly_amused:
    And back to two in the ultimate trainer.

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/SR71_closeup.jpg/800px-SR71_closeup.jpg

    Geoff.

    1batfastard
    Participant

    Short Sterling????

    Apart from a rowing boat, I’m not sure what else BBC could have laid on for a trip in an inland lake in Northern Germany.

    Hi All,
    Yes definite film of a Stirling touching down with it’s double tail wheel also possibly the aircraft silhouetted above a burning city (Usually used in bomber documentary’s). They could have tried for a larger boat for all three to actually fit in comfortably.

    [QUOTEWhilst I agree that it was a very poor programme, the BBC can and often do make excellent aviation documentaries, the recent one on Eric Brown being a good case in point. A lot depends on who is sub-contracted to produce the programme, I think it’s rare nowadays that the Beeb makes any of its own documentaries.][/QUOTE]
    John, Maybe they should get back to making them all themselves and not farm them out so what is the excuse for allowing bad documentary’s surely they must be scrutinised before being accepted for broadcast in which case it’s back to the BBC and the blame is on them. You could argue that with the Bombing campaign being a very touchy subject that not to much thought to accuracy is given and is just given a curt mention. As proof of this I offer the recent unveiling of the Bomber Command Memorial, who may I add was paid for mostly by public donations unlike other government backed WWII monuments that this country’s governments over the years have been proud to associate themselves with unlike Bomber Command. Like one of the aircrew said they carried out Churchill’s orders and he turned hid back on them need I say more ?
    Twinotter23,
    I in no way consider myself to be an expert, just an enthusiast who knows a little but mainly just somebody who get’s fed up with the continual output of so called documentary’s that have a lack of historical accuracy and visual accuracy when portraying certain aviation subjects. I alighted to this may be cost based, while these documentary’s may bring to attention to a wider audience they should still be correct all the way through it’s treating the audience as thicko’s and insults the memories of those who have had relatives serve in WWII and indeed any survivors from the conflicts represented.

    Geoff.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,076 through 3,090 (of 4,006 total)