dark light

1batfastard

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,961 through 3,975 (of 4,006 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #940014
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    8674planes Just read about Stephen Grey what I say is Well done that man and a big pat on the back without these visionaries where would the enthusiast be ? looking at dead aircraft in museums instead of seeing them where they belong in the air :sleeping: Mr Grey I thank you and long may you continue to spread your infectious enthusiasm about aviation to others who are thinking about starting what you have already done. :applause:

    Tin Triangle,
    Have just sent PM to long and goes off thread a bit but you will like :eagerness:

    As usual lovely photographs all.:)

    Geoff.

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #940043
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hers one that thinks it’s a bomber but can’t make it’s mind up about shoes Tracks or Wheels ? :dev2:

    http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6104/6324385804_a6efddb8a0_z.jpg

    Geoff. 😀

    in reply to: Short Stirling wreck. #940615
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Wouldn’t the Stirling project benefit from any of that im thinking undercarriage wise in particular :confused:

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #940623
    1batfastard
    Participant

    I think the problems with the Beaufighter are technical: specifically TFC have found it impossible to find or restore suitable Hercules engines for the aircraft. There are lots of late Hercules engines around, but I sure I remember reading that the coolant and exhaust plumbing is so totally different that they cannot be plumbed into the Beaufighter. There may also have been some issues with finding serviceable tyres or wheels?
    Add that to the mountain of work they have had to undertake to get all the other aircraft re-certified and airworthy, and it’s easy to see why the Beaufighter (and Sea Fury FB.11) have sat idle for so many years.

    It’s a bit of a shame really, I personally would rather TFC accept that the Beau is a bit of a lost cause as far as flight goes, and instead see the airframe statically restored to a high standard, and added to the IWM collection. It’s a pretty iconic type that TFC are missing, and the aircraft would be a superb addition to the Coastal/Naval displays, for example.
    Same with the Sea Fury, which is a pretty important piece of Korean War heritage absent from the IWM collection. Now TFC have a living, breathing Sea Fury T.20, it’d be great to see the FB.11 in one piece with the IWM. The space cleared in Hangar 2 would be considerable, and allow the collection to perhaps take on a few more different projects…

    There was also the story that new pilot regs mean that Mr.Grey wouldn’t be able to fly the Beaufighter. Considering he funds the operation I guess that was a bit of a show-stopper.

    Tin Triangle and ozplane,
    As far as engines go would they be the same type as fitted Halifax’s and if so the second Halifax restoration has acquired four working engines for the project as I was informed they intend to have it ground running like their Lancaster so I would imagine that although they are hard to come by not impossible.
    As for the wheels and tyres (Wheels)could they not do as other projects have in the past if none available copy those missing parts off museum aircraft ? (Tyres) do they not replicate for all warbirds already or is it a question of a specific compound surely they would be the same as the Beaufort that’s being restored to airworthiness in Australia and will he not encounter all the problems you mentioned that TFC are in limbo with ?
    The same could be said for the plumbing as Hendon’s Beaufighter could surely give them the info needed to carry out work of replicating the missing items,correct me if I am wrong but haven’t other aircraft components been measured etc.etc. to exact measurements with very fine tolerances ?
    I know having said all this it will be expensive to say the least but look at how much was spent on just raising the Dornier,that plus all the work they have put into making it airworthy seems a waste of time to suddenly say we changing our minds about the type of restoration.
    The problem with piloting the aircraft would the Blenheim pilot be able to jump in the hot seat so to speak or come to think of any twin engine rated pilot of similar size and powered aircraft ? or would that be an entirely different set of circumstances ?

    Geoff.

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #940652
    1batfastard
    Participant

    I know but funny :highly_amused::highly_amused::highly_amused:

    [Hello dad where you been 😮 http://www.abpic.co.uk/images/images/1030927M.jpg

    Geoff. 😀

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #940748
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Ozplane and Bob,
    Many thanks for the reply’s and the picture such a shame that it has stalled before getting off the ground so to speak, I was thinking what if Arco ditched the other projects and took this on this would be a real attraction the option is to be partners with TFC ? What’s happened to the work then no more funding or has the intended buyer pulled out ?
    If their not careful they’ll need to start another restoration on the restoration if the progress has halted :highly_amused::highly_amused::highly_amused:

    Again many thanks for the update both 😀

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Bandits at 12 O'clock #940776
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Sage the Owl,
    See I told you I make mistakes :stupid: I should have indicated that it was the cover I was referring to but you are quite right about them yank aircraft,as for the Hampden look at the tail, different tail section ,single rudder as opposed to twin 🙂 but you are correct similar profile from head on.

    Geoff.

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go? (2013) #940783
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Those crazy jet-jockeys are going to miss the Middle East postings, when we withdraw!!

    Hi All,
    Just be glad they missed the ground :highly_amused::highly_amused::highly_amused: they will be taking home some good memmorys back home when they do, not desert related but here’s one this pilot is trying to forget :stupid:

    http://www.strategypage.com/gallery/images/lowflying1.jpg
    Intersesting way to customise a VW van :highly_amused::highly_amused::highly_amused: No o.k. then what about this http://wallpaperaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/WIdow-Maker-1080i-1080P-F-104-Head-On-Jet-Low-Pass.jpg

    Geoff. 😀

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Bandits at 12 O'clock #940789
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Is this the one ? it’s a Hampden rather than a Beaufort and you can read the complete story on line here.

    http://pocketwarcomics.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/air-ace-picture-library-505-knockout.html

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]218428[/ATTACH]

    Hi there,
    Yes Scramble Bill your right about the Beauforts no Hampdens in that story 🙂 Sorry sage the Owl a little error I feel :p not to worry though we all make them me most of all just ask the wife :highly_amused::highly_amused::highly_amused:

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #940796
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Its a form of anti-corrosion treatment.

    Many thanks Mark V, still no takers on the Beaufighter pictures :confused::rolleyes:

    Geoff.

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go? (2013) #940922
    1batfastard
    Participant

    I think “unimpressed” might be an understatement!!:( And this is hardly “How Low Can You Go?” is it?

    I think it fully qualifies, given the height the Bisley was flying when this shot was taken! 😮

    In fact you can fairly accurately calculate that from this image… it’s under 25 ft (about 7.5 m), and subtract a good few feet from that for the prop arc for actual

    ground clearance!

    Hi All,
    Calm Down Calm Down :stupid: How about these beauties then 1st lot probably seen before but still worth the watch.

    AND

    Enjoy mmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!! 😀

    Geoff

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #941538
    1batfastard
    Participant

    What like these :dev2:

    http://cl.jroo.me/z1/q/w/x/e/a.daa-small-Parachute-fail.jpg

    http://i1.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article847255.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/Pensioner+left+hanging+by+a+thread+after+a+skydive+went+wrong

    Or

    These http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xlJ8YMngmRE/TtiI8MCnW5I/AAAAAAAAFsU/FqPZC8oVhVc/s400/naked+parachuting+1.jpg

    Geoff :highly_amused::highly_amused::highly_amused:

    in reply to: Australian Buried Spitfire Claims – Outcome? #941546
    1batfastard
    Participant

    It is highly credible that scrap was bulldozed into a pit. There are plenty of wartime dumps on USAAF fields around East Anglia that have yielded scrapped material.

    A very long way from crated zero-houred Allison engines, inhibited and crated P-51s and B-17s wrapped in hessian, though, or that such items were secretly and deliberately concealed.

    Andy they gave me the impression it wasn’t just scrap but other bits and pieces too that the yanks couldn’t be bothered with, but like you said that could the prime material on the other hand it may not ?

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #941650
    1batfastard
    Participant

    MarkV,
    Is that a form of weather proofing as suggested then ?

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Bristol Bulldog pub sign #941652
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi Will,
    Well done on the pictures like the moody Hurricanes best :applause:

    Geoff.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,961 through 3,975 (of 4,006 total)