Airbags would keep it afloat though!
This thread has been hyjacked again, what a bunchof t#ts 🙂
http://www.defencemanagement.com/news_story.asp?id=15903
Ark Royal for sale
Norwegian ice patrol ship MV Polarbjorn will be leased for three years.
Just going back to the power question, is there enough power to generated to move the ship, for hotel functions and to fling aircraft of the front.
Total power production for the chosen set up is 112mw, maximum power consumption by the 4 electric motors is 80mw leaving 32mw minimum for hotel and EMALS.
EMALS delivers a peak out put of @60mw but of course is charged over a period of time, any one know what the charge rate is?
Hi Liger
The core crew number running the ship according to desider magazine is 760! As regards engines I belive it was 4 trents or 3trents-2 diesels or the set up as is now 2 trents and 4 large diesels, there’s no spare space for large engines in the hull and the diesels are already in the after hull section. I beleive this set up was considered to be more flexable!!
Prince of Wales will get the Cats, almost certainly.
Queenie apparently will be built with the Sky Jump even though the jump jet has been dropped and now she’ll be a replacement for HMS Ocean more than a carrier.
This coming from the following article, at least: http://www.meretmarine.com/article.cfm?id=115509
I’m hoping that we can at least avoid building and installing a Sky Jump that would effectively only waste the space for one helicopter landing spot, and that would be undoubtedly dismantled during the first refit.
Unless there are contracts obligations so powerful that even the sky jump can’t be removed…!I’m saying Prince of Wales gets the traps because this would allow for expenditure on buying and fitting the cats and traps in 2014/15 or even 2016: back-loading expenditure makes more sense than front-loading it, especially with the 2011 budget being so challenging already as it is and 2012 and 2013 Planning Rounds still officially expected to be “difficult”.
Besides, this way there’s all the time to do the redesign work, see how the EMCAT works (by 2015 the US will already be using it on their new Gerard Ford supercarrier) without slowing down the QE timeline at all.
Thus avoiding cost increases that no one wants.I’d be really surprised if things were done the opposite way.
And anyway, the F35C to fly off the carrier won’t be available before 2018 at the earlier.
Hello Liger, haven’t seen you for a while
Thanks Seawolf
Liam Fox statement in full
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/8349939/Liam-Fox-Libya-crisis-shows-why-were-right-on-defence-reform.htmlFair?
Not fair! Fox was on radio 4 this am saying just this. The truth is neither Camclegg or Osbourn wanted CVF and it would no longer exist if they had their way, type 26 is delayed by 4 years with apparantly a maximum buy of just 8. I’m sure the condems would have ok’d the puchase of type 45 and astute, not
More nice pictures:
The same pictures are on BAe’s website. The graphic of CVF has lost the ski jump and gained cats abd traps but no landing sight. Theres no new info.
Lawn dart
Theres space for 72 VLS in the forward position on Type 45’s if it helps:)
http://navy-matters.beedall.com/
This makes a lot of things clear!
Like the name
Good to get a replacement and as you say a wider more exciting choice.