Yes Bedford it is. The first is XT596 a pre production RN F4K
The second is XT597 on the Naval Air Department’s (NAD) steam catapult.
Under the aircraft just aft of the extended nose oleo is a WW2 jeep still in use after being left on the airfield after the 306 BG left.
The last is actually not on the steam catapult but on the cordite catapult carrying out trials on foam arresting systems. As stated the ‘aircraft’ was a full scale mock up made of steel.
I guess from the replies there are some other ex RAE Bedford people out there.
I worked in the Aircraft Servicing Section (ASS/H1) and Aeroflight Section (H3) from 74-79.
Best memories were those involving Sea Vixens and Ski Jump Trials with Harrier XW175.
Cheers.
No3
No 2
Slicer.
“they had the V tailed Scimitar prototype..Type 508 or 529 and a DH110 I think. What happened to them, I wonder”.
The Type 508 a derivitive of the un-built 505 gear-less carrier aircraft was registered VX133 and it ended its days as a deck trial aircraft. The first picture was taken at RAE Bedford on 3-5-1955, the second on HMS Bulwark on November 10th the same year.
Cheers.
John.
A more reasoned response. Well balanced and exactly what I mean too.
I sick of people who think the A321 is worlds better than the 757 when the fact is that is simply not true.
:confused:
His Majesty’s Sultans Flight has a B767-200 (in RBA colours) an A340 (in RBA colours) a B747-400, a couple of Gulfstreams and a couple of Blackhawks.
The majority looked after by Lufthansa.
His brother had a few as well but they were sold……………………..
Simple things that make life easier, for example panel numbers on the outside as opposed to having to check the manual on a Boeing to find out the number of a panel because it is written on the inside!
I am a real Boeing fan and until recently would hear nothing against them, but Airbus have impressed me, they have certainly got their act together and have listened to criticism and taken action.
Airlines will buy whatever is best for their operation and if the A321 is pushing out the B757 in the UK (and elswhere), it is obviously a better product.
Let’s not get sentimental about this.
As someone who has first hand knowlege of maintaining and operating both types I can vouch for the superiority of the Airbus product in all areas.
It is better built, easier to maintain, better supported by the manufacturer and preferred by every pilot I have spoken to (who has flown both).
The future for 757’s is freighter conversion, like it or not it is a tired design that can trace its roots right back to the 1960’s
I have worked on B757’s and 767’s since both types were introduced, the 757 for all it’s commonality is more akin to an old B737 than a B767 and is generations behind anything currently being turned out by Airbus.
It has had it’s day, just like Viscount, Constallation, and B707.
John.
One of my favourates
Mike, Flood, Robbo, thanks for the info this is the one of the airfield that shows B29s I think?
Cheers.
John.