dark light

suflanker45

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 259 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #1999481
    suflanker45
    Participant

    … and you expect to be taken seriously? :rolleyes:

    Actually its ol’Kimmy who doesn’t take YOU seriously. He and his dad have been screwing around with us since the end of the Korean War and we have done nothing.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #1999689
    suflanker45
    Participant

    You are serious?! This bombs would not only kill NK civilians – victims of this regime! – but would hit also South Korea! And how would nuclear bombs stop someone to use torpedoes or mines? The thread of the nuclear bomb was already useless during the Korean War – and then the USN and USAF destroyed nearly everything in North Korea using conventional bombs (and still do not won the war).

    *sigh* So you don’t want to nuke Pyongyang and destroy the leadership and central command and control (and a lot of NK civilians) but your ok with this regime continuing to starve,torture and generally beat the crap out of its people like its has been doing since 1945? But as I stated with Wanshan since you don’t see the oppression on CNN it doesn’t bother you. As for the Korean War it didn’t go nuke because Stalin threatened to invade Western Europe if Truman launched any kind of attack against China when they went charging down the peninsula. Western Europe which was still rebuilding didn’t want that to happen so Truman backed off (which made MacArthur mad).

    As for fallout, before you nuke make sure the wind is blowing northeast… well southeast as well but northeast would be bonus. :diablo:

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #1999691
    suflanker45
    Participant

    Balony!

    First of all, I’m not looking for excuses for anything or anyone.
    Second, if you had half an incling of what war is and means, you wouldn’t be propagating this position in the first place. War is serious business and going to war should not be decided on the basis of whether or not one ‘has balls’.
    Thirdly, if you looked at the studies of decision making under conditions of stress or crisis (e.g. Cuban missile crisis), you’ld realise the importance of independent thinking and restraint.
    Again, you – like me – have no way of knowing exactly what the SK ship was doing and were. We’re all aware of how information can be manipulated. Does ‘Gulf of Tonkin incident’ ring a bell? Or KAL 007? Therefor, IMHO, your assessment is premature.

    Excuses, excuses. So you think the ship sank in NK waters? Then the salvage team that brought the ship up were violating NK territory as well since the ship sank right where the explosion happened.

    So you want diplomacy to take its course? So do we have to wait another 50 years before we see progress. Diplomacy really did a bang up job on getting rid of NK nuke program in the 90’s….NOT:rolleyes: IMAO “letting diplomacy runs its course” is code word for we don’t have the balls to go to war so ol’ Kimmy stays in power and gives the world the middle finger.

    Is it the body count that bothers you about going to war? I guess you are ok with the thousands of NK’s who slowly starved to death over the last few years because you don’t see the piles of skin and bones plastered all over CNN or the BBC.

    People die everyday. Somedays a lot of people die at once. About 300,000 Haitians died in less than 20 minutes in an earthquake. How many died in that China quake last week?

    How many massacres occured in Africa say…in the last 72 hours. Sorry those didn’t happen since it wasn’t on CNN.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #1999810
    suflanker45
    Participant

    Wanshan you are validating my arguement about no one has the nads to go to war. You looking for excuses not to attack North Korea. Unless you have some proof that the vaunted navy of Paraguay sent its fleet of nuclear attack subs to sink a South Korean warship knowing that NK would get blamed.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #1999914
    suflanker45
    Participant

    So it looks like a torpedo. So what? Sure that’s and act of war but are we all ready to launch a full scale war against North Korea? Actually a few well placed nukes will end this threat in minutes but no one has the nads to do that because of the NK civilian body count and therefore ol Kimmy will rattle his saber every so often and maybe sink another ship or shoot down a plane or two and we do nothing and he’s still in charge.

    in reply to: Reality of F-35 production cost #2410935
    suflanker45
    Participant

    suflanker45,

    Read the two articles I posted to start the thread…

    I did and they are total BS. Its a snow job trying to convince everyone that the F-35 program is suddenly underbudget a mere two months after admiting the program was overbudget and behind schedule.

    Oh…guys your forgetting something else that’s very important….one word……inflation.

    in reply to: Reality of F-35 production cost #2411096
    suflanker45
    Participant

    Except that the actual cost of the F-35 is tracking below projections…

    Really? Then explain why SECDEF Gates fired the general in charge of the program in Feb 2010 and withheld 600 million in payments to LM because of rising costs and delays. Also the GAO in Mar of 2010 anounced that the cost of a F-35 would be around 112 million per copy and the Pentagon admitted that the cost of the F-35 has gone up by more than 50 percent.

    in reply to: Reality of F-35 production cost #2411361
    suflanker45
    Participant

    I agree with maus92. As the cost of the F-35 rise and they will the numbers will be reduced. The intial F-22 production numbers were over a 1000 with a two seater version and the US Navy was to get about 700 of a swingwing variant. As the costs went up the numbers went down and variants cancelled.

    So now we will be getting less than 200 of them.

    I won’t be surprised as cost for the F-35 go up nations will pull out and numbers will be reduced. Not because the F-35 is a bad plane it will just be too expensive for a “cheaper version of the F-22”.

    in reply to: Aircraft falling off ships flight decks #2002137
    suflanker45
    Participant

    In the 70’s an F-14 Tomcat fell off the flight deck of a US carrier and there was a frantic search for it because the US was worried that the Soviets would find it. We were able to find and recover it.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2003500
    suflanker45
    Participant

    The Saudis might be getting land based Trident??!!

    in reply to: START : Russia-US New Treaty Negotiations #1805114
    suflanker45
    Participant

    US reduces frontline systems. Russia dumps systems that are outdated anyway and is replacing with newer ones and since US agrees to reduce their strength Russia doesn’t have to spend extra money on newer more expensive systems to maintain parity.

    in reply to: Indian Navy News and Discussions #2006903
    suflanker45
    Participant

    Hmmm…so India as built a boomer and wants to build more. Perhaps they plan to cruise off the Chinese coast where most of their population is located.

    in reply to: Russia to commission new stealth bomber #2427486
    suflanker45
    Participant

    globalissues.org is a bleeding heart liberal propaganda piece of crap. pcfem is right about how entitlement programs are running the US into the ground. There are a few states that are going bankrupt and they aren’t funding the WOT.

    in reply to: Obama scraps BMD in Czech Republic & Poland #1812294
    suflanker45
    Participant

    Hey SS you missed the part about no one but Russia recognized.

    You need to lay off that vodka.:diablo:

    in reply to: Obama scraps BMD in Czech Republic & Poland #1812399
    suflanker45
    Participant

    Gasing Iraqi Kurds back in 80s was, too, internal matter so what do you care?
    Those lovely double standards… 😎

    …and did we go into Iraq in the 80’s out of concern for the Kurds? Nope. Did we go into Rwanda in the 90’s out of concern for the tribal warfare going at the time? Nope.

    I’m not condemming Russia’s power play, hell I’m admiring it. Its right out of Machiavelli’s The Prince.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 259 total)