You won’t find this is any mainstream media..

http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/05/it-makes-no-sense-ron-paul-thinks-syrian-chemical-attack-was-a-false-flag-video/
https://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-chemical-weapons-attack-in-syria-likely-a-false-flag/
https://investmentwatchblog.com/ron-paul-on-syria-gas-attack-it-doesnt-any-make-sense-zero-chance-assad-did-this/

He has foreseen it back in November 2016

http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/21/exclusive-ron-paul-warns-of-false-flags-and-a-shadow-government/

Did you just cite Ron Paul and Alex Jones???

You’re about to completely destroy your credibility.

everyone is posting normally except you.
its fine since no names are being mentioned.

A good number of threads you make are just trying to flame and bring out subjective opinions of others, seemingly to create arguments from that. You either lack maturity or you’re just trying to create tension and drama.

I don’t think obligatory has any solid grasp of fluid dynamics. Ideal shape is that of a water drop? What? Oh, and I’ve seen obligatory rave on and on about the Sear-Haack body without even fully understanding what it means. A true supersonic aircraft would not have it’s volume distribution symmetrical, the peak would actually be towards the rear because you calculate area through Mach-plane cuts. Sears-Haack volume is strictly for transsonic.

An F-35’s area ruling isn’t the most ideal or have the greatest fineness ratio, but the question is whether it’s good enough for its intended role and provide reasonably good air combat maneuvering capabilities. Some of this eyeball conclusions is laughable to say the least.

Of course, obligatory is also fond of repeatedly citing a “NASA study” (it’s actually a contract paper done for Boeing for their JAST configuration study) to show that the F-35 is “moderate observable” based on a preliminary configuration chart that doesn’t even detail RCS ranges for its classifications, and then concludes that GaN can then “nullify” it. And then he gets into nonsense like this.

i think that new clever material spell the end of the troubled canted vertical tail layout

And here’s a hint why that’s a load of crap and why shape is still the most important aspect of LO.

Enjoy your gain of 20+ dBsm. :highly_amused:

I’m sorry but when someone shows so much technical ignorance it’s hard to give him much credence. If he wants credibility, he should first read some books on fluid mechanics and electromagnetic theory.

Mig 25 copy.

Either your a troll or you are phenomenally stupid.

Can mods do something about these nationalist posters? They don’t understand aviation and their “contribution” is worse than useless.

Can China-bot and Russia-stronk take their retarded rubbish to their own thread?

Yeah, wow. That’s frustrating. 😀

It’s amazing that even considering the total mess of a patch job that the T-50-5R is, it’s still incredibly beautiful.

Goodness, I can’t wait to see some similar in-flight footage of the T-50-6. Just imagine.

*drools*

Beauty. Still don’t know about that camo though, I would really like to see the T-50 in RuAF blue camo. Though it might very well be dull grey after all the RAM gets applied.

But you are right.. no one would take the pig over a Raptor.. and likewise, no one would take it over a T-50 or J-20, either.. and that’s the whole point.. F-35 will be measured against these, not against F-18s and F-16s.

What do we even know about the T-50 or J-20 that assures you that pilots will always take them over the F-35? Pure aerodynamics? At supersonic speeds sure, that’s very likely true. Yet what about items such as LO, avionics, and other items that also determine mission effectiveness? It seems like you’re always operating with the assumption that somehow the F-35’s LO attributes and avionics can always be bested somehow and in the end it’s all a matter of kinematics. Even though Russia can have unique and innovative solution, truth is Russia has traditionally lagged the west in avionics.l, and for them to somehow so suddenly reach parity of the F-35 in terms of avionics is assuming that the years of advantage in experience and investment can just be hand waved away. What do you even base this on?

This doesn’t get into the fact that Russia is still buying more Su-30SM and China is getting more J-10s. Yet these planes likely stack up very poorly against the F-22, despite entering service well after the raptor, so should they be dismissed as well?

Pretty sure the Mach 2 run was done with the GE engine. He said that he finally got the chance to fly the GE engine aircraft since he was primarily responsible for the P&W engine aircraft.