RE: Mosquito Page Updated
Hi Glenn,
I like the music from 633 Sqd., too. The fly scenes are great as well, apart from the bits where they used models, no such thing as computer generated images, then. As for the rest of the film, I can only think of the 4 (FOUR!!!!:'( ) perfectly good Mosquitoes that were destroyed! And as for the script YUKKKK!!!!!!
TTFN,
Neilly
RE: KGB won’t let me post my pic 😛
Hi Ja,
My Mossie wasn’t in Scale Modeller (not my Knowledge, anyway). It could have been Richard Rawles’, who made the original.
TTFN,
Neilly
RE: Serious Mozzie..
Hi Glenn,
The Mossie is 1/5th scale & will be radio controlled. To fly it now (any model over 20Kgs.) you have to get a CAA exemption certificate. The model has to be throughly checked over by model inspectors, from the LMA (Large Model Association). Now, we also have to do so many test flights, before the model can be displayed in public. To fly the model in public you also need a BMFA (British Model Flying Association) ‘B’ licence.
The wingspan is just over 126ins. & the fuz over 96ins. The power comes from 2x 45cc four stroke petrol engines (about 6.5 hp. each) turning 22″x8″ 3 blade props.
TTFN,
Neilly
RE: Bf-110
Hi Phantom,
In that earlier post I put what Jeremy Howard-Williams thought of the ME 110. In the book he uses entries from his diary, this is what he wrote about the 110:
28th March 1945
“I fly the ME 110, my Log Book says:’First solo on type. A wizard job’. The ME 110 is rather like a twin engined Tiger Moth to fly, simple & uncomplicated, and I throughly enjoyed myself.”
I think that rates fairly highly on J H-W’s list of aeroplanes. For those who don’t know, J H-W was in charge of FIU, in the later stages of the War & was a very good night pilot.
Cheers for now,
Neilly
RE: Self sealing fuel tanks + Spitfire
Hi Ant,
Thanks for the input, Ant. So does that mean some aircraft had self-sealing tanks, while others did not?
Cheers,
Neilly.
ps Good to see you back!
RE: What is the greatest WWII fighter?
[updated:LAST EDITED ON 13-04-02 AT 09:21Â AM (GMT)]Hi All,
Regarding the various night fighters, we’re just speculating! If you read Jeremy Howard-Williams book Night Intruder, he flew most of these aeroplanes. The things he said about:
ME 110
Lovely aircraft to fly… just like a big powerful Tiger Moth… Excellent for night fighter work.
JU 88
Not a nice aeroplane to fly… took to much pilot concentration to keep it under control, not ideal for night fighter work.
ME 410
Similar performance & handingly as a Beaufighter
Beaufighter
Good sturdy aeroplane… early Mk’s had a lateral pitch problem… mostly cured with the dihederal tailplane
P-61
Big aeroplane… excellent duration & climb rates… wouldn’t be very good in a turning fight, but that’s not a problem for a night fighter, as most aircraft shot down at night never knew the enemy night fighter was there. Everything was electrical & caused to many problems.
Mosquito MkXXX
Quite simply the best night fighter of them all!
Cheers,
Neilly
RE: Kabir…
[updated:LAST EDITED ON 12-04-02 AT 10:16Â AM (GMT)]Suppose I’d betteradd my ugly mug, to the hall of ???
Neilly with his number one toy!
Attachments:

RE: Most successful aerial operation of WWII?
I’ll second that one, Glenn.
Neilly
RE: Most successful aerial operation of WWII?
I think you could only call Pearl Harbour a partical success. As I said before the PRIME objective was to sink the USN’s carriers, which the Japanese failed to do. This fact came back to haunt the Jap Navy, when the American Carrier bourne aircraft desimated the Jap Carriers & there by turning the tide, of the Pacific war into American & Allied favour. Had the USN lost it’s carriers at Pearl then, I feel certain the Japanese would’ve pushed them & the British & Commonwealth Forces, out of the Far East. Battle of Midway would still be my choice in the Pacific war.
Cheers,
Neilly
RE: What is the greatest WWII fighter?
Sorry, Phantom, but you’re wrong. The Mosquito was the first twin engine to LAND & take off from a carrier! Doolittles’ B-25’s were put on the carrier deck by crane. He only took off, no landings.
Squasher, I don’t think you put your foot in it! I’m a provocative sod at the best of times. I’m always interested in other peoples views, especially anything to do with aviation. There’s so much aviation stuff out there & I only have so much time to concentrate on anything to do with aeroplanes, so it’s good to get other peoples ideas etc. & if a particular aircraft, subject etc. crops up that I know little about & the discussion was interesting, then I go & have a read up on it. So Ifind these discussion forums a sort of short cut to interesting reading & so cut out the stuff which is of no interest!
Regarding the Mosquito, I’ve had a ‘love affair’ with this aeroplane, for nearly 40 years (I got an Airfix model for my 9th birthday & been hooked on the Mosquito, ever since!). So I’m very passionate about the Mosquito & can usually tell when others know little about or know all the wrong things about this superb aeroplane. This is why I push the Mosquito cause, whenever I can.
TTFN
Neilly:-)
RE: Yorkshire Air museum
Ashley, what about Tangmere Air Museum?
Neilly
RE: Self sealing fuel tanks + Spitfire
[updated:LAST EDITED ON 11-04-02 AT 09:03Â AM (GMT)]Hi Christer,
Many thanks for that. I feel a letter coming on!!! I’m in one of my pedantic moods this week, so a letter of complaint will do very nicely.
Thanks again,
Neilly
RE: What is the greatest WWII fighter?
[updated:LAST EDITED ON 11-04-02 AT 08:56Â AM (GMT)]Hi Squasher & All,
Squasher, I was interested in your thinking over the Mossie. The Mosquito was the first twin engined aeroplane, in the World, to Land & take off from the deck of an aircraft carrier (HMS Indefatigable, March 1944). Lt.Comm. Eric Brown was at the controls. After several landings & take offs the payload was increased till the Mosquito was taking off with maximum armaments.
I agree the P-61 didn’t have much time to prove itself, however, from the books I’ve read, admittedly written by RAF people, who either trained the US aircrews or actually flew the P-61, they were not that impressed with it. They were, however, all very impressed with it’s climb rate & endurance. However, it doesn’t alter the fact that over the skies of Europe the only aircraft , the P-61 nearly shot down, was an Allied Mosquito!
Looking at the armaments side, I think 4x 20mm Cannons pack far more ‘punch’ than 8x 0.5″ machine guns, but that’s only my opinion. Perhaps someone can put us both right? The Mosquito Mk.XVIII (Tsetse) even had a 57mm Molins cannon (which the Americans later tried in the B-25) for use against shipping & U-Boats. It was very accurate & effective. Mosquitoes sank several U-Boats & a lot of German shipping, with this weapon.
The Mosquito was used in the Far East (The Australians even made 212 Mosquitoes). There wasn’t a problem with the original British made Mosquitoes. However, there was a major problem with the Canadian built Mossie. The Canadians used a different type of glue in the main spar, which was more sesptible to fungus attack. When they were making the spars they also left small gaps in the lamination, which allowed the fungus to get in. Once de Havilland sorted the problem the Mosquito once again proved itself, to be an excellent aeroplane.
Now the V-1 Sites: I took my figures from Basil Embry’s book Mission Completed (He in charge of 2nd TAF, so should know what happened!), the Bostons of 2TAF destroyed 1.5 V-1 Sites, so I guess it was a joint operation. The figures make interesting reading:
8th Air Force B-17; destroyed 30 sites, used 195.1 tons of bombs
9th AF B-26; destroyed 26 sites, used 223.5 tons of bombs
2TAF B-25; destroyed 11.5 sites, used 224.8 tons
Boston; destroyed 1.5 sites, used 344.3 tons
Mosquito; destroyed 19 sites, used 39.8 tons
(The bomb totals are averaged)
83 & 84 Groups Typhoons; destroyed 5 sites, used 266.8 tons
So draw your own conclusions from the above.
And finally, the good old Beaufighter, excellent aeroplane!
Look forward to all your comments,
Cheers,
Neilly
RE: What is the greatest WWII fighter?
Squasher,
I’m interested in your several of your choices;
Night fighter a P-61?
Light bomber Mosquito?
Medium ” Mitchell?
I’m interested in the reasons for your choice (not least being a Mosquito anorak!). The P-61 didn’t shot a single enemy aircraft down in Europe (the only one that was nearly shot down was a Mosquito & that managed to evade the P-61 & landed back at Manston on one engine).
The Mosquito as a light bomber? 4,000lb bomb load, more that a B-17 flying to Berlin could carry (3,800lbs).
Medium bomber? If one looks at the destruction of V-1 sites, the Mosquito took far less bombs to destroy a V-1 Site than any other bomber. The Mosquito destroyed 19 sites to the Mitchells 11.5 & used 39.8 tons of bombs to destroy a V-1 site compared to the B-25 which used 224.8 tons (big difference).
Let me know your views.
All the very best,
Neilly
ps I know it says single engine aircraft, but what the hell!!!
RE: Most successful aerial operation of WWII?
[updated:LAST EDITED ON 10-04-02 AT 09:57Â AM (GMT)]Pearl Harbour didn’t achieve it’s main objective either. The US Navy aircraft carriers were not attacked (for the obvious reason, they were still at sea!). The carriers were one of the prime reasons, that Japanese force finally lost the war in the Pacific.
Carrying on the Pacific War theme, surely the greatest battle & victory was The Battle of Midway? The brilliance of the American Commanders & the bravery of the USN pilots. Especially the bomber/torpedo crews, who knew they didn’t have the range to attack the Japanese carriers & return to their own carriers, but still went. This was courage of the highest order!
The Battle of Midway, would be my choice from the Pacific.
Neilly