dark light

neilly

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 642 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RAF Lossiemouth in WW2 #2111579
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: RAF Lossiemouth in WW2

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 01-04-02 AT 09:12 AM (GMT)]Hi Ross,
    The books I mentioned in my last post made no mention of Groups/Wing etc. So I’m having to do some reading up. However, I will state again that 540 Sqd. wasn’t formed until 19th Oct. 1942. It was formed out of H & L Flight PRU at Leuchars. As far as I can tell they were never based at Lossiemouth, but DID have detachments there(& many other places, too). Having just started to have a read up on 540 Sqd. their Command Assignments were as follows: No.1 PRU 19/10/42; No.106 (PR) Wing 26/06/43-15/05/44; No.106 (PR) Group 15/05/44-07/05/45.

    C U soon,
    Neilly

    ps It might take sometime, I’m going through Roy Conyers Nesbits’ Eyes of the RAF, a good book, but ‘heavy’ reading!

    in reply to: Tech Education 2 – Elevons. #2111587
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Tech Education 2 – Elevons.

    One thing about this forum, if you miss the slightest thing someone WILL notice (I’m pleased to say).

    Neilly

    in reply to: Tech Education 3 Stabilators & Tailerons #2111589
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Tech Education 3 Stabilators & Tailerons

    Hi Keith,
    There was a programme, on the History Channel last year, all about the sound barrier. The Americans, in the form of one C Yeager esq. claimed the AMT was their invention. There was some film of an Auster, taken during the War (about 1943, I think), using an All Moving Tailplane (or for the Cousins, All Moving Horizontal Stabilizer or AMHS). So it was most definitly a British invention. However, the US were the first to use it for supersonic flight (sound familiar- British invention then someone else see’s the possibilities & uses it before us!).
    You’re right about the F-86, too. The first production aeroplane with an AMT.

    Cheers,
    Neilly

    in reply to: P-40 MTO operations #2111597
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Warhawks in North Africa

    Don’t panic Phantom I read your post & I’m sure others have, too.

    Neilly

    in reply to: A bit of Technical Education. #2111661
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: A bit of Technical Education.

    A good place to start with, the basics. Good scans, too.

    Neilly

    in reply to: BBMF Lanc Flypast #2111665
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: BBMF Lanc Flypast

    If this is correct, perhaps one of the best kept secrets since Operation Chastise!

    Neilly

    in reply to: RAF Lossiemouth in WW2 #2111671
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: RAF Lossiemouth in WW2

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 31-03-02 AT 06:43 PM (GMT)]540 Sqd. was not formed until 15th Oct. 1942. There is no reference to Lossiemouth, what so ever. (The 3 books I’ve looked at are Squadrons of the RAF by James Halley, RAF Squadrons by CG Jefford & Mosquito Sqd. of the RAF by Chaz Bowyer). There is no reference to who’s control they were under, at any time. However, you’re correct about the areas that they were photographing- primarily German, Italian & Vichy shipping, before photographing mainland Europe in preparation for D-Day.
    21 & 82 Sqds. you’re quite correct (should have looked further back!!!) apologies!x( Doh!

    Cheers,
    Neilly

    in reply to: Tech Education 3 Stabilators & Tailerons #2111674
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Tech Education 3 Stabilators & Tailerons

    One slight correction, I think the All Moving Tailplane (AMT) was first used on an Auster, back in the 40’s, as an experimental device. I know several well know American test pilots have claimed the AMT as an American invention!

    Neilly

    in reply to: RAF Lossiemouth in WW2 #2111773
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: RAF Lossiemouth in WW2

    Hi Kev
    140 Wing were known as the Gestapo Hunters. It comprised of 21, 464 (RAAF) & 487 (RNZAF) Sqds. The Wing came under 2 Group & then 2nd TAF.
    You’re correct about the school being hit by accident. This came about because W/C. Kleboes’ Mosquito hit a chimney (or high object, can’t quite remember. Old age!!!) & crashed onto the school. There was alot of smoke coming from the crash site & several Mosquitoes that followed bombed the school, thinking it was the Shelhaus. I can look up all the details, if you like.
    2 good books to read: Gestapo Hunters, about 464 Sqd, but includes the other 2 Sqds. & Mission Completed by Sir Basil Embry, who in my view was one of the all time greats, of aviation in WW2. If you liked Johnnie Johnsons’ book, you’ll love this one! You’ll have to track it down from somewhere like ABEbooks.com as it’s an old book. I have an original 1957 1st edition copy.

    Cheers for now, off to play model aeroplanes.

    Neilly

    in reply to: RAF Lossiemouth in WW2 #2111778
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: RAF Lossiemouth in WW2

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 30-03-02 AT 10:31 AM (GMT)]Hi Ross,
    I don’t think 540 Sqd operated under Coastal Command because it was a Photo Recon. Squadron flying Mosquitoes. Their main bases were Leuchars (Oct 1942)& Benson (Feb 1944 to March 1945). Then they went to Coulommiers, returning to the UK in Nov ’45. In fact No1 PRU was the first flight to use the Mosquito on 17th September 1941. This flight went on to be 540 Sqd in Oct. 1942.
    No.2 query; 82 Sqd. which I thought operated in the Far East. Again another Sqd. which eventually operated my favoureite- The Mosquito.
    No.3 query; 21 Sqd. was a Fighter Command Sqd. doing mainly intruder work They were part of the Gestapo Hunters Wing.
    Interested in any comments.

    Cheers,
    Neilly

    in reply to: A bit of Technical Education. #2111791
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: A bit of Technical Education.

    I think it’s a great idea. I, for one, read a lot, but sometimes the authors of books, articles etc. assume we’re total conversant with all & everything to do with aeroplanes, flight etc. So it would be nice to have somethings put into lay-man terms.

    Cheers,
    Neilly

    in reply to: P-40 MTO operations #2111842
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Kittyhawks in North Africa

    Well done Phantom, you’re spot on. In the latest edition of Flying Scale Models (got the right mag., this time!), there’s a correction to some facts which books & publications get wrong. I’ll copy out some of it, as it’s quite interesting (not much time now, work or Mrs. Neilly get in the way of playtime!!).

    Cheers,
    Neilly

    in reply to: P-40 MTO operations #2111912
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: P-40 MTO operations

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 28-03-02 AT 10:48 AM (GMT)]In last months Scale Modeller there was a whole pile of stuff about the P-40. Lots of piccies & scale drawings etc. There’s also an association for the P-40. I’ve left the mag. at work, so I’ll post the address, later.
    Here’s a question for you all; Which air force was the first to use the Sharks Teeth on the nose of the P-40?

    Neilly

    in reply to: WW2 radio callsigns #2111984
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: WW2 radio callsigns

    If there are no replies, then the number of views listed, doesn’t get updated.
    I always look at all postings, but only reply if I have something to say.

    Cheers,
    Neilly

    in reply to: "They think it's all over…" #2111986
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: “They think it’s all over…”

    He was a pilot with 105 Squadron. I had the honour of trying to find one of his navigators, last year. An excellent pilot, a great commentator & (from what little I know of him personally) very nice person.

    Condolences to his family,

    Neilly

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 642 total)