dark light

DeHavEng

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 120 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Venom gunsight and radios wanted – HELP! #1270225
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    You might want to try Source jets….I do believe they have afew venoms they’d love to get rid of;)

    in reply to: Oddie fasteners required #1271481
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    Good Luck finding Oddies!!!! Rocking Horse Doings comes to mind:diablo:

    in reply to: Unidentified Canopy part? #1272599
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    also note the barrel lock and hasp at the forward edge……distinctly not aircraft regulation

    in reply to: Aircraft part numbers #1274225
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    Anybody got access to supersession lists? I have a lot of Hardware part numbers which I cannot get LAS Aerospace or ISO Parts to find in there databases.

    anything specifically?

    in reply to: Aircraft part numbers #1274229
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    26FY Sea Vixen
    26FN Sea Heron

    10-2 Sea Vixen MkII
    14-2 Heron MkII
    14-2UN Heron MkII Nose Undercarriage
    14-2UM Heron MkII Main Undercarriage
    14-2F Heron MkII Fuselage
    14-2FS Heron MkII Fuselage Services
    the list goes on

    in reply to: Qualifications in aircraft restoration #1281056
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    This is an issue that has been greatly debated in the classic aircraft community, not only by museums but aircraft operators as well. It is best to divide into two distinct sections, those that want to restore an aircraft to STATIC museum quality, and those that want to restore an aircraft to LIVE airworthy trim.

    I will deal with the former first: There are organizations that run courses on the restoration of aircraft to museum quality and I believe they have already been mentioned several times in this thread. but quite frankly as long as you are enthusiastic, willing to commit your time (and occasionally money) and suffer the incessant nagging you will receive, when you have spent the entire weekend up to your elbows in the corroding mass that you are trying to restore to it’s former glory, instead of cutting the grass or taken the mother-in-law out to the local shopping village, then the only limiting factor is how authentic you want things to be.

    And now the Latter: Here things become complicated. Unless you have proven experience of aircraft work (i.e. an apprenticeship) the CAA will not grant permission for you to work on aircraft by yourself. There are occasions where the CAA will grant permission for people with some engineering experience (i.e. car mechanics etc) to work on live or restoration to fly aircraft so long as their work is inspected and signed off by a Licensed Aircraft Engineer, preferably with a rating on that aircraft type, at every stage of work. If you are a time served apprentice you are able to work on an aircraft, until it becomes necessary to perform duplicate checks at which point a licensed Aircraft Engineer is required.
    This section can also be divided in to several sections. These are, permit to fly aircraft (typically ex-military aircraft), Special C of A aircraft (aircraft capable of carrying passengers but not on a fare paying basis) and full C of A aircraft (aircraft that are either charter or part of an airline to carry passengers). This again brings varying degrees of operational requirements from the CAA and qualification requirements.
    Over the years several companies have offered apprenticeship schemes, Air Atlantique, Jet Heritage and De Havilland Aviation to name a few. Of these only Air Atlantique has actively pursued the recruitment of candidates but unfortunately this has since ended. Some companies and collections have at one time or another offered cross training on other aircraft type i.e. if you had solely jet experience you could normally find an organization or individual who would be willing to train you in piston engines or fabric repairs.
    Unfortunately now, the classic aircraft industry is in decline. The skills base that was around 10 years ago no longer exists and there are ever diminishing numbers of people interested in joining the community. Those that do find themselves in an industry that is woefully underpaid, where training is non-existent and where officialdom does everything in it’s power to get rid of them.
    To all young people reading this I have this to say as terrible as it maybe. I am your age, I have been in this industry now for nearly 5 years. during that time I have gained valuable experience from some truly wonderful people and I have throughly enjoyed myself. BUT, I have incurred massive debts, the wage I am paid can’t support myself or my family and I am apparently in the top end of the pay scale for the industry. This is not a sector that offers great potential for career prospects unless you are able to provide the finances to gain your licenses. I am now seriously considering my position in the industry not only because of the pay but also future training, career prospects and the ever present specter that the next CAA regulation (in cahoots with the EU) will finish the industry.
    The maintenance of classic aircraft is becoming the domain of the retired, soon to be retired and the rich. This is a state of affairs that will not be able to sustain it self for very much longer, as the remaining skilled people either move on to better paid jobs or move off this mortal coil. I personally bitterly resent having to move out of the industry for the reasons I have given, as I dearly love the work I do and the people I work with. There are very few industries that have the camaraderie and pleasure of coming to work that this does, but unless something changes the industry will die on it’s feet.
    In short you are best starting your career in the commercial world with people like Marshalls, Serco, Fleetlands or an airline and moving to classic aircraft when you have a good 20 years experience under your belt.

    in reply to: Prop blade identification #1299549
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    Blade shape suggests either a De Havilland or Fairey Prop, a close look at the butt end I could narrow it down to one of the two. The stencilled ‘Q SET 0 35 FINE’ could possibly indicate a reversable pitch prop

    in reply to: Parts identification request #1308438
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    oxygen hose cover?

    possible but most P.S.E. kit has penny covers rather than d’s (personal survival equipment)

    in reply to: Two de Havilland (?) Control Columns on Ebay #1308650
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    blimey I wonder how much a couple of very moth eaten window pillars will fetch

    in reply to: Parts identification request #1308659
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    looks like the standard cover to a plessey plug socket to me, most likely internal to the airframe as one externally mounted would have some means of fastening to prevent it flapping in the air flow. Sorry cann’t help on the aircraft, if I’m right plessey plugs are fitted to just about every aircraft from 1930’s to present.

    in reply to: Help required to identify these V1 parts please. #1312705
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    their uniform size, shape and that they appear to overlap each other leads me to suggest some sort of shroud or shield possibly a heat shield of some sort or cooling gills.

    in reply to: Cold War Historical Flight #1250188
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    God yes please, a cold war flight, why hasn’t this been discused sooner?;) Sea Vixen paired with Bucc possibly a gannet thrown in for the ASW side of things as the FAA contribution. Lightning paired with Vulcan as the QRF RAF contribution. Last but not least a brace of Gnats and Jet Provosts for the Flight training.:diablo:

    in reply to: G-CVIX Sea Vixen Status (merged) #1261770
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    Although I am no longer connected with De Havilland Aviation I try and keep up to speed. XP924 is currently maintained in Airworthy trim waiting for the day that either a suitable sponser can be found or the EU and insurance companies become alittle more realistic on the insurance front. XP924 was involved in DACT exercises with Typhoon’s from Conningsby in the summer of 2006, during which she played the role of a low level heavy fighter bomber. She is ideally suited to this role and aquitted herself with the best possible outcome against a flight of 5 Typhoons and the subsequent bombing run. Continued use of XP924 in these exercises is unknown. Aircraft used in most DACT exercises are civil registered and operated, i.e. HHA’s Hunters, FRA’s Falcons. XP924 makes fast taxi run almost every month, those wishing to observe should consult DHA’s website for date’s and timing’s, however in the new year DHA and BAM will be moving to different hangers on the opposite side of the airfield with little public access. This is due to the current expansion plans for Bourne’mth Intl that involve the demolishing of the current BAM/DHA hanger to make way for a new larger terminal.

    in reply to: Classic Flight Update (inc News on the Shack) #1292449
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    How is the Heron (behind) progressing?

    Doesnt look to have changed much recently.

    Bruce

    The Heron is progressing, we are currently work stop for various reasons but hope to be able to start again soon.

    in reply to: Closure of Bournemouth Aviation Museum (merged) #1292568
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    What about the BASCO hanger 😉 ? Will there still be a pinic area and veiws off the rwy?

    James

    heck you’ll need to ask bam about that but I doubt there will be views of the runway, it’s a pretty restricted view from the north side

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 120 total)