dark light

DeHavEng

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 120 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Interesting item on ebay #1324284
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    Well don’t worry if you missed a bargain for £1, perhaps the vendor of this grey painted canopy might take a similar offer you never know your luck !

    http://www.milweb.net/index2.html go to vehicle park, then aviation and marine

    Aww what the heck it’s probably worth more in scrap value

    in reply to: Gnats over Jersey #1327267
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    An interesting question but surely just as interesting would be details of the routing and support aircraft?:confused:

    how true….that would be very interesting to know particularly as gnats with slippers have an endurance of about 50mins tops. The most logical route would be to stage via france and spain, but les frogs aren’t particularly fond of vintage warbirds and pathalogically loath vintage jets.

    in reply to: TSR.2 Memories project #1242531
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    Hmm, wonder how many would prefer to divert the ‘Vulcan to the sky fund’ to getting XR220 airworthy at Cosford??

    me sir ohohoh please sir me me me me

    in reply to: TSR.2 Memories project #1242537
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    Just wondering, exactly how many TSR-2’s were planned and/or hoped for/proposed for the RAF?:confused:

    Two things have always struck me about the TSR-2. Firstly it always seems like a continuation of the air ministrys love of extravagant aircraft/requirements (V/STOL transport aircraft, Mach-3 bombers and interceptors, supersonic V/STOL aircraft etc). Secondly it always seemed like a theatre rather than tactical bomber, medium if you like, kind of in line (if smaller than) the Tu-22.

    One other question, Wikipedia (by my own admition far from a reliable source) mentions that improvements were planned to enhance the payload, does anybody no whether this is true? Were there any proposals for developments or evolutions?:confused:

    Perhaps people may have read the series print of a what if scenario that was fleshed out in a modellers magazine covering some 6 issues shortly after the release of Airfix’s TSR2. The detail covered in this series was impressive, including the proposed and ‘what if’ payload of TSR2. I believe this ranged from something like (please bear in mind my memory is hazy) 6 WE.177 freefall nuclear weapons on wing pylons and fuselage hardpoints to a conventional load of 24 iron bombs on wing pylons and fuselage hardpoints. Many other payloads were envisaged including the possibility of a blue danube under one wing with an expendible stores pod on the other. I am sure some were artistic license but none the less impressive

    in reply to: TSR.2 Memories project #1242571
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    Every disaster creates an opportunity for those who can see it.

    I had just lightly tossed aside the chance of a flying career to pursue an unrealistic dream of aircraft design when the TSR2 scandal broke. In a moment of undeserved inspiration it occurred to me that it marked not just the end of a British aircraft, but the beginning of the end of the whole British aircraft industry. A quick U-turn, a bit of humble pie and I managed to slip back through the flightdeck door…. and I never regretted it. That flash of foresight was indeed a glimpse of the future.

    So you see, I have mixed feelings when I look at those pictures of the destruction of TSR2 – a bit like the guilt felt by the sole survivor of an aircrash.

    Does anyone else remember pieces of TSR2 printed circuit board being sold as jewellery? Ounce for ounce they must have cost the Taxpayer more than platinum. Will we ever learn?

    While i was still with De Hav we had a couple of printed circuit boards come to us in a box load of spares ostensibly labelled aircraft parts c/o Boscoombe down. I wonder……..:D

    in reply to: Anyone who is not moved #1255117
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    Now that’s PROPER flying!!!:D

    in reply to: Restoration to flying status..what education? #1260279
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    from experience at least one licensed guy on type and depending on the size of the project 3-6 guys with several years practical experience on aircraft (and type preferably) and maybe the odd apprentice here and there

    in reply to: Hurricane crash at Shoreham Airshow #1262356
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    My deepest condolences to the pilots family. In such a tight knit community as the vintage aircraft scene the loss of one of our own is deeply saddening, made more so by the man and his great appeal and respect from others. May you have fair skies, a good tailwind and a friendly shore to land on.:(

    in reply to: Glow in the dark Viper #1265033
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    christ I’ve been working with those things for going on 4 years now!:eek: perhaps that explains the strange glow my wife complains about in bed each night…or was that just the curry I had:D

    in reply to: Source Jets de Havillands for sale #1266403
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    last time I looked they definitly were showing their age, and x number of years in the open has done them no favours at all. The best of the bunch have already been picked off, G-DHZZ (Vampire T55)to Norway and G-DHTT (Venom FB.50) to BAM as a static. The remainder may or may not ever fly again pending a detailled examination of the hulls but certainly it would cost alot more than they are worth to bring them up to airworthy trim (I believe a decent vampire currently retails at around 25-30K). It’s a crying shame they’ve been left as long as they have, certainly the Admirals Barge T55 was an absolute beauty.

    in reply to: What are Warbird safety height limits these days? #1278739
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    What are Warbird safety height limits these days? I have seen inside Spitfire cockpits that have printed notices – max 12000ft. This I assume is for two reasons, it’s just below the oxygen assisted level and for insurance purposes, which is understandable. But are there any warbirds that are permitted to use oxygen now and fly heights of 20,000, 30,000 or higher? What are the risks today compared to the war years? What are the current regulations?
    If this is not allowed today, when I wonder was the last high level warbird flight in the UK, or worldwide? Anyone know?
    Which leads me onto today Sunday 10th June, for joy of joys it was great to see the memorial Hurricane and Spitfire for 3 seconds as they flew north at, it looked like about 2500 ft, off to the Cosford show. Now in 3 seconds you can’t get focused into plane id numbers, but those merlins were purring away nicely. Coming from the south west did they stop off at Staverton airport to refuel before the show?
    Next time please guys can you give me a little bit more warning. how about publishing a route plan and time schedule, so I can be ready at the top of the hill!I digress, anyway they seemed very low, and I remembered one Spitfire pilot, I think it was Sq L Paul Day, once saying that a safe operating height was around 4,500 ft min. This would give the pilot sufficient time to plan a forced landing should a sudden emergency arise, within a 360 degree area, as opposed to say 90 degrees at 2500 ft.
    Would any warbird pilots out there like to enlighten me please?

    regarding high flying warbirds. Most jets currently on the airshow scene will transit at high altitude. G-CVIX when travelling to and from europe was cleared to high altitude regularly, a) to get her out of the way of commercial traffic and b) it significantly improved her endurance.

    in reply to: Red Bull Sea Vixen. No more sponsorship. #1245349
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    I hope not and would appreciate any gen from those in the know – not details if sensitive but just some reassurance.

    Otherwise what arm-and-a-leg load of cash are we looking at if we were to attempt passing a hat round?

    Was there a big approaching spares problem that we knew little about or some other major airframe or engine problem?

    Although I believe my name should now be ex-DeHavEng (I’ve now left De Hav, some what tearfully, for pastures new) I do still try and keep up with developments as and when they happen. At the time of my departure the problem was mearly (a glib comment me thinks) the funding to keep such an enormously expensive aircraft flying. It certainly wasn’t spares (Sea Vixen spares, Sea Vixen spares, how many TONS would you like) or to my knowledge unservicability. All I can say guys is, if you want to see her fly get out your cheque books, there are big bills.

    in reply to: Red Bull Sea Vixen. No more sponsorship. #1267778
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    she won’t be available as on saturday I wouldn’t have thought, unless the guys can be persuaded to come in again. Sorry saturday is your best bet

    in reply to: Red Bull Sea Vixen. No more sponsorship. #1268425
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    Well if BAM are posting it on their website already I’d say that saturday is a certainty. I look forward to seeing afew of you there! Bring as many friends, relatives or hell just drag people off the street so long as they pay the entrance fee. http://www.aviation-museum.co.uk (news section)

    in reply to: Red Bull Sea Vixen. No more sponsorship. #1269740
    DeHavEng
    Participant

    I don’t think I’m doing any harm posting this as I believe the more exposure the better. Next Saturday March the 24th at DHA Hanger it is planned (this means things still can change) to have a ‘Press Day’ for XP924. This will involve the area infront of the BAM hanger being cordened off and XP924 parked in the middle with her wings down. Members of the public will then be allowed to get up close and personal with her (within reason obviously, we don’t want little Johnny climbing in the cockpit and pulling the ‘yellow and blacks’, much though the little s**t might deserve being catapulted through the air:rolleyes: ) and snap as many pictures as they like. Hopefully a small portion of the standard museum adimttance fee will go into the coffers of DHA for XP924’s upkeep. As I said I don’t believe this is any great secret as the more people that know about it and attend the better for obvious reasons. But if it is I’ll be told:dev2:

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 120 total)