dark light

Tin Triangle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,108 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A-W Meteor NF.14 WS788 Restoration Thread #814274
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Does the heart good to see the Meteor all snug inside – thanks for the update and good luck with the winter transformation!

    in reply to: Aerospace Bristol merged with Bristol Freighter for UK #816612
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    “I believe there are three near complete Beaufighters in a freshwater loch in Scotland”

    That’s a new one one me – any more details?

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2017) #817320
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    If it means a large building for some or all of the airliners, this ought to be a good thing. But I fear that they’ll stay outside but less accessible (it’s a long walk up to the west end) with correspondingly reduced revenue for DAS. We really can’t afford another Cosford debacle…

    in reply to: Mystery image of Dragon Rapide. #818021
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    I was on Scilly last week and this all looks pretty familiar. I’d say this is about here:
    http://streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?x=91902&y=10653&z=115&sv=91902,10653&st=4&ar=y&mapp=map.srf&searchp=ids.srf&dn=602&ax=91902&ay=10653&lm=0

    The shelter belts and fields tie in well with those currently to be found looking N. The white building is probably the farm at
    http://streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?x=91822&y=11241&z=115&sv=91822,11241&st=4&ar=y&mapp=map.srf&searchp=ids.srf&dn=602&ax=91822&ay=11241&lm=0

    As someone said the fields have all been subdivided since. Scilly was pretty windy last week and bulbs and other market garden crops grow much better in smaller fields with more shelter when there’s Atlantic gales to contend with!

    in reply to: The story of the Walrus in Plymouth. #818683
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    We stayed opposite it in a Travelodge a couple of years back. The sign now features (I think) a Fokker Triplane. I was confused by this!

    in reply to: Spitfire T9 PT462 moves to Duxford #823919
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    A civil scheme, for a change! G-AIDN wore some super schemes, but I was thinking actually of the air racing scheme worn by AB910 in the 1950s…

    in reply to: BBMF 27/09/17 (Pic Heavy) #828680
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Looks like you did and all! Lovely photos, I’m very jealous!

    in reply to: Report on RAF Scampton airshow. #831487
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Nice photos!
    I went on the Saturday and thought it was a very promising start for a new show.
    One more small correction – the parachute display team were the RAF Falcons not the Red Devils-note the appropriate canopies in your excellent stack photo!

    in reply to: MOTAT Sunderland finally going inside #831494
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Thanks Errol – it was following you on Flickr which alerted me to to this piece of news!
    Fouga – according to the MOTAT aircraft blog the turret restoration is yet to be tackled – so they have presumably left them in their previous state. Photos of NZ Sunderlands in service definitely show the turret glazing, if not the guns, fitted.

    in reply to: Undercarriage leg help #831908
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Taking into account what Whitley Project said, Defiant is the best match I can come up with.

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-OYUKtPdUSGo/U0Bb7D_bKoI/AAAAAAAAGTc/K_xHLnYvCd0/s1600/defiant+9.jpg

    Your second picture even has traces of black on the upper portion!

    in reply to: Undercarriage leg help #831914
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Doesn’t look quite right for P-51 – the outer surface of the curved portion is too flat, and the whole section seems to thick/solid. Compare http://data3.primeportal.net/hangar/domeric_barbot/p-51d/images/p-51d_16_of_51.jpg
    Not sure what it is though! Is the “Lockheed” makers plate a clue, or did they make undercarriage legs for other manufacturers?

    in reply to: G-FURY #832433
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Wonderful quality photos! What happened to this aircraft in the end?

    in reply to: DH Sea Hornet -A Survivor? #833369
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Shoot me down if you like, but I think it’s a great shame that this will end up a flier.
    We’ve discussed ad nauseaam the levels of originality in the airworthy Mosquitos coming from NZ – and to me it’s never been much a problem that the entire fuselage and wings have been replaced, because the Mosquito is not a rare type, and the joy of seeing one fly (I presume, I can’t afford to go to American and see one and I never saw RR299) outweighs the loss of originality. You can go and see 20-odd intact Mossies worldwide.
    But here we have a substantial chunk of a completely extinct type, which David assures us is in excellent nick, and which could form the solid basis of a static recreation more or less in its entirety, without any being lost. Instead it’ll no doubt end up being robbed of metal bits and then forgotten about. I think I’d rather see a 30% original static Hornet than a 5% original flyer with the remaining 25% discarded.
    Just my 2p…

    in reply to: Kermit surveys after hurricane Irma #834198
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Looks like he got away pretty lightly!

    in reply to: RAFM Hendon ~ 09Sep17 #835284
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    On that thought, I think if I were CEO, I’d turn Milestones into a brand new “What does the RAF do for us?” sort of gallery, specifically focusing on recent (Falklands and onward) conflicts and showing a range of current/recent aircraft types, exploring their role and emphasising the diverse tasks the RAF performs in the modern world. That, instead of an almost empty BoB hall, would be my centenary venture!

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,108 total)