dark light

Tin Triangle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 1,108 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Thanks for the pics! Looks like a good solid base for a project 🙂

    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Congratulations on a happy end to this saga! Any pics to share? 😉

    in reply to: VTTS Hard Facts Finally Coming Home To Roost? #820175
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    A well-publicised funding drive, started early enough, and the aircraft could have been loaned to eg. Elvington together with a ring-fenced sum to pay for a new hangar large enough to take it, plus Victor XL231 and some of the various other Cold War runners already on site. Win-win for both parties I’d have thought, and the Vulcan would have sat outside for no more than a few months at most. Ho hum.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2016) #821957
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Many thanks to DCW, Pen Pusher, Duxman and all the other regulars and irregulars for all the updates, scoops and jaw-dropping photography. Here’s to 2017, and Happy New Year!

    in reply to: Unexpected encounters with aircraft #824614
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    My partner and I were driving through a more or less empty bit of mid Wales this year and were bemused to round a corner to find a farmyard complete with Jet Provost in the next field…

    in reply to: Your best Historic Vintage aviation moment of 2016? #828716
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Seeing the Sea Vixen going round the bend at OW, and finally getting to see the Fury, at Legends. Think those two top it for me. Very jealous of everyone’s flights!

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing – (2016) #832228
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Thanks Howard. Any plans yet as to what scheme it’s going back into? Some early post-war RAF scheme would look terrific!

    in reply to: Spitfire to Pima #833572
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    The thing I really want to see “over here” on loan is a B-47.
    As for the Spitfire, why not send one to Pima? As others have said it’s hardly a backyard museum with a few mouldering airframes. Still, I can see the point about it bring the FR14 instead of something more commonplace though.

    in reply to: A-W Meteor NF.14 WS788 Restoration Thread #834819
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Great stuff, as always! There’s an impressive amount of progress visible on the pages of this thread, just goes to show what a dedicated team can do!
    The “Dixey” noseart almost reminds me of the Little Weed of Flowerpot Men fame – maybe it’s just the grainy image…

    in reply to: Swift to Finningley #835197
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]249919[/ATTACH]

    Via the Jet Art Facebook page (and credit to them).

    What a stunner!

    in reply to: Delights for 2017 #836077
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    DH9, at last? I’m also keenly anticipating a complete Hampden fuselage next autumn!

    in reply to: 100 years of the RAF SE.5 #836370
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Thanks for the heads-up!
    In celebration here’s a shot of the OW example I took at the last airshow 🙂
    https://c7.staticflickr.com/6/5519/31143488646_5dd14d1b14_k.jpg

    in reply to: Buried Spitfire parts!! (Possibly) #841268
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    I suspect Bruce knows what he’s on about!
    To my layman’s eye, it looks like early Vampires had similar wheels?

    in reply to: Shoreham Pilot #843799
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Police investigation and AAIB are two completely different agencies and the police have to be involved due to the deaths of the bystanders.
    Obviously their may be criminal proceedings if found anyone is to blame and not just a very sad accident.

    True, but surely the point is that the police aren’t necessarily qualified to judge what caused the accident (and thus decide whether there’s a ground for criminal proceedings) until the AAIB report is out? Just seems like jumping the gun – after all we can’t yet rule out some cause for the accident that has nothing to do with the actions of the pilot. When the report is out, and if it should become clear that pilot error caused the accident, then obviously there’s a case for bringing manslaughter charges.

    in reply to: Shoreham Pilot #843819
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Seems odd that charges would be announced before the AAIB report had been published?

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 1,108 total)