dark light

Tin Triangle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 1,108 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Duxford Diary 2014 #971022
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    That detailed report on the fate of the Shack much appreciated as well as the 2015 plans for the AAM.

    Seconded. I was seriously worried that IWM would quietly dispose of the Shack. Plans for the AAM sound interesting, although I’d be sad to see the F-100 go-as an aircraft based prominently in the UK in the Cold War surely it deserves to stay?

    in reply to: Victor Tanker XL189 #971029
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    I think it was on the gate at Waddington from its retirement, as part of a pair with XM607 – until some higher chain of command decided that one large gate guard was enough.

    Picture here:
    http://www.airsceneuk.org.uk/oldstuff/2007/431blackbuck/xl189.htm

    in reply to: Eugene Bullard #981867
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Ah-I was thinking your dismay was simply a result of the awful pun chosen for the title…

    in reply to: WW2 aircraft build quality #981891
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Wasn’t the build quality of late-war German aircraft supposed to be increasingly dismal, due to poor quality alloys, slave labour, sabotage etc?
    I’m sure I read that late FW-190s, Me-262 etc were built very badly.

    in reply to: Search For a Spitfire #983474
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Isn’t it the guy with the jet-powered, strap-on flying wing?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3W_ETPh_Nw

    in reply to: F4F to fly in UK #985952
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Seems a bit unlikely that they’ll pass muster with the CAA if they are indeed coming. I appreciate that they probably have a better safety record than the Lightning, say, but presumably the Phantom comes under the same “large, afterburning, electrically and systems-complex” category?

    in reply to: Roy Nesbit RIP #988462
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    That’s a great shame, his History of the RAF was one of the first books that got me into aviation history.
    RIP.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2014 #989642
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Great photos as always Pen Pusher, DCW, Duxman etc!
    The answer to this is probably “no”, but:
    Is there any suggestion/rumour/confirmation of what the IWM plan is for the Shackleton? I really hope that they are dismantling it to start on an in-depth restoration, but I just get the horrible feeling that it’s about to be disposed of…

    in reply to: Strathallan Aircraft Collection – latter days #990532
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    XK655 was built for BOAC as the first Comet 2, G-AMXA. It was converted to Comet 2R, electronic intelligence gathering (ELINT) configuration, by Marshalls of Cambridge, and flew with 51 Squadron from Wyton. I believe that the Comet C.2 versions had the rebuilt pressure shells with the oval windows but the three 2R’s retained the square cabin windows. The forward fuselage of XK655 is now in the Al Mahatta Museum, located at the old Sharjah airport, UAE, and is restored in BOAC colours.

    Thanks (plus DaveF68!) for clearing that one up-I didn’t know that any of the RAF comets were BOAC conversions, and also hadn’t really appreciated that at least some of the fleet were in use for ELINT from the start.

    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Perhaps a short run of new builds a la Flug Werk wouldn’t go amiss? I suppose a twin with fuel-hungry engines would be less appealing than an Fw190 in the current climate-but then again the 110 has the massive advantage of being a (practical) two-seater with options for dual control, etc.
    Such an undertaking would also have the advanntage of being able to supply static components and sub-assemblies to help restorations out-am I right in thinking that Flug Wek did this for one or two static 190s?

    I’m probably just swayed by dreams of a 110 mock-dogfighting at Legends with R4118 and the two new Hurricane 1 restoration (P3717 and P2902)… 😀

    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Nice website, I hadn’t realised that three “109G”s were airworthy (or at least potentially so in Germany.
    Now, wouldn’t it be super if we saw an airworthy 110 in the next few years?
    We can only dream 🙂

    in reply to: Cosford's Kestrel and other Capers #992825
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Thanks Anon for the Kestrel pics. It’s amazingly complete (and remarkably different instrument-wise to the Harrier!)

    in reply to: All Out Warrior #992827
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Welcome! That’s a super piece-what medium do you work in?

    in reply to: Cosford's Kestrel and other Capers #993467
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Anon- I would! The rapidity of the Kestrel’s restoration has left me wondering how complete it is internally-although I must say they’ve certainly done a super job on the outside!
    Thanks Tim for your posting 🙂

    in reply to: Proctor Restoration To Flight #994816
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    I was wondering how your restorations were going. Some stunning work here, that Mk.3 is looking fantastic! What a good decision to paint her in the ATA scheme too 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 1,108 total)