dark light

Tin Triangle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 1,096 through 1,108 (of 1,108 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Nimrod Museum Allocations #1106614
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    *Pedant Alert*

    Wasn’t XL321 a Vulcan and XL231 the Victor?
    Come to think of it, the ‘Rod in question is XV231 as well.

    Sorry Lindy’s Lad…

    in reply to: IWM's F-86 Sabre and the P-59 Airacomet #1149185
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    The Vampire was built in 1947 and the Duxford Sabre was built in 1948 I believe.

    Is the Sabre really that vintage? I though they didn’t appear until about 1950-51, only being just in time for the Korean War.
    Or is that just me imagining things?

    in reply to: Wellington To Leave RAF Museum Hendon?? #1152899
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    It’d certainly look nice next to the Sunderland.

    If one starts worrying about “correct versions being in the right hall” then the Wellington should be at Cosford with the other trainers, and isn’t the He111 a transport version? (Or am I making that up?) Come to mention it, the BoB hall “Blenheim” is a Bolingbroke in reality, so that’s probably a trainer too.

    No, I think we should be grateful and leave the inhabitants of the BoB hall as is. Hell, where else can you see Bf110, He111, Ju88, Ju87 and Bf109 in a single line next to each other?

    in reply to: Milestones Of Flight, RAF Museum Hendon #1153481
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    If we’re talking about true “Milestones”…

    Keep the Bleriot XI (one of the first really practical and recognisable aeroplanes) as well as the Camel and LVG, as they show how far aviation had come by the end of WW1. The airship gondola exhibit is pretty significant too.

    Not sure about the Hart? I’d certainly keep the Gypsy Moth though (the birth of affordable aviation and all that)

    I’d thin out the WW2 fighters. The ME262 is undeniably significant, but does one really need BF109, Ki-100 and P-51? The latter two would look better at Cosford near the Ki-46 and near the other US stuff at Hendon respectively. I think to show the development through WW2, maybe Gladiator, Spit VB or BF109, and Me262. As for the Tempest, I reckon it’d be better at Cosford with the training displays. Nowhere at Cosford is target-towing depicted currently. The Mosquito should probably stay. It is quite seminal, and pretty much represents the zenith of piston-engined development.

    What’s left? I have no objection to there being a Eurofighter Typhoon, but maybe the prototype would be better off at Cosford.
    The Harrier and Hoverfly (to my mind) have an obviously assured place. And to represent the dawn of modern fighter aircraft, how about including the Phantom?

    I would get rid of the Miles Mohawk from the RAFM altogether. Don’t get me wrong, it is a luscious aeroplane. But seminal? Does it say anything that the Gypsy Moth doesn’t? I for one would much rather see it pottering about over Old Warden on a summer’s evening.

    The Mew Gull is an interesting exhibit, as it makes a nice memorial to Henshaw as well as representing the catalytic effect on aircraft development of inter-war air racing.

    And lastly, just to irritate lots of people :diablo: but accurately portray Milestones of flight, I’d get one of those remote-control UAVs now used over Afghanistan etc (or at least a model)

    Just my thoughts…

    in reply to: Aircraft ID please #1156389
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Short wings with even taper, straight. Engine intake in nose. Conventional tailplane.

    BAC Lightning.

    (OK, so I’m ignoring the pods on the wingtips and all common sense here…)

    Seriously though, JP or Strikemaster seems to me most likely. Minimans said the intake was in the nose, that doesn’t necessarily mean at the tip of the nose, does it? Could be near the nose on the sides, like a JP. And all the other criteria fit perfectly…

    in reply to: (Not so) Simple Spitfire Question ? #1159337
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    My own “W&R” wannabe list (that I have been tinkering with for about five years) lists 170(171?) survivors and 55 flyers, but then that includes some “sitters out” and some under maintenance. I do not have my finger as close to the pulse as I would like in this regard!

    in reply to: Introduction: (Robert Stanford-Tuck – Feature Film) #1097012
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Greg,

    Sounds fascinating! Fly for Your Life is, in my opinion, one of the most enjoyable books in its genre; and it sounds like you’re planning a thoughtful, accurate and exciting film. Can’t wait!

    I presume it’s a bit early for any idea of a timescale for release? :p

    in reply to: Unpleasant Spitfire canopy for sale #1099064
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    What gets me is, I have a pair of RR-Merlin engine plates from a Mosquito along with the correct provinence that I am thinking of disposing of – I dont know if I should now having seen all this cr*p!

    Graham,

    Asking price? 😉
    I am sure someone on here might be interested, and here at least you could sell to people who aren’t gullible or posessed with macabre tastes…

    in reply to: Proctor IV interior pictures anybody? #1099071
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Cheers Terry,

    That’s a Civvie mk V in NZ if my records are correct, those pics will be particuarly good for the instrumentation ,and stucture. This will be most helpful

    Anybody else have any old photos of the cabin in military spec, eg. of the radio operator’s table in machines set up for training? Or of an RAF machine set up for communications (I know mk. IVs could be used for both)? Would such a machine have had similarly plush seats in military service?

    in reply to: Heathrow 1970's Fire Dump #1099589
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Must have been the last survivor of its (sub-) type…? 🙁

    in reply to: Unpleasant Spitfire canopy for sale #1099594
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Makes you cringe, doesn’t it, that some people have to make money out of putting a disrespectful slur on history.
    And that there are enough idiots out there to be taken in by it all.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1101743
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    i was down at duxford the other week and was talking to one of the restoration team. according to him once 558 is grounded (he said in the next few years after parts lives have ran out but looking sooner than that now) it will come to iwm duxford.

    Oh dear. Poor XJ824…
    Remember what happened to that second Comet that arrived at Dux? They decided the bigger, shinier 4C with more history was much more important, so the C.2R (still almost unique) got reduced to saucepans.

    The day 558 arrives, they’ll line the two up, take a few snaps, and quietly wheel 824 away behind Airspace somwhere and cut it into oblivion.

    Can’t 558 go somewhere which hasn’t already got a Vulcan? (maybe East Kirkby, and it can do taxy rides with the Lancaster…ok, fantasy I know)
    🙁

    Tin Triangle (new about these ‘ere parts)

    in reply to: Spotted #1120254
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Living as I do SW of Bristol, not much comes over.
    But I caught a glimpse of a Spit PRXIX (presumably the RR one) flying over on the day of the Bristol Ballon Fiesta.
    I got overflown quite low by the Vulcan when heading east along the M4 on my way to Legends on the Friday evening. We were about level from Lyneham, which was where it was based for its little foray to Yeovilton that weekend. It came from the right, flew serenely over the kotorway wright in front, and disappeared to the east rather too fast for us to keep up! 🙁

    Despite my best efforts over two years this is all I have ever seen of it fly…

    I started at Oxford University this October, and suddenly there are all these VC10s roaring past between the dreaming spires, which is lovely! 😀

    Oh, and one Waco YMF which flew over Oxford in November.

Viewing 13 posts - 1,096 through 1,108 (of 1,108 total)