I’m afraid the site and the crates were nobbut a flight of fancy, inspired by 2hotwot’s reply….. I guess it could be a flavour of stainless, certainly stiff enough, sounds about right when pinged and would certainly make some sense in a shoe sole.
I do have another bit which I’m certain is aircraft related, and did unsuccessfully show it on here years ago. I’ll dig that out again and we can see what common household object it came from.
Avion ancien, very pertinent questions. I’ll put them to the experts on the Historic section of the Pan Global Safety Boot forums.
2hotwot, unfortunately we’re just beginners at this and didn’t think to look. We’re levelling an area of what may have been a wartime storage area. and found this wedged in some buried wooden packaging that needed to be covered over for an access road. We thought we were onto something!
Love it!
Drat, not a Spitfire data plate then… A few years ago I let someone on here down gently when I saw that his find was a crushed lamp shade, now I know how he felt.
How strange, thanks for letting me know.

I haven’t used them yet, but have had a brief chat with them about a job I need done. Their advice was 1% shrinkage for my alu alloy bellhousing.
Forgot to say, I’ve got to drop in at the airfield to arrange a lesson for cost centre #2, and I’ll ask about radio calls unless someone replies on here beforehand.
Dogged persistence finally paid off and I saw one about ten days ago as I passed to the North of the airfield. Marvellous, but still none over Hamble or where I race the boat!
Is it possible that Tighar are feeling the critic’s pressure and that this might be a convenient point to use Dubya’s immortal ‘job done’?
And I’ll be passing the airfield at about 15:00 on Saturday for a prize-giving at 16:00 at Hamble River Sailing Club. Just one will be fine.
Ever since you started this thread I’ve been travelling more hopefully to do my boating at Hamble. I drive along the Northern edge of Goodwood aerodrome on my way from home. I open the car windows straining to hear. I keep my eyes as skyward as possible all along the A&M27, while I’m boating and all the way home again.
Nothing, not one.
I did it yesterday, and now you tell me I should have gone today instead.
bazv, do you know anything else about that picture of Bader climbing in? The young airman looks very like my Father…
Here’s a link to someone who’s also researching it, and seems to be fairly sure what it is.
I don’t think anyone has addressed your new camera/same file number problem.
Some cameras will let you change the prefix e.g change IMG to IMH, and I think I’ve got one that’ll let me start the numbering from a place of my choice.
Another tip is ‘Bulk Rename Utility’ (http://www.bulkrenameutility.co.uk/Main_Intro.php) which is free and helps a non-gifted pc operator do what clever kids do with scripts.
To explain part of what I’ve been doing – scanning batches of slides and negative strips I’ve taken a packet of negs from one film, scanned it saving each image as the same number as the negative that it came from and then putting that packet into a sequentially numbered envelope. All images from that film go into a folder with the same number as the one I’ve just written on the envelope.
Now I have a load of sequentially numbered folders, all with and IMG01.jpg etc. in them. Firing up Bulk Rename lets me select all of the images in one of those folders and tell it to replace IMG with something, but to leave the 01.jpg part alone.
As an example I use:-
1991 as the year
03 as the month
07 as the day
10 to tell me that it was the first film I’ve found that covers that date, and means that if I find a later one I’ll call it 20, or an earlier one can be 05, in each case leaving me room to slot a few more around it.
204 is the number that I gave the envelope so that I can easily find the neg for a given image number.
I then tell Bulk Rename to turn IMG into 1991-03-07-10-204- Because I left the original image number and extension alone, Bulk Rename puts the two parts together and I get 1991-03-07-10-204-01.jpg It’ll do this for all the files you select by highlighting in the top pane, preserving those vital digits at the back end.
One attraction of BR is that it shows me what all the file names will look like before I press the big rename button. When you do you do get prompted to make sure that you really want to.
Having done that, I can take all the renamed images and drop them into one enormous folder and delete the one that they came from.
The OP could use it to quickly rename all his new pictures from IMG***********.jpg to NewIxus***********.jpg or do something like I do.
Anyway, it’s a very handy tool, its help is simple enough for me and don’t be intimidated by all the other stuff it can do – just work with the prefixes in the box marked ‘Replace (3)’ until you’re feeling more brave.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]242512[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]242513[/ATTACH]
My attempts at video with a lesser 650D won’t inspire you. At airshows it has been pretty hopeless when used hand held for the reasons that you’ve given (I’m afflicted with varifocals too). I also have a compact camera without a viewfinder and have the same problem – I don’t seem to be able to take photography seriously without one.
Using it on a decent tripod to record a friend walking and talking, and using AF, I was truly impressed by the capability and results. I felt like a real film maker! The noise from the AF was nothing compared to the wildlife, which was so bad that we had to record the sound separately and edit it together later. If I were to do it again I’d buy external microphones.