dark light

boguing

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 152 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 1/12 scale Spitfire wheels. #220933
    boguing
    Participant

    I have to bump this.

    1/12 is surely the most practical scale size. There must be suppliers for parts?

    in reply to: Carrier Conundrum #1059247
    boguing
    Participant

    It’s late and I need to do some sums.

    But my first design guess would be to have the ship fully equipped with huge reserves of fuel and spares and try to keep everything that worked aloft, with just one tanker needing to come back down for more (at a time I mean). Semi broken airframes aloft given some fuel to go home.

    Given that a big enough spring could stop anything, and that the Vulcan was not exactly glued to the floor, my hunch is that I should look at the t/o roll for a laden Victor without tearing it apart.

    in reply to: Spitfire wing drawing? #1063116
    boguing
    Participant

    I’ve emailed the Spit wing chap, and hope to help him out a bit, if he needs it.

    Having endure the usual mind-numbing political spin of a child’s prize giving evening, I didn’t have much else to think about.

    My project will now strive for 100% accuracy.

    Plan form, sections and internal detail, where visible, will be spot on. As will the u/c. Instead of the ‘outer portion’ it will be one whole wing as delivered to the fuse.

    Almost certainly at 1/12th scale. Rivets do rear their lovely heads at that size…

    in reply to: Spitfire wing drawing? #1063125
    boguing
    Participant

    This project has just got a lot more complicated, thanks to all.

    MASR’s link is looking very hopeful. Reading it now.

    in reply to: Spitfire wing drawing? #1063816
    boguing
    Participant

    Yep, just like that thanks Tony!

    Yer wouldn’t have a link for the foil section (typical not all – if it does anything other than reduce in line with chord)?

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1025416
    boguing
    Participant

    Not strictly eBay, but reckon that here is a good place for this one.

    Bought a protected push button switch, as used for starter motors, bomb jettison etc. WWII era.

    It’s been badly disguised with a coat of black paint on the cover. Red visible on the inside of the flap cover.

    Not a problem.

    The covered legend is “Jettison Live”. I can guess what it means and why, but Google doesn’t help with an aircraft ID.

    Any ideas chaps?

    As I inferred, no axe to grind with the vendor, but it’s going to be the starter button for a Jaguar straight 6 4.2 Litre powered Land Rover, and I’d like to pay homage to all of the eclectic parts selection.

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1033503
    boguing
    Participant

    Not strictly eBay, but reckon that here is a good place for this one.

    Bought a protected push button switch, as used for starter motors, bomb jettison etc. WWII era.

    It’s been badly disguised with a coat of black paint on the cover. Red visible on the inside of the flap cover.

    Not a problem.

    The covered legend is “Jettison Live”. I can guess what it means and why, but Google doesn’t help with an aircraft ID.

    Any ideas chaps?

    As I inferred, no axe to grind with the vendor, but it’s going to be the starter button for a Jaguar straight 6 4.2 Litre powered Land Rover, and I’d like to pay homage to all of the eclectic parts selection.

    in reply to: Technology To Make New Merlin Engines…? #1060878
    boguing
    Participant

    I spoke to Euro CAA about this a few years ago. Asked what I’d have to do to get a new design 27.1 Litre V12 certified.

    Simple answer was complete history of the process from design to manufacture and one destructive test (crankshaft failure to see if it stayed reasonably well contained).

    Not that daunting really.

    in reply to: Mosquito replica – Airborne! #1068286
    boguing
    Participant

    I admire them. The budget for full size was obviously out of the question, so the decision not to sit on theirs ars*s was the right one.

    Looks mostly like one, sounds good. Works for me.

    I do question the speed of the first approach, it looked like it was almost stalled for the last 100ft. Just had a read of the original Pilot’s Notes, and they warn of very high drag with gear and flaps, whereas flaps up is supposed to ‘flat’. No way to describe that as flat, which is why I query the advice given to the TP on stall speeds.

    He was very quick to catch the loop, so two lessons in very fast succession. I had to check that there was no tail wheel lock on the Mos. Why? Can’t figure that out.

    in reply to: Cruzex V #524881
    boguing
    Participant

    Dammit, every one a cover shot.

    Back to the camera manual for me.

    in reply to: Mercury/Aluminium Problems #1088797
    boguing
    Participant

    I’m not really sure that this should be too widely broadcast. Far too many bad people might get ideas.

    in reply to: Where did Dakotas go to die? #1130607
    boguing
    Participant

    The background looks too hilly for Hurn.

    DD

    That’s what I thought. Dad’s family were North London born. 1920’s.

    My grandparents ended up in Bournemouth after a London life. So, one daughter ending up down there is understandable.

    Where she met my uncle is what I need to establish. Her older brother (my Dad) was RAF, so there is a potential connection. (She was the caring one of three).

    I’m rubbish at names, but good at faces, and I can hear the laugh!

    in reply to: Where did Dakotas go to die? #1130704
    boguing
    Participant

    Well. Assuming that this was 1950 something, I’m certain that the woman on the left, in both images, is my Aunt. Emailed a link to my Mum, to see what she thinks.

    Aunt is still about, so the next week will see an answer. All that I know of her (other than that laugh she’s doing there) is that she married a man who at that time, worked for BAC at Hurn.

    So. Hurn. Is that possible?

    in reply to: Farnborough Validation Week #547477
    boguing
    Participant

    Here are three that my Daughter took yesterday too. Not bad considering she was in a moving leaf-sprung Land Rover…

    http://lh6.ggpht.com/_HAMeH2RgPZ8/TELV29tox7I/AAAAAAAAC8Q/SxBWgvv5w80/s512/typhoon%202.jpg

    http://lh5.ggpht.com/_HAMeH2RgPZ8/TELV4Hki0DI/AAAAAAAAC8U/I2Nex6aOL5Y/s512/A400%202.jpg

    http://lh3.ggpht.com/_HAMeH2RgPZ8/TELV46k12_I/AAAAAAAAC8Y/LFfAxtKhR3w/s512/A400%201.jpg

    in reply to: Advice and Suggestions for new RAF Museum Boss #1125341
    boguing
    Participant

    and above all bulldoze that God awful housing estate and replace it with something beautiful like an airfield so that you can get ‘living’ aircraft to your museum.

    Move the Museum to Northolt.

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 152 total)