I think that some may be missing a point.

The complainant probably contacted Key to obtain as much info as they hold on these individuals, in order to take action against them (not Key).

This high up moderator seems to have overreacted because he/she has no proper guidelines.

The number of these complaints is going to rocket, because the legal profession has realised that they can sit an office junior at a pc with the sole task of searching the web for defamatory comments regarding current and potential clients. Big money at low cost.

‘Something’ will have to happen. Unfortunately I can’t see what it is. I can’t see that the ‘grown-up’ action of saying “Actually a don’t give a hoot about what some troll says about me” being mooted by lawyers, do you?

Keys’ Mosquito mag gives:-

RAF: 4 14 58 81-PR 105 109 128 139 163 180 192 540 571 608 627 680
684

RCAF: 400

SAF: 60

USAAF 653 654 802 All PRs

One survivor. A52-600 at Point Cook. http://www.mossie.org/A52-600.htm

He was just using the original ‘Word!’.

You’re spot on.

Turns out that he was firing off a complaint about his Comet voucher being invalid.

Well my Pa ‘could’ have been in that hole, was RAF groundcrew so not likely (although he did get to fly fairly frequently on test.

Post War he took up gliding and powered. He nearly killed himself on various occasions.

So if it were his bones being shown I would not be in the slightest bit concerned. If DNA could identify them, my Sisters and I would be delighted to get them back. They are only the bones, not the man.

And I far rather see the bones than be in the position that the relatives must be in the case (on here) of a wreck where no remains were found. Despite the rather obvious facts.

I have CAD skills – send me something to draw.

I’m also quite likely to be buying a 3d cutter in some form or other in the next 12 months.

Rather be doing a Hornet, so happy to treat this as practise!