dark light

fotheringay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: When and where? #1165484
    fotheringay
    Participant

    Yes, indeed it was Sumburgh, probably taken late 70`s. Landing on runway 33 necessitated a curved approach to avoid Compass Hill.

    Interestingly, around this time, a F4 Phantom, from Leuchars on practice diversion, disregarded the curved approach and came straight in over the hill and overshot as intended. However, a successful landing probably could have been achieved if the aircraft was “dumped” on to the runway, which it was used to doing anyway!

    in reply to: When and where? #1166059
    fotheringay
    Participant

    Clue: The sea state is not normally like this!

    in reply to: Biggin Hill BoB 1961 – Historic collection. #1233888
    fotheringay
    Participant

    Great pictures.

    In those days, certainly up to the mid 60`s ,the BBC and ITV would transmit live pictures of the display from Biggin Hill on the Saturday ( only a one day display ,of course) to go out on their sports programmes. It is hard to believe that BBC and ITV would go head to head for such an event nowadays.
    I also seem to remember that there were CND protestors, on one occasion, who had cut the tv cables and messed up BBC`s Grandstand coverage!

    fotheringay
    Participant

    BA had a fatal crash 2.5 miles from Sumburgh on 6th November 1986 – 45 killed, 2 survived. A/c was G-BWFC

    And if my memory serves me right, the loadmaster and one pilot survived and, luckily, the Sumburgh SK61 SAR (GBDOC) was already airborne, in the area, on a training detail, so was on scene quickly.
    I think the cause of the accident was that the individual rotor blades went out of sync causing them to collide with disastrous consequences. After that accident Shell UK, the customer, insisted BAH stopped flying the Chinook and they used other smaller types.
    I think the problem with the blade synchronisation still exists, today, with the RAF Chinooks.

    in reply to: Type and Series Please? #1162585
    fotheringay
    Participant

    The answer to my question regarding Viscount N501TL is that the photo was taken at Sumburgh, Shetland.circa 1978
    The slightly unusual feature is that the aircraft has slipper tanks fitted.Although strangely enough, other folks photos of the aircraft taken at its detached base at Aberdeen, Dyce have the tanks off.I cannot imagine there was a problem with range from Aberdeen- Sumburgh.
    If my memory serves me right this aircraft had a bath fitted on board when operating out in the Middle East. Although there was no sign of it when I flew out of there. Seats were needed for the oilmen!
    Note the public road next to the aircraft!

    in reply to: Type and Series Please? #1163185
    fotheringay
    Participant

    Ok then, Viscount lovers, where is this, and what is unusual about it?

    IMG_0002

    in reply to: Type and Series Please? #1163909
    fotheringay
    Participant

    Incidentally, those 700 Darts had a slightly different engine note from the 800 series in that, when the aircraft was shut down on the apron, the props would windmill if the wind was strong enough, (which at Sumburgh was quite frequently).
    Having worked there on the ground, part time, in my younger days I vividly recall being asked to help on start up and hold the blades still. Unfortunately, the engine wouldn`t start unless the propeller was stationary. The procedure for start was that I would hold the prop still and when I received a nod from the aircrew then that would be the time that they would start the engine and be prepared to let go.

    I have never seen my hand move away so fast I can tell you when the blade moved!
    Interesting times!

    in reply to: Type and Series Please? #1164290
    fotheringay
    Participant

    It was Viscount 700 G-ARBY, just before her unscheduled night landing near Exeter – happily from which everyone walked away.

    Was that the episode where it ran out of fuel and literally glided into a field, short of the airport?

    in reply to: Lightnings at RAF Coltishall in 1974 #1166159
    fotheringay
    Participant

    Not many of these shots about (and not a great pose I grant you), but one of a F3 (718 I think) making a pass with reheat selected and and`gear down at Waterbeach, Burma Star Assn display circa 1973,74?

    I cannot remember whether it was Pete Chapman or “Oscar” Wild flying it, but was an impressive display, especially when lined up on `finals`looking for all the world as though he is going to land the thing on a 4,000ft? runway! And no he didn`t! Great pass though

    in reply to: T5 Lightning XS458 #1229776
    fotheringay
    Participant

    Just out of interest, what`s involved in bringing an aircraft`s paint scheme back to bare metal? Obviously a lot of hard work involved in removing it but does the paintwork somehow protect the aircraft?
    I agree; painting an aircraft silver to simulate bare metal looks awful and should be avoided at all costs. There is no substitute for attention to detail.
    Sorry Cranfield.

    in reply to: T5 Lightning XS458 #1230394
    fotheringay
    Participant

    I will look out for that.

    On another point of interest, and I know money is an issue here, but what is the likelihood of one of the Lightnings you have being “repainted” if that is the right word to use back to bare metal. Some of the squadron markings used in the 60`s were quite flamboyant (Firebirds etc) even though some of the squadron markings wouldn`t be appropiate to the mark of Lightning you have there, maybe. Anyway, the Lightning looks better “natural” .

    I would think bit of a crowd puller too. Just a thought.

    in reply to: T5 Lightning XS458 #1230480
    fotheringay
    Participant

    Hasn`t the display at Bruntingthorpe this Saturday been cancelled?

    in reply to: Lightnings at RAF Coltishall in 1974 #1179094
    fotheringay
    Participant

    Was lucky to see, and still vividly recall one of Pete Chapman’s last display’s at a Sept 74 BoB open day in the white tailed ‘696 and it was spectacular, especially his end of display Spitfire style ‘short finals’ IIRC…..
    Don’t think I ever saw better in the subsequent 13 years of Lightning solo’s.

    Yes he was good , but I seem to remember around Sept 1971 BoB Colt, Flt Lt Peter “Oscar” Wilde displaying the aircraft in great style. I seem to remember him overshooting rwy 04 with full reheat and climb into a tight right hand circuit and land at the end of his display. Never seen it done since. Really good.

    Funnily enough the previous year at Coltishall there was an aerobatic display pilot from the station for that years BoB but he didn`t perform at Colt but did at all the other venues. Quite why I don`t know. In fact there were no Lightnings to be seen displaying at all at Coltishall. Rumour had it the public were fed up with watching Lightnings! Hard to believe.

    in reply to: Lightnings at RAF Coltishall in 1974 #1179378
    fotheringay
    Participant

    Mark12, Interesting shot of the flightline at Colt, presumably the ORP on runway 22, before the “Big 16 ” got airborne for their display. Note the F1A with the Union Flag on the tail. I think this aircraft was the mount of Flt Lt Bob Lightfoot who was the station`s aerobatic display pilot . It was at this time that the aircraft had just come back from Toronto to appear in the Canadian National Exposition. Literally flying the flag!

    More details on this from http://www.mhas.org.uk/memories/RobertLightfoot

    in reply to: Lightnings at RAF Coltishall in 1974 #1179555
    fotheringay
    Participant

    Being picky….
    That’s not a Colt based Lightning, from the photo and the date, that’s clearly a 11 Sqn machine in the static park at Colt’s ’73 Battle of Britain airshow.

    I remember this one flying in from Leuchars as one of a pair. The other one diverted to Wattisham with hydraulic problems, ( not wishing to block the runway with slippery fluid just before an airshow!.)

    Incidentally, 1973 was the first year that the security of the aircraft in the static display was an issue. The IRA were the terrorist threat then and it meant that you were no longer able to wander round the aircraft at close quarters. Great for taking photos though.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)