dark light

kirtap

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 217 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2373817
    kirtap
    Participant

    Interesting!

    A few noteworthy points:

    1) If gripen is out because it’s radar is not mature enough, I wonder how they assessed the eurofighter radar
    2) If F-18 is out because of its engines, I guess gripen should be too?

    in reply to: F-22A Raptor at RIAT 2010 #2387366
    kirtap
    Participant

    cool IR-camera capture of F-22’s flying display:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58N6Plr17GU&feature=player_embedded

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2387759
    kirtap
    Participant

    To me, the extraordinary thing here is that anyone even mentioned Selex. What relevance does Selex & its capabilities have to modes in Rafale’s Thales radar?

    The extraordinary thing is that people are dicussing a non-issue like wheter or not RBE2 can do ISAR. It’s about implementing an algorithm.

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #3, Cachorro-quente! #2388629
    kirtap
    Participant

    Actually CPFH includes everything, but SwAF uses conscripts,
    where other forces uses technicians/paid labour, hence the differences $3000 -$5000

    This is not to be forgotten when taking Gripens low cost per flight hour from Swedish airfoce into consideration.

    in reply to: Stealth features , RAM , etc … #2386549
    kirtap
    Participant

    I don’t understand the fuss about Bragg Cell recievers. They are a legacy analog reciever used by many ECM suites and are being phased out in favour for digital recievers. A prime example of an ECM suite that are phasing them out is Spectra which is set to become all digital in the next(?) iteration.

    in reply to: Stealth features , RAM , etc … #2391068
    kirtap
    Participant

    Well, I think most of them (gripen, f-22, eurofighter, rafale) source from hexcel
    http://www.hexcel.com/
    http://www.airframer.com/direct_detail.html?company=121563

    in reply to: New Swedish stealth Aircraft concept? #2398994
    kirtap
    Participant

    They are not in the same plane
    Update: or where you talking about the Yakolev concept? It is in the same plane there.

    http://www.iei.liu.se/flumes/aero/gff/home/1.189785/Picture002hql.jpg

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2399281
    kirtap
    Participant

    IMHO the trend is to have shared arperutes for sensors, I think read that thats on Thales roadmap aswell.

    in reply to: New Swedish stealth Aircraft concept? #2399441
    kirtap
    Participant

    Found this on SAABs website.

    I very much doubt you found it on SAAB’s webpage. It’s basically a university project with slight input from SAAB / FMV.

    Anyhow, the URL for the project is http://www.iei.liu.se/flumes/aero/gff?l=en if you want to read more about it.

    in reply to: Boeing proposes new F/A XX – the NGAD #2401216
    kirtap
    Participant

    Here is another view:
    http://www.flightglobal.com/assets/getAsset.aspx?ItemID=34159

    in reply to: Boeing proposes new F/A XX – the NGAD #2401231
    kirtap
    Participant

    Interesting air-intakes on the one with canards.

    in reply to: French ECMs , history , technology and facts #2402084
    kirtap
    Participant

    Any more info (if you have any) on these special Bragg Cells and their EW applications would be much appreciated.

    http://bayimg.com/image/eamigaacg.jpg

    in reply to: Rafale F4 vs. Typhoon (ca. 2014) #2402380
    kirtap
    Participant

    Hoppefully news are good for this deal as well as upgrades for the 5th batch for the AdA with the funding of a stealth rafale demonstrator + spectar and RBE2 upgrades.

    Are there any details how such a stealth rafale demonstrator would look like? Something like the F-15 Silent Eagle perhaps?

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #3, Cachorro-quente! #2403052
    kirtap
    Participant

    Yeah well, I think however you look at it, the chanche of this ending up in SAAB/Boeings favour is pretty much non-existant unless Dassault or Sarkozy&Co manages to f*ck something up radically.

    That said I think its quite weird that the announcment gets pushed forward all the time

    in reply to: Assesment of b-2 signature levels #2407686
    kirtap
    Participant

    Those are not estimated in the study though. Only B-2 and F-117 is analyzed. But yeah, you are right, the b2/f-117 values might be totally of aswell. Their geometric models does not look super precise, so there might be a large margign of error there too. And whether or not their mathematical model for estimating RCS is correct, I have no clue. Just stumpled upon it by chanche when i was googling for info about f-117

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 217 total)