In the case of Sweetman and the F-35, there is at least the possibility that the AWST travel budget was more lavish that its Janeโs equivalent, so he was able to get closer to the programme and got to understand it (and its problems) better.
You would know that quite well, right? ๐
its a biased and uninformed article by someone who doesn’t seem to understand that it was the IAF that did the evaluations and its results are quite similar to what even the Swiss Armasuisse agency found (that the Rafale is up tops, followed by the Typhoon and the Gripen lagging behind).
Well, the swiss evaluatated Gripen C/D vs. upgraded Rafale vs. upgraded Eurofighter. Not really a surprise there, then.
The number of T/R modules are dictated what frequency the modules are optimized for. The diffraction limit gives the closest you can put the modules is half the wavelength.
Generalizing:
lower wavelength = less modules => less resolution, longer range
higher wavelength = more modules => higher resolution, shorter range
Depending on how frequency agile you want the radar to be with, you might want to have some wiggle-room as well.
With this in mind you must also factor in engineering decisions when judging performance penalties in regards to having 840 modules vs. 1000 modules..
Agreed, it ain’t happening. Sorry SAAB.
I foresee zero gripen naval sales.
We have seen massive breakthroughs in metamaterials the last 5 years.
Specially constructed metamaterials can bend EM waves, making the old saying that stealth is “shape, shape, shape and materials” to become “materials”. Problem is that current applications are very narrowband.
.. And there where ofcourse naval stealth designs like Sweden’s stealth demonstrator Smyge designed in the early-mid 80ies, designed by the defense research agency. I would be surprised if they did not also have aircraft designs.

Something that is not recognized much is that in parallell to developing the lampyridae in the 80ies, the germans had a far more advanced design with continuous curve stealth and pitch vectoring nozzle in Dornier LA-2000. Somewhat resembling McDD’s A-12 Avenger II.
EDIT: Well, forgot to mention it was AFAIK only a paper-plane, with no protypes.
Artist impression picture from flightglobal:
The demonstrator kept the radome AFAIK, so that would be the pre production NG due to roll out in March then, but i havn’t heard anything of it, and don’t believe it either.
Any info/link Kirtap ?
http://bambuser.com/channel/folkochforsvar/broadcast/1321456
It’s in there somewhere. Think around ~20 min or so in.
Odd Werin from FMV discusses different alternatives for future gripen roadmap. Two alternatives that was pitched was 1) the more expensive solution with F414 + raven aesa + structural changes or 2) smaller modifications to RM12 + miniturized version of the raven aesa + no structural changes
So it is my interpretation that a new larger radome would be needed
Gripen NG’s radome will be larger than Gripen A/B/C/D in order to accomodate the new radar
You can see gripens blocker in this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwu8wCNUpkA&feature=player_detailpage#t=73s
I read Sweden has some plan’s on a Gripen successor, including the length is set to 17 meters, posted here by BZZZ
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=90432&highlight=17+meters&page=12Scary they don’t wait a while on defining until some new engine tech is out.
FOI had a R&D project for fluidic thrust vectoring involving Volvo Aero a few years ago, “TVC/LO intag och utlopp” resulting in a few interesting patents.
Have a look at this:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/pdfb/documents/usapp/patent_pdf/2008/010/US20080104940/pdf/US20080104940.pdf
Read page 7 point 005. There is a reason why FS2020 was given modest funds and had most of it’s R&D carried out by master students doing their thesis work
(I can add that SAAB is interested regardless of the outcome of MMRCA)
I never quite understood what the F-22 offers in terms of sensor fusion and ESM that for instance Rafale does not.
I’d wager is the other way around.
Can someone care to explain that to me?
Yes. A nuclear programme existed and was research went very far, with the Agesta and Marviken reactors producing weapon grade plutonium. The whole thing was canceled in 60’s though because of lack of political will and costs, the money from the program was transfered to R&D for Airplane 37 (Viggen)