dark light

fabe

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 547 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New Broncos? #2464614
    fabe
    Participant

    I wonder how modernized Broncos would compare to Texan IIs and Super Tucanos. Well at least view should be much better.

    in reply to: More A400M problems… #2475123
    fabe
    Participant

    How about a deal? Airbus tankers for C-17s :p

    Well as much as I love European projects I think one should put politics aside when the need for a piece of equipment is so dire (I have seen German Transalls firsthand, believe me it was not a nice experience).
    After all one could licence-build them too, so there won’t be a loss of X jobs. And there are enough projects in which you could invest the money saved (for example a CH-53 replacement)

    in reply to: New Iraqi Air Force #2475237
    fabe
    Participant

    They could, it’s just nothing you’d buy and maintain two squadrons of F-16s for. Few 155mm howitzers could do exactly the same job from over 10 miles range. Now compare the cost…

    except your F-16 squadron is paid for by the US…

    in reply to: New Iraqi Air Force #2475356
    fabe
    Participant

    F-16s are very close to being the most worthless assets that Iraq can buy at the moment. Don’t see a single thing they could do with them given the problems they have.

    Strictly technically yes in a broader context no.

    Su-25s might be more apt for their needs but the F-16s are US made i.e. they probably won’t have too much for pilot training and spares (if they have to pay for it at all).
    The US also want to narrow the currently vast gap between Iran and Iraq in terms of military power. Of course this won’t be achieved with a few F-16s but it’s first step. Whether that makes sense or not is a different question.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2475974
    fabe
    Participant

    Nice job on those FAS pictures ๐Ÿ™‚
    Does the Salvadorean AF fly combat sorties against drug traffickers?

    in reply to: New Iraqi Air Force #2477090
    fabe
    Participant

    No it isn’t, the stars were removed from the flag some time ago because they allegedly are remnants of the Baath party’s ideology :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2477230
    fabe
    Participant
    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2480201
    fabe
    Participant

    Now that we are talking about Latin America, are there some good pictures of aircraft and helicopters operated by the Nicaraguan contra rebels?

    in reply to: How good is the L159 compared to other trainers? #2481413
    fabe
    Participant

    What about the Super Tucano? i think the Colombians are replacing their A-37s with it.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2482397
    fabe
    Participant

    Whatever the number Fabe. The point is that no HA-300 was ever designated or locally called “Al Qahirah” -300. That name belongs to the trainer HA-200B designed by the Spanish HASA and built under license by Helwan in Egypt. There are plenty of pictures of those two-seater in EAF markings wearing the arabic lettering ุงู„ู‚ุงู‡ุฑุฉ (Al Qahirah)painted on the fuselage sides.
    By the way… thanks a lot again for your pictures! ๐Ÿ™‚

    I don’t doubt the HA-200 was named ุงู„ู‚ุงู‡ุฑุฉ but still the name could have been used for two different aircraft. I did a small illustration to show my Mirage analogy. Same basic name – different aircraft.
    http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c339/fabe27/Qahira-Mirage.jpg
    To make it even more odd, Nasser’s missile was named ุงู„ู‚ุงู‡ุฑ too (the victorious but this time the male version)
    http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c339/fabe27/Al-Qahir-1.jpg

    by the way any good pics of the HA-200 are highly welcome ๐Ÿ™‚
    I hope I don’t discuss the issue too aggressively, I am simply a little obsessed with this aircraft (just in case you haven’t already noticed :p) I am really glad you like my pictures it took quite some time to take them ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2483134
    fabe
    Participant

    I had another thought, perhaps the museum scheme is a real Egyptian one but applied later on.

    Before being taken to Germany it could, for example, have served as an instructional airframe and painted with the then current Egyptian air force insignia. That would explain why the stencils are spot on but the markings are completely “wrong”.

    Perhaps I should ask someone at the museum.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2483174
    fabe
    Participant

    The fact is that the HA-200B trainers, those 75+ aircraft built by Factory Nยบ36 at Helwan, Egypt, were locally known as Helwan Aviation (hence the HA prefix) HA-200B “Al Qahirah”

    Well Al Qahira 300 is written on the museum aircraft. The HA-200 was NOT called “Al Qahira” it was called “Al Qahira 200” That is a big difference, i.e. the last designation could be interpreted as one model of a series of aircraft (like the Mirages)

    in reply to: How good is the L159 compared to other trainers? #2483226
    fabe
    Participant

    L-159’s rumor is a bit compromised by the almost useless L-159A attack version,

    Interesting point, do you mean useless from a technical point of view, or just useless for the requirement of the Czech Air Force?

    BTW Bolivia now has definitely placed its order for five single seaters and one double seater.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2483258
    fabe
    Participant

    By the way the model presented in a German museum, markings of the Egyptian air force is wrong. As the Insignias of the Egyptian air force in the sixties of the last century with the two Stars in the roundel, as well as the Egyptian flag.

    To be a little nit-picky it was not the flag of Egypt but the one of the United Arab Repbulic even if it consisted only of Egypt for some time :p

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2483260
    fabe
    Participant

    As far as I know the HA-200 was know as the Al Qahira-200 and the HA-300 as Al Qahira-300 with the first prototype named Al Qahira 300-001 and the second one Al Qahira 300-002. After all they were mainly propaganda weapons and therefore just HAD to have bombastic names ๐Ÿ˜€

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 547 total)