dark light

Satorian

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 690 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2514471
    Satorian
    Participant

    Hmm…let me try..

    “Te”–is “Tey” except pronounce the T as a spaniard would do ..as in “Te amo”

    “jas”–is “Just” without pronouncing the “t” at the end.

    Thank you! 🙂

    Wanting to read up on the aircraft I actually found Wikipedia to have a sound sample. Sounds like “Daejuzz” in English pronunciation or “Dedschas” in German one (which is native to me).

    I kind of like the plane, especially in standard grey paint. 🙂

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2514494
    Satorian
    Participant

    Can somebody enlighten me on how to pronounce “Tejas”? Is there a sample clip with the proper pronunciation available somewhere? 🙂

    in reply to: The Indian MMRCA Saga #2517060
    Satorian
    Participant

    Wow, finally. The Indian “soon” has already become a running joke in the industry regarding their MMRCA FRP.

    The economic part of their RFP sounds quite tough in terms of offsets and warranty, although one would have to see how the numbers pan out exactly.

    My biggest hope is that during the technical evaluations some interesting infos on the jets might leak. 🙂

    Satorian
    Participant

    Sounded like perfect sense to me, and in line with what a lot of other highly qualified people have to say also.

    What do you think he should have said?

    Paraphrased, here is what he said: “We have have been doing well, they have been doing well. The Typhoon is good, so is our Flanker. AWACS matters for everyone. Regardless of the plane a good pilot will use his advantages and exploit his opponents weaknesses.”

    That’s a load of platitudes. Is there anything in there that qualifies as information?

    Things that would have been informative and interesting to us are also very likely to be classified. Detection ranges, kinetic measurements, BVR/WVR combat records, or in general numbers would have interested me.

    Satorian
    Participant

    That sounds very much like polite, whitewashed PR talk. Low signal-to-noise ratio.

    in reply to: RAAF F111 sinks North Korean Drug Ship #2517757
    Satorian
    Participant

    Firstly, the ship was sunk back on March 23th of 2006, not recently, so this thread is more than a little out of date!

    Secondly, the ship was not manned, the crew had been seized and arrested, in full compliance with Australian law. The ship was impounded, and it was felt that the best way to dispose of it was to sink it in a military training exercise.

    Fair enough. I can see the sense and purpose in that.

    Thirdly, Australia is not in the habit of attacking vessels suspected of illegal activities, and pretending that the Pong Su sinking is an example of this is either ignorant, or intended to mislead. When vessels are suspected of illegal activity in Australian waters, every attempt is made to seek a peaceful resolution, preferably involving the arrest of the crew.

    And that’s the way it should be. Other posters here seem to think that everything should be bombed first and that it’s a grand spectacle.

    As for all the nonsense about legalising drugs, this is an aviation forum, not a hippy politics forum!

    As for all the nonsense about not legalizing drugs, this is an aviation forum, not a hawkish bible-thumping forum!

    In any case, just legalising something because its difficult or impossible to prevent from happening is ridiculous, otherwise you could argue for legalising murder.

    Self-inflicted harm is something very different from violence towards others. Otherwise… Did you ever drink something alcoholic? Did you ever smoke? Did you ever eat fast food? Do you consume sugar? Congratulations, you must be supporting the legality of murder.
    People take drugs for a reason and other people deal them for a reason. In my opinion it would make much more sense to analyze the systemic connections and deal with the primary causes.
    If you don’t want your closed heating boiler to explode, you put the fire out, not try to screw the valve shut tighter.

    If something causes harm to others, as drugs do, then it should be illegal, and every effort should be made to stop the trade, not to try and embrace the illegal activity.

    Causes harm to others? It’s things you use to “cause harm” to yourself. I’ve never heard of people injecting each other against their will heroin or people forcing a third person to take cocaine. Fast food? Alcohol? Cigarettes? What about those?
    All you do with criminalizing substances is creating a maelstrom of associated criminality, violence, evasion of the law and heaps of dirty money that is used for many wrong causes.

    in reply to: RAAF F111 sinks North Korean Drug Ship #2517983
    Satorian
    Participant

    Didnt take long for the Left-Wing, Do-Gooders, Lovey- Dovey, Hug a Terroist crap to find its way on this thread!

    You suffer from a severe case of NFC.

    in reply to: RAAF F111 sinks North Korean Drug Ship #2517991
    Satorian
    Participant

    Great, military taking judicial and executive power into its own hands while pissing on most human and civil rights.

    And all it does is spurning the black markets and driving prices up. The ones actually responsible for the transport, sitting somewhere in safety, are rubbing their hands and calculating their new profit margin.

    Way to go.

    in reply to: MAKS – 2007 #2518012
    Satorian
    Participant

    Does anybody know whether Aviation Week’s Show News will have issues on MAKS 2007?

    in reply to: Modern Military Aviation News from around the world #2518080
    Satorian
    Participant

    It’s not Tango’s fault. I’ve also seen the press release in another place and it had the same (presumable) mistake. Can’t really expect him to check them all, can we? That’s our job. 🙂

    Don’t shoot the messenger. 😉

    I still love this thread and think Tango is doing a great job delivering the news here.

    in reply to: AFM September Editorial #2518320
    Satorian
    Participant

    I would call transnational exercises the “shake their hands firmly to guess how hard they can punch” tactic. Or how hard the other guys training with the same equipment can hit.

    As no military hardware exists in a vacuum and its worth is only determined as measured against the competition, hasn’t this informational fondling and groping–trying to cop a feel– as well as finger-slapping been going on and on for ages, up to the point where everybody does it and nobody really minds?

    The German MiG-29A traveling the world happened exactly to educate allies about its capabilities though, which is a bit different from DACT even among allies in their dedicated defense assets, as the MiGs would see no operational use. “Curbing” the MiG-29 threat was no cunning stunt achieved by luring the German MiGs in, but in my opinion the primary intention with this kind of de facto NATO aggressor squad.

    I have to admit, I find this editorial nearly too tame for much controversy or afterthought. It had not crossed my mind that the affected Air Forces would take such intelligence actions personally, or would indeed even feel threatened by them, because there is nothing unexpected or surprising about them, no malevolence required. It’s the Forces doing their job, assessing their own strength by assessing other’s strength.

    in reply to: Libyan aircraft – what is still flying? #2518370
    Satorian
    Participant

    All four squads grounded.

    I don’t recall it very clearly, but I think I’ve recently read something of either refurbishings or exchange deals with MiG-31s being part of some arms deal with Russia.

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2518394
    Satorian
    Participant

    Will the Su-35 and MiG-35 fly at MAKS 2007? It starts tomorrow, right?

    in reply to: Russia 'renewing bomber patrols' #2518574
    Satorian
    Participant

    sferrin,

    I’ve read speculation recently that the Bear flights near the UK (which have been intercepted by Tornados instead of Typhoons) and near Guam during Valiant Shield already have been ELINT operations. It could very well be possible.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon news #2518636
    Satorian
    Participant

    Actually I screwed up on presenting my point and formatting my reply with punctuation. On range, the MKI is leaps and bounds ahead. Where I didn’t see the gap one could classify as a different class was payload.

    Too bad all those modern jets can’t be part of a televised dogfighting sport league or championship. I think it would beat F1 in ratings and water-cooler talk volume. 🙂
    I wonder why nobody did that yet. Get a few used MiG-29s or F-16s, fighter pilots, put advertising on and let them have weekly matches and shoot-outs. That would rock.

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 690 total)