dark light

optimator11

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 146 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Zimbabwe, cradle of democracy. #1911474
    optimator11
    Participant

    Rhodesia

    Using the correct name could be at least a start. Maybe if Henry Kissinger and his friends put the same effort into getting Mugabe out as they did getting Ian Smith out it would be a start.

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2493786
    optimator11
    Participant
    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2493799
    optimator11
    Participant
    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2493804
    optimator11
    Participant

    airbus wins

    Wall street Journal,

    Grumman and EADS broke Boeing’s lock on the market for aerial refueling tankers, winning a $40-billion contract to turn Airbus jets into flying gas stations for U.S. military aircraft, according to a person familiar with the situation. Full article to follow.

    in reply to: Fun with Google Earth part 2. #2527463
    optimator11
    Participant
    in reply to: Soviet Air Power #2549132
    optimator11
    Participant

    What would it take.

    Slightly off topic, but wasn’t it Churchill who was asked in 1948-9, what it would take for the Russian Army to reach the English Channel.

    His answer,

    Shoes!

    in reply to: Syria 'fires on Israel warplanes' #2507201
    optimator11
    Participant

    Y Net say, “Radar Blinded”.

    Who knows the real facts, for all we know provoking the radar net [I]was[I] the only reason for the intrusion into Syrian air space.
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3456456,00.html

    in reply to: B-52 carried nuclear armed cruise missiles by mistake : US #1794512
    optimator11
    Participant

    Armed B-52

    There is another theory:

    Wednesday, September 5, 2007
    Those five nukes on that B-52 may have something to do with Iran
    Staging Nukes for Iran?

    By Larry Johnson

    Why the hubbub over a B-52 taking off from a B-52 base in Minot, North Dakota and subsequently landing at a B-52 base in Barksdale, Louisiana? That’s like getting excited if you see a postal worker in uniform walking out of a post office. And how does someone watching a B-52 land identify the cruise missiles as nukes? It just does not make sense.

    So I called a old friend and retired B-52 pilot and asked him. What he told me offers one compelling case of circumstantial evidence. My buddy, let’s call him Jack D. Ripper, reminded me that the only times you put weapons on a plane is when they are on alert or if you are tasked to move the weapons to a specific site.

    Then he told me something I had not heard before.

    Barksdale Air Force Base is being used as a jumping off point for Middle East operations. Gee, why would we want cruise missile nukes at Barksdale Air Force Base. Can’t imagine we would need to use them in Iraq. Why would we want to preposition nuclear weapons at a base conducting Middle East operations?

    His final point was to observe that someone on the inside obviously leaked the info that the planes were carrying nukes. A B-52 landing at Barksdale is a non-event. A B-52 landing with nukes. That is something else.

    Now maybe there is an innocent explanation for this? I can’t think of one. What is certain is that the pilots of this plane did not just make a last minute decision to strap on some nukes and take them for a joy ride. We need some tough questions and clear answers. What the hell is going on? Did someone at Barksdale try to indirectly warn the American people that the Bush Administration is staging nukes for Iran? I don’t know, but it is a question worth asking.

    Larry C Johnson Bio
    Mr. Johnson, who worked previously with the Central Intelligence Agency and U.S. State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism, is a recognized expert in the fields of terrorism, aviation security, crisis and risk management.

    Posted by CRIMES AND CORRUPTION OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWS mparent7777 Marc Parent CCNWON at 2:46 PM

    Labels: Iran, military, Nuclear Weapons

    in reply to: General Discussion #308571
    optimator11
    Participant

    High Flight

    High Flight (1957) starring Ray Milland. Turner Movie Classics had this on a few days ago but I was only able to catch the last twenty minutes. A poor plot, poor acting, but seeing the 1957 RAF in color makes this film a step back in time. The aerial photography, especially those formation flights of Hawker Hunters are impressive and memorable.

    in reply to: The Last Film You Saw #1928489
    optimator11
    Participant

    High Flight

    High Flight (1957) starring Ray Milland. Turner Movie Classics had this on a few days ago but I was only able to catch the last twenty minutes. A poor plot, poor acting, but seeing the 1957 RAF in color makes this film a step back in time. The aerial photography, especially those formation flights of Hawker Hunters are impressive and memorable.

    in reply to: General Discussion #308588
    optimator11
    Participant

    Radio program that detailed incident.

    Roswell is now ancient history, but do we really know the truth?

    http://www.coasttocoastam.com/

    in reply to: Roswell is true! (?) #1928504
    optimator11
    Participant

    Radio program that detailed incident.

    Roswell is now ancient history, but do we really know the truth?

    http://www.coasttocoastam.com/

    in reply to: What's the first aircraft you've ever flown in? #435427
    optimator11
    Participant

    First plane I ever flew in.

    PAA DC-6B (Clipper Pocahontas I think), 1952 I know.

    Summer or 1952, the plane was brand new. New York to Shannon to Frankfurt. I looked it up to see if I could find the name. I did and the aircraft had quite a history!

    http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/history/q0129.shtml

    in reply to: General Discussion #321253
    optimator11
    Participant

    In Which We Serve

    A classic film with classic actors.

    Been years since I’ve watched this, they had it on TV and I couldn’t resist.
    Noticed a lot since I last saw it, that Ju-88 sure makes a lot of passes, over and over again strafing the Brit destroyer survivors in that big life raft. One by one they are hit, but by a miracle the lifeboat never catches even one of those thousands and thousands of machine gun and cannon shells! I started feeling sorry for those survivors, until I remembered the scene where they sank those unarmed German Caciques leaving the surviving troops thrashing in the water with a simple glance and shrug before moving on! They don’t make them like that any more, a true Period Piece.

    in reply to: The Last Film You Saw #1933905
    optimator11
    Participant

    In Which We Serve

    A classic film with classic actors.

    Been years since I’ve watched this, they had it on TV and I couldn’t resist.
    Noticed a lot since I last saw it, that Ju-88 sure makes a lot of passes, over and over again strafing the Brit destroyer survivors in that big life raft. One by one they are hit, but by a miracle the lifeboat never catches even one of those thousands and thousands of machine gun and cannon shells! I started feeling sorry for those survivors, until I remembered the scene where they sank those unarmed German Caciques leaving the surviving troops thrashing in the water with a simple glance and shrug before moving on! They don’t make them like that any more, a true Period Piece.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 146 total)