dark light

Geo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 63 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: NORTH KOREA Airforce and Air defences #2128385
    Geo
    Participant

    Not bad presumption, medo, but there is the radar screen on the original position.

    The big MFD is there instead middle block of indicators:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]253021[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: NORTH KOREA Airforce and Air defences #2128630
    Geo
    Participant

    :confused:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]252996[/ATTACH]

    Geo
    Participant

    it’s official, ca. 92-93
    one of many Yak-41 development studies, preceeding Article 201 aka Yak-43. last one is still classified.

    Thank you, Paralay & Flateric

    Geo
    Participant

    Yak-141 and advanced Yak vs F-35B

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]223347[/ATTACH]

    http://paralay.com/lfsyak/super_yak.jpg

    Dear Paralay, the “Super Yak” drawing is official? How old is it, please?

    Thanks,

    Geo

    in reply to: Shenyang J-21/31/F-60/AMF thread part 1 #2247056
    Geo
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]217783[/ATTACH]

    Nice, paralay! Next sketch to my office. Thanks.

    in reply to: New Chinese Stealth Attack aircraft #2252166
    Geo
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]217626[/ATTACH]

    Good job, paralay, thank you very much!

    Geo
    Participant

    since the Argentinian one seems mostly decided.

    Azerbaijan is interesting.. growing economic energy power
    military equipment primarily: Russia, Israel, Turkey

    Enemy = Armenia, Iran

    Russia was generally pro-Armenia, but with the money Azerbaijan can pour into Russian defense industries, and growing energy interests.. good chance Russia can ditch Armenia for Azerbaijan which would be more lucrative.
    but don’t count on new Sukhoi sales to Azerbaijan.. since Sukhoi is run by an Armenian.

    TF-X

    in reply to: PLAAF – Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2256163
    Geo
    Participant

    Something like a F-23 & T-60 marriage !

    But again, I think we should be careful to overestimate that “thing” … regardless how interesting it looks like !

    Hohoho! Nice thing! Thanx, Deinoooo!

    in reply to: PLAAF – Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2256182
    Geo
    Participant

    Wow, what is THAT ? Tail look YF-23-esque, while initially i thought it must be some sort of UCAV, but looking closer at the nose, it appears it has a cockpit, and an all transparent one at that! Don’t think it’s a fighter type because the intakes are above the wings. Some sort of medium bomber, chinese NGB ? If this turns to be real, man i’d be looking forward to the first flight, and have a laugh at a certain nation feverishly looking for increased stocks of toilet paper!

    Exactly, mack! It looks manned. Maybe some conceptual design of future striker in the same class as Su-34?

    in reply to: Stealth aircrafts have serious problem! #2270655
    Geo
    Participant

    You are making a good job for Czech Rep, rumcajs! 🙂
    (…vÅ¡ak taky máme být na co pyÅ¡ní… Díky.)

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2270763
    Geo
    Participant

    What is PSSh?

    ПСШ, probably Perspektivny Samolyot-Shturmovik

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2270766
    Geo
    Participant

    What is PSSh?

    Su-25 replacement.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2271214
    Geo
    Participant

    Looks like a Su-34M will come around 2020 timeframe.

    It would be very smart, pragmatic configuration of tactical air force for post 2025 timeframe: Su-34M, PSSh, PAK FA and LMFS.

    in reply to: The Chinese stealth UCAV start roll #2271986
    Geo
    Participant

    Why on earth do You think it is an “non-afterburning engine and exhaust installation” ??? … it’s more than clearly a standard RD-93 complete with its AB-nozzle !

    Why they choose this engine and even more why with an AB is – to admit at least now – beyond my imagination … but it is so.

    Deino

    Yes, its probably fully AB RD-93. Maybe intended for aircraft carrier without catapults (for ski jump).

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2272458
    Geo
    Participant

    Amazing how many are missing it, it says what it is right in the article.

    As to the rest:

    Thank you, Berkut.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 63 total)