I think the F-35 should be named as “Freedom”, since the Americans love their “freedom” so much.
OK. :rolleyes:
Phoenix sounds like a good name.
I wouldn’t mind hearing this one. I don’t know much about this bomber if anything at all.
Back to the F-22. Anyone heard any good stories on its performance or capabilities from this exercise or even since it went operational?
Firebar is as bad or worse than Mig-23MLD. OverG is a close runner up.
Firebar is the worst because he is able to spew an endless amount of delusional statements to blow threads out of proportion. No matter what you tell them, it never even registers in their mind.
Put any western engine in MiG-29 or SU-27, and these fighters will be limited to 40 to 50 degrees angle of attack.
The Cobra maneuver will be ruled out.
The Super Hornet is cleared for up 55 degrees alpha I believe. The Raptor can cruise at Mach 1.7 but the engines are also fine down to 0 knots or 60 degrees alpha. No Russian engine has that type of flexibility or performance envelope right now.
Air Forces Monthly, June 2005: (page 14)
-“An F/A-22 accident occured recently, because of flight control defficiency which allowed the aircraft to exceed its AoA and G limits which overstress the airframe.
The flight control was lost when the F/A-22 crossed the wake vortex of an F-16.”That is a good example of what should not happen with a new generation fighter.
It would not have happened if it had not been limited to 60 degrees AoA.
WTH are you talking about? What you said makes no sense. That incident happened almost two years ago. It was a FC problem not an airframe problem. Are you trying to say that no Russian aircraft has ever had a flight control problem? You truly are delusional.
Someone please shut this thread down. Firebar is just making untrue and useless comments again just to flame American aircraft. The thread had been dead for 6 months for a reason.
Of course that there is always a need for super fast interceptor.
Even if the attacking aircraft is not very fast, you should have an interceptor which is as fast as possible.
See 9.11 incident.
Right, if we had the MiG-25, 9-11 would have never happened. :rolleyes:
Another ridiculous Firebar thread. You can stop bringing them back from the dead where nobody wanted them back.
bring_it_on, just give up. MiG-23MLD has managed to ruin another thread with his stubborness and is incapable of listening to anyone. No supports his cause and yet he still keeps going in the wrong direction. We’ve told him over and over again but he’ll never get it. I’d just leave it alone.
He’s shown us what he can do in the F-14 vs MiG-23 and that led to a lock. The more you tell him, the more non-sense will come out of it.
It’s real. It would have much cooler if the B-1 had made that pass at near Mach speed though. 😎
I’d pick the FB-23 or B-1R concept before the FB-22. They both would probably have more range and payload cpacity than the FB-22.
Bring_it_on
It laughable the way you pretend to give a cheap price to the F-22, the F-22 is for the Domestic market not for export so even if the unit price is USD$ 190 million you have to add up what was paid by the same taxpayer, yes the same tax payer has to pay USD $62 billions to built one hundred eighty F-22s, it is the same for the US tax payer does not matter if the US tax payer now pays USD $190 million dollars, the question is the whole program will cost USD $ 62 billion dollars and you are already saying the USAF will get 180 aircraft so the unit price is USD $ 390 million dollars
Because there is only one confirmed customer and that is the USAF and only one payer and that is the US tax payer
The fly away cost is significantly smaller than what your figures suggest. The taxpayers and government have already paid off the R&D. It’s over, done, no more. Now the true cost is the price of the airframes.
You can smell them too,right? :rolleyes:
Correct, are you jealous? 😀
Thanks for putting old news that has been dicussed over and over into this thread with no helpful information in it. It didn’t even pertain to the subject. :rolleyes:
I saw the F-22 today over Marietta. Let me tell you, that is one baaaad plane. It just looks effortless in the air. I really would not want to be up against one of those in air to air combat.
You can really see some of the stealth features at low altitude. 😎
Bring_it_on
The whole point i said is according to Chinese military statemenst they are developing technologies that will detect the F-22.
Of course modern aircraft have few chances against advanced missiles such as the Python V or Meteor, that is the whole point of stealth, if the F-22 remains undetected will rule, no other aircraft will beat it unless the Istrevitel I-21 is developed and then you will have stealth aircraft versus stealth aircraft.
However if the Russians and Chinese achieve advanced radars capable to detect the F-22 or develop IRST sytems that can detect the F-22 then all the superiority it has will disappear.
According to russian reports the F-117 was detected quit often by old radars, they consider the Stealth technology imposes too many compromises over agility.
Fighters in the class of the MiG-29OVT have been developed with agility as the main factor and with advanced missiles if the Russian and Chinese develop good anti-stealth technologies will be a similar situation like the MiG-17 and F-4E
Like I said before, how does China know that they can detect stealthy aircraft such as the F-22? I would not trust the Chinese military from just one report. What are they going to test their radars against?
I also doubt that the F-117 was detected regularly otherwise you would seen more shot down. They don’t fly particularly high or fast so they would be easy to shoot down if detected. Russians and Chinese are far behind the US in stealth technology and probably anti-stealth technology.
Yes, the MiG-29OVT is very agile but the F-22 will hold its own as it holds a much better thrust to weight ratio and will be able to turn the fight into the vertical plane.
ermmm, again the 22s thingy???
well, there are some missconceptions to say that everything in th 22 is stealth, the plane isnt that stealth
also the stealth tech is overrated, it dont have effect on search radars, but most figther radars works in X band , but there are otheres that works in other bands, so
im tired for that , ppl see the f22, and say, “the wing is designed to stealth”, “the canopy is for stealth”, “the nozzles are for stealth -yea sure-“, “the wheels are for stealth”, etc,etc
a stealth design is the 23 one, and still that wasnt practical
is the stealth fashion……
Huh? I don’t think I understood a thing in that rambling paragraph. At least MIG-23MLD makes his coherent.