dark light

JFrazier

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 269 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-22A Raptor's Impressive Kill Ratio #2575868
    JFrazier
    Participant

    The most F-22’s I think the USAF will get will be around 250-300 which is a good number for what they’re using it for.

    in reply to: F-22A Raptor's Impressive Kill Ratio #2576072
    JFrazier
    Participant

    But what is going to be the turn rate of an F-22 at Mach 1.7?
    Any modern missile has the capability of hitting and destroying the F-22, the problem any aircraft like the Su-30MKI, MiG-29OVT have is detect the F-22.

    The F-22 has hit and run tactics but if it pretends to fight a F-15I with Python V; a Su-30MKI or a MiG-29OVT with R-74 backward firing at eye ball range i do not think it will be overwhelmingly superior.
    In fact the MiG-29OVT is more agile than the F-22 having 3D thrust vectoring Nozzles while the F-22 only has 2D thrust vectoring nozzles.

    Tell me why the F-117 which is stealthier than the F-22 but can not carry AAMs?

    Actually, the F-22 has been rumored to be stealthier than the F-117 in terms of RCS. It only makes sense knowing that it’s technology is 20 years newer.

    Also, don’t worry about the turn rate of the F-22 at Mach 1.7. It will be better than the MiG-31 or any other fighter for that matter. Thrust vectoring helps a tremendous amount at high Mach speeds.

    in reply to: F-22A Raptor's Impressive Kill Ratio #2576114
    JFrazier
    Participant

    Let`s start by AAMs, a Missile can hold 41Gs or 50Gs at high speed any F-22 pilot won`t hold more than 9Gs so at high speeds the Missile has the advantage

    Detectability is a reality for a stealth aircraft, they can be detected, nevertheless they use careful mission planing trying to avoid their enemy`s radars and stay out of the range where they can be detect with reliability.

    Any aircraft emits IR or has RCS that are measured upon the range they can be detected.

    The Russians claimed the Serbs had some degree of detection capability of US F-117s they shot down one F-117 and dameged at least three.

    The chinese claim they are developing technologies capable of detecting the F-22.

    The MiG-31, Eurofighters and other aircraft have IRST systems, it does mean the IR signature even small as it is in the F-22 can be detected.

    IRSTs are very susceptible to weather conditions. You won’t be able to rely on them like you would a radar. The F-22 will be difficult but not impossible to detect. Odds are that the F-22 pilots already know what airplane is in the area trying to detect them.

    I doubt that the Serbs could detect the F-117 repeatedly otherwise they would shot down many more that probably flew in the area before.

    Also, the F-22 is scheduled to get an IRST system but who knows when it will be implemented.

    in reply to: F-22A Raptor's Impressive Kill Ratio #2576128
    JFrazier
    Participant

    The F-22 can be challenge by the Eurofighter in supercuise terms and the MiG-31 is not far behind.

    Now what really makes the F-22 great is Stealth, nevertheless the Chinese claimed the F-22 is detectable, an F-117 was shot down and detected by 1960s technology, now consider that Russians, Europeans and Chinese are developing such systems for detectting faceted fighters with low IR signature.
    nese and Russians will have better radars that will be able to detect F-22s.

    But if the Russians and Chinese get reliable technology to detect F-22s well believe me the best AAM will be the diciding factor and stealth as we know it will become obsolete.

    Again, the Eurofighter does not supercruise as fast as the F-22 or with the range of the F-22. The Raptor is also manuverable at these speeds which cannot be said about the MiG-31.

    How does China know that they can detect the Raptor? They can barely design a stealth plane by themselves and please don’t bring up that downed F-117. Think of how many missions the F-117 probably flew over that radar before being shot down. One kill out of many thousand sorties does not mean all stealth airplanes are out in the open and detectable now.

    Stealth keeps evolving. There will always be ways to counteract detection and I am pretty sure the US military is prepared for when that time comes. There is a reason that other countries are going to this technology and I know they know more than you.

    in reply to: F-22A Raptor's Impressive Kill Ratio #2576165
    JFrazier
    Participant

    Now lets go to the most important part, many nations are working in anti-stealth technology, in fact the Russians claim that their fifth generation fighter will be first of all an aircraft that even if detected will be a very capable aircraft because as in the F-117 case, the American stealth technology is detectable so a fighter needs to be able to defend it self even if detected.

    However there are 3 technologies that are the most important in modwern aerial combat and these are: anti-stealth technologies, technologies to defeat advanced missiles such as the AMRAAM, Python V and Meteor and supercruise.

    Why would the Russians be going to low-RCS designs if anti-stealth technology is already out there?

    Anti-stealth development has been going on for a long time and I think the US military branches know that.

    in reply to: F-22A Raptor's Impressive Kill Ratio #2576169
    JFrazier
    Participant

    The F-22 has some competitors in some aspects, in agility perhaps the Su-30MKI, MiG-29OVT and Su-37 are more advanced, in Supercruise well the MiG-31 and Eurofighter are very close to the F-22 but in stealth no other aircraft is as advanced except th F-117 and B-2 and both are american

    The Eurofighter isn’t very close to the F-22 in supercruise and I doubt that it would be able to hold those speeds for as long as the F-22. In terms of manuverability, I am impressed more by the MiG-29OVT than the Su-30MKI. I think F-22 could hang with the MKI but the OVT would be a challenge. It would most likely be toast from a BVR shot however. The F-22 is two generations ahead of the F-117 in terms of stealth technology and its RCS is probably equal to or smaller than that plane’s.

    Fighters like the J-10, MiG-31, Su-35BM or MiG-29OVT can be as lethal as the F-22 if you upgrade them at the Eurofighter level in terms of weaponry and supercruise, if an F-22 is detected on the regular basis then these aircraft and technologies will defeat the whole F-22 concept.
    .

    I don’t see how they can be at the F-22’s level. Their airframe designs are a generation behind, as are the electronic and avionics packages. The F-22 will not be detected on a normal basis. That’s the point of the F-22. I would think that US engineers and test teams have put the F-22 against the most powerful radars in our arsenal. You can’t just say that stealth is obsolete just because one plane was downed.

    Those planes pose no threat to the F-22 in the BVR arena and the OVT and BM are the only ones to get close in the WVR area. However, the F-22 will see them far before they detect it.

    MiG-31 :rolleyes:

    in reply to: F-22A Raptor's Impressive Kill Ratio #2576430
    JFrazier
    Participant

    I think it is premature to make such comparisons and judgements, as not much is known about the Russian aircraft in development and neither about the specifics of the F-22s performance.

    I agree.

    in reply to: F-22A Raptor's Impressive Kill Ratio #2577009
    JFrazier
    Participant

    I can see why officials want to export the F-22 to other countries. They are trying to keep the assembly line open just in case they can eke out more orders at a later date.

    in reply to: Typhoon vs. JSF in BVR #2580087
    JFrazier
    Participant

    Airsoft? What is that, paintball? I’ve played that three or four times. Pretty fun. Defintely makes you respect the guys who do it with real bullets.

    Kind of like paintball except it;s not as messy and doesn’t hurt as much. I got hit two times and I was done with paintball. 😀

    in reply to: Valiant sheild 2006 #2580314
    JFrazier
    Participant

    Pure power. Who’s gonna mess with that? 😎

    in reply to: F-22A Raptor's Impressive Kill Ratio #2580329
    JFrazier
    Participant

    Some F-15C, F-16 Block 60s, and Soon the Super Hornet all have AESAs.

    Correct and I would guess that the F-15C’s in this exercise had them as they are stationed at the base this effort occured.

    in reply to: US and Iraqi Mirage F-1 #2580924
    JFrazier
    Participant

    Cannon fodder for A-10’S at Nellis’s range! :dev2:

    I agree. Same with that MiG-25. Big target for big bullets. 😀

    in reply to: How NOT to land a B-1B #2580944
    JFrazier
    Participant

    Please forgive me but. . . 😮

    http://www.strategypage.com/gallery/articles/military_photos_2006620201331.asp

    That was pretty cool. The nose made a good imprint on the runway. Sad that plane make a landing like that. I think the B-1 is pretty much my favorite bomber of all time.

    in reply to: Carrier drag race. #2050640
    JFrazier
    Participant

    Goddamn. . .you don’t suppose they’re trying to send anybody a message do you? :confused:

    Maybe just a little message saying “There’s more where that came from”. :dev2:

    The SHs look pretty good. They’re no Tomcats in the looks department but I like them anyway.

    JFrazier
    Participant

    I believe Keldysh has had a plasma stealth system on the export market for a while now, although I’m not sure if this is the “full-up” system.

    They obviously have no concept of the doppler effect and doppler notch then…

    Hmm…I didn’t know about the plasma stealth. The Cobra on the other hand, I still don’t believe that something going that slow would fool a modern radar. I get the principles behind it and how it might theoretically work but I just don’t see it happening in ACM or wartime.

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 269 total)