dark light

phrozenflame

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 988 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Guess who wants the Gripen now? #2671213
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Would The Swede Gov approve the sale?

    in reply to: Was Fc-1 involved in incident? #2672366
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    I’ve seen this atleast twice here also, but not with details, there was indeed a leakage and los of feul and shut down of engines, I dont know more than that, but wow the pilot made it at that speed and angle.

    in reply to: Fc-1 has US technology – a claim #2672703
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    I thought that the FC-1 was Chinese tech? 🙂

    We recently heard news reports talking about a Chinese radar being fitted to the fc-1, a smaller version of the j-10 radar has been mentioned. One wonders why an aircraft that a few months ago, was taunted as having such a big nose, would not get the same j-10 sized radar? Am I the only one who finds this confusing, why would u want to get a less capable radar if you can fit the original and more capable radar in the nose?

    China is wayy off the plasma stealth field.

    There are many things on J-10 radar which might be of no use for Fc-1 for e.g. sim. engagements etc etc.

    As for Pasma stealth, ignore Aseem 😉

    in reply to: Fc-1 has US technology – a claim #2672872
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    The JF-17 will surely be a good aircraft imagine what good aircraft it would be with
    BVR SD-10
    Stealth
    Quadriplex FBW
    I think if it developed at this rate Pakistan wont need any US F-16’s in near future.
    The rate at which Chinais developing technology in 2 yrs time Pak will have JF-17 equivalent to F-16I if not better.

    Remove Stealth, they’ll work to reduce RCS, not to make it *stealth* as in context of Raptor.

    in reply to: IAF news and pics Thread : Oct 2004 + #2673375
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Earth to saturn. India is implementing a mix of indigenous and imported prodNow *what* did Pakistan design and develop in the *original* Al Khalid?

    Armor? Nope its Chinese!
    Gun- ditto!
    Engine + Transmission- Ukrainian…
    Optics- French..

    What seminal contribution did Pakistan make to the Khalid? Merely asking Norinco to make something for you, repainting it green does not make it Pakistani! Were it that things were so simple. :rolleyes:
    You would be better served in looking up the mods made to lic produced American M113’s to enable them to fire Chinese Red Arrow HJ8’s..at least those had some design contribution from Pakistans’s side!

    heh you forgot to add the BMS..y?? koz its was *slap on the face* of those who questioned Pakdef credibility, I understand you were one of them.

    in reply to: IAF news and pics Thread : Oct 2004 + #2673382
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    *cough* BSer*cough*

    *cough* look whose talking *cough*

    Nice thing ppl arent digging up your posts *cough*

    Nice to see some Indians referring to ACIG…heh..one uses it as a credible source to claim BRAHMOS stuff..while the other brushes it aside due to the KILLS table we have of IAF and PAF 😀

    in reply to: IAF news and pics Thread : Oct 2004 + #2673596
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    I have been perplexed by a lot of Indian purchases, and for the life of me I can’t believe they are buying things from outside first, and then if nothing is available they look inwards?

    I can’t imagine (let’s say US) finds out that the JSF is not likely to be on schedule and then as a “stop-gap” measure decides to go and buy Eurofighter or Rafale instead?

    Why does India send so much money outside when they could wait it out for local equipment to come good? Don’t they understand the simple logic that national defense doesn’t mean just fighting battles with good equipment only, but has a lot to do with national capabilities, infrastructure and R&D and of course, the economy?

    Also why does India buy so much of it’s big ticket items from the UN security council veto holders (except for China)?

    Few years ago their now president proudly claimed that most of the stuff in armed forces would be indigenouzed…look now..opposite is happening…LCA was suposed to replace the migs..something else is doing that..Arjun was supposed to be MBT for IA…but they’re buying 1000 T-90s…..etc etc.

    I still beleive they shouyld replace atm the migs with migs and than with LCA.

    You’re talking about 7 billion dollars. Its big even for India.

    As for UNSC…I think it was their best friend U.S. which didnt let India in…

    and its funny India makes noise about American stuff which goes to PAF…you know over here they claim they can wash out all of our forces in 2-3 days..but their experienced political leaders start jumping even if USA thinks about giving something to Pak. Look at the difference.

    in reply to: IAF news and pics Thread : Oct 2004 + #2673925
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Gripens, F-16s and other options are simply to put pressure on the other potential suppliers. The only real candidates are MiG-29Ms and Mirage-2000-5 Mk.2s.

    Dont you know the suppliers would know that…especially the Dassualt and Mig-29 makers.

    They both probably know its between them..everything else is a noisemaker.

    in reply to: Target Iran: scenarios, policies and speculation playground. #2674636
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Arent alot of US navy in the Gulf Sea under the range of Iran’s Cruise Missiles….a concentrated attack could hurt the navy.

    and who knows…they might march the armies to Iraq to “Liberate” it…It’ll be probably welcomed in southern Iraq to say the least. They are not strong conventially against America. But America’s whole plan in Iraq would screw up full time..and that means spending tens of more billion dollars. This can be a good stretagic move by Iran. Everything in Iraq would be screwed up for Americans. Iran’s move in Iraq fails or not..but American for time being would fail. If they plan such thing…it needs to be something like blitzkrieg.

    I dont know about Arab governments, but Arabs dont really hate Iran/Persians, even if they do, They hate America and Israel much more. Many Arabs infact are orignally from Iran too. Iran might only attack Arab countries if its being used directly for staging attacks against Iran, and thats FAIR ethically.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part 3 #2674647
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Conformal Feul Tanks would be nice only if RD-93 was more powerfull.

    in reply to: IAF news and pics Thread : Oct 2004 + #2674656
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    India sets out fighter jet plans

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4020275.stm

    Russia’s MiG-29 could be one of the targeted fighters
    India has begun the process of buying 125 new fighter aircraft, a senior air force official has said.
    Vice Chief of Air Staff SK Malik said in the southern Indian city of Bangalore on Wednesday that all options were open.

    “We will go global. Perhaps F-16s will be there. Swedish Grippen, Mirage 2000 and MiG-29 will be there,” he said.

    The air force modernisation plan will replace its fleet of ageing and often unreliable Russian MiG-21s.

    Two-year schedule

    Air Marshal Malik was speaking at the annual conference of the Indian Society of Aerospace Medicine.

    “We have not short-listed any aircraft nor discounted any,” he said.

    Air Marshal Malik said the initial process of identifying the required aircraft would take about two years.

    Why is Gripen there when LCA was supposed to be superior or equal to it?

    in reply to: Status LCA #2675240
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    A question..when the LSPs arrive in 2007-8..are they going to be further evaluated before a big order is placed and things start moving on??

    in reply to: 8 P-3C for $970M? #2676121
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    This is the good news year for Pak Armed Forces 😀

    Nothing for PAF still, they’re still not sending any help to the ost crucial oraganization.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2677404
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Before I forget, the Swedish Eriye system is similar. I will not be surprised, if that infos will not be shared with China by Pakistan?! 😉

    Pak may not even take Erieye if Chinese AWACS become available and are close in capabilities..in AFM interview the head said Chinese or Swedish AWACS.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2678038
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Hiye..anyone got the details for FC-1 / JF-17 radar??

    Also if China decides to get FC-1, will they use the same local radar as that on initial batch meant for PAF?

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 988 total)